Apologies—my previous post invoking the Nuremberg trials caused some understandable consternation. My bad! The Nuremberg trials represent MILITARY LAW, and should not be construed as a call for violence or death against someone (many received prison sentences or had sentences commuted). 🇺🇸
(en.m.wikipedia.org)
🤡 Clown World 🌎
Why is this stickied? Because sometimes I get things wrong. I understand the Nuremberg stuff, but then did exactly what my title says I'm not supposed to do! UGH. Thanks for understanding.
MILITARY. It's the only way.
Don't apologize, these people deserve everything coming to them. Military punishments are the easy way out.
Thanks. I won't apologize to those sentenced, but I owe you guys a nod when I make the wrong call, as I did, here. 👍
Cool. I feel better now, FWIW. 👍 This site has been really strong lately, and you deserve a LOT of credit. So that spicy hot take that I obviously disagreed with gave me pause.
We all have bad takes, poorly worded episodes - your role here just makes yours a bit more high profile, and thus having to say "Let's redo this" a little tougher, so when you do, big credit to you.
One tangential point I'll add: Calls for violence and death aren't inherently bad... I just didn't think it was deserved for THAT guy. What he admitted could not have been easy.
Cheers, cats!
Absolutely. I think of myself as one of you, but with extra duties (banning shills and keeping things civil is a "job" for sure). When I get it wrong, I appreciate getting called out. And if I stickied my hot-headed take, then I have to sticky this one, too. Rats, sigh.
My post might have avoided all this had I said, "I don't forgive you, I want you tried under military law." So, definitely, your point was valid. But, OK, since we buried that hatchet, ON to the next one! So let me ask: do you think he can be forgiven, given his position?
Before I retired, I worked in journalism for 25 years, 15 of it at some of the biggest Midwest newspapers. The idea that they didn't KNOW is just ludicrous to me. At the newspaper (at least back then) the editors were untouchable. We answered to the readers alone. The executives only ran the paper, and would even ignore us and avoid being seen talking to us in any informal way due to optics. Now?
To me, this guy was complicit for 18 months. He dumped his reader's best interests—in my mind, a fiduciary duty—and let the narrative be dictated to him. That... Well, from my perspective, that literally BOGGLES my mind. I've seen editors (none I knew personally, mind you) walk for MUCH less. That's why I'm all over the "knowingly" part.
No worries and no forgiveness needed from me u/catsfive! I understood and THANK you for your service as a Patriot. Get some rest fren!
I don't doubt that/disagree with that for a second. (You carried the "knowingly" over to our crypto debate, which confused me there for a bit. 😀)
Yes, he know. They knew. That knew that they we're lying, and they knew that that was wrong.
But they sunk into lies gradually, which is how it happens. Likely he dug that hole over a lifetime. And to now shake them off, in this still-totalitarian-statist environment, publicly, is not. easy. at. all. "Stunning and brave", I might have been tempted to call it, if that phrase weren't so woke-broken.
That's not to say there weren't real, terrible results from those lies. That's not to say there shouldn't be consequences for what he has done. But, at the same time, practically and humanely, we want to make clear there are going to be rewards, there will be grace for those who can turn away from lies at the very time when doing so will be the most difficult.
Respectfully, however, I don't for one second call reversing their stance Brave or courageous when clearly, they are only doing it because the protesters are in the streets literally outside their headquarters. Six months ago? Maybe that would have been brave. But no, absolutely, not now.
Haven't seen anyone calling for vigilante killings. We all want JUSTICE. Proper justice through the systems we have in place, and the appropriate punishment many of these globohomo traitors have earned is death.
I'm not sure what he said that you disagreed with in that other post, since I am at the point where I agree wholeheartedly.
Try reading what I wrote.
I was very clear.
Everyone else understood.
It's not that difficult.
You can manage.
It's exhausting sometimes hearing people on this site calling for the death of these useful idiots for "committing treason" when there are also obviously sooooo many bigger fish to fry. Who knows, maybe this guy is worse than he seems. Like you say, there need to be lawful trials. Your post was far less insulting than a lot of the stuff I've seen on here.
It did come off pretty histrionic, didn't it? Sorry for any confusion. I ask a question here, and would love your thoughts on it.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12jd4osgUK/x/c/4JBxP03Ereq
Part of what is wrong with our society, having to be PC and proper on everything. I do not think all doctors, nurses, media, and famous people are guilty to the point of a death penalty, but I do think they are guilty and there better be some recourse. Seriously we are talking about millions of people at this point. Seems like once sentences start rolling out we could get a lot of good things done around our communities. Make them pay, but don't ruin their lives anymore than they will be. There quite possibly could be some serious deaths coming with the jab and enough turmoil. We went through this 70 years ago.....
Fauci, he'll get the gallows. But, how complicit is the doctor on Skype on my local news? I guess that's what I'm trying to wrap my head around.
How guilty is the “news” that aired it?
You and me both.
Is the local news guy a paid talking head? Or just some local dr whos been indoctrinated into believing everything the medical community says is fact, then goes on tv thinking they are "helping make the world a safer place?"
Im sure a lot of these dr hold ama n all that other crap to a high standard.
Eitherway, this should be a top down tricking effect, kinda like what green span did with the economy
Fair enough!
Archive link for your convenience
The best part of the original Nuremberg trials is how many were to-be sentenced to death, but then 'They' were like, "You know what? Never mind all that- why don't you start NASA (ect.) with us instead!"
On Nazi Wernher Von Braun's (Friend to Walt Disney) headstone is a lone "Psalm 19:1" - The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork.
The animated Disney Castle logo shows this.
Disney is Big Evil.
Will this come out in the new trials?
Everything resurfaces for a reason.
Read you loud and clear
There is no need for any calls to violence. The MIL will deal with that front of this war.
I will say that, for the sake of my soul, it is a good thing i am not one to decide the punishment for such evils as we have seen, and that the MIL will be making those calls. I would be too... creative.
The cabal may fear the storm, but in the end, they should be grateful we do not get to decide their fate.