1
NewAccount1 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am not seeing this anywhere in the "new" section? Why is that

4
NewAccount1 4 points ago +4 / -0

Normies will say he is saying that there is a thing called climate crisis but a lot of people don't believe it and need to be convinced. Inconclusive.

7
NewAccount1 7 points ago +8 / -1

I was half expecting a nothing burger but this was anything but. Excellent video presentation. Showed it to a few people who usually laugh and dismiss everything and while they weren't sold completely there was significantly less laughing and they were generally less dismissive than normal.

5
NewAccount1 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hmm... I think we are way past needing anything more to know that they cheated?

8
NewAccount1 8 points ago +8 / -0

The board is under constant attacks from sock puppets and bots who aim to to disrupt, divide and demoralize us. They also want to make us look bad by posting idiotic, racist or violent things and then upvoting others like them doing the same.

After a while you learn to just read around it. Report those who are.doing it if you want. It helps the mods a little but this can never be eradicated fully until the cabal is eradicated fully.

10
NewAccount1 10 points ago +12 / -2

Go throught this posters history. Nothing but concern trolling, pessimism and deflection. Reportm downvote and move on.

7
NewAccount1 7 points ago +10 / -3

Take this shill post out. This is a subtle.strategy they use to make it seem we are vindictively obsessed with "hanging the traitors". Yes we want justice and that may well in some cases include death penalties, but most of us are not looking for some guillotine french revolution madness and this rhetoric is seriously off putting to newbies and normies.

1
NewAccount1 1 point ago +1 / -0

The mods seriously need to step up and do something about these entries. It comes up again and again and it is feeding this virgins ego. He is TROLLING us with this name! He is NOT a Rothschild!

3
NewAccount1 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Have fun! This is an amazing thing your doing! Regardless of how people respond, have confidence that you are making a difference and helping to save lives."

Didn't know I could cringe this hard.

1
NewAccount1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Piers is a bit of an enigma. On the one hand he is a total gun control lunatic and climate alarmist and sensationalist. On other topics he can be quite based. The left hates him as much as the conservatjves do and he seems to always keep a job because he is good for ratings.

As a sidenote he participated in Celebrity Apprentice with Trump where he won convincingly, crushing the snake Omarosa into pulp in a memorable matchup. He is generally much less critical of Trump than most of the mainstream.

The problem with liking him partially is that he often then turns around and says something completely brainwashed and outrageusm.

EDIT grammar haha, lots of punctuation errors

1
NewAccount1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Their whole basis and justification of the censorship happening is that it is clear that the public is too dumb to figure out what is happening by getting both sides of the argument and must be restricted to the watered down and oversimplified explanations of the so called "experts". When I grew up noone would have carried such an authoritarian notion in their head but here we are. That's how successful they have been at this braimwashing. Thankfully, I believe not succesful enoughm

0
NewAccount1 0 points ago +1 / -1

Mods, can you please correct people when they refer to this guy as a Rothschild. He literally writes on his site that he is site that he uses that name to troll us! Don't let this pathetic basement virgin succeed in making us look stupid.

6
NewAccount1 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's not Sicilian defence, that comes after e4-c5 whereas this is something like d4-d5 followed by b3 which is not a very common opening sequence and is refeered to as queens pawn opening.

https://www.365chess.com/opening.php?m=4&n=406&ms=d4.d5.b3

I also don't remember Q ever posting this position, in what drop was that?

by BQnita
0
NewAccount1 0 points ago +1 / -1

So now Kobe Bryant was innocent as well? Did you read his testimony the night after?

His story was full of inconsistencies, she went straight to the police and had bruises on her neck...

I refuse to believe that MJ was too stupid to realize how bad it looked that he was having these sleepovers. What can not be refuted is how many young boys he would become besties with before shunning them completely. This is the behaviour of a psychopath and for me is the "smoking gun".

To simply say "everyone" of his accusers was just looking for a payday is just conjecture that fits in with what you want to believe. Watch Leaving Neverland, the testimony presented is highly believable and the would have to be professionally trained liars to fabricate such a story while showing none of the indications of lying. They didn't dramatize the story or tell it with enthusiasm. They seemed genuinely traumatized and both still had deep feelinga for him. Staff at leaving neverland has come forward with stories. There was a lot of evidence and the fact that he escaped justice was because he had access to an army of well paid lawyers who were able to orchestrate his defence and because the two boys in the film covered for him in the trial.

I used to thimk he was innocent too. I bought the whole "kindred spirit" narrative. I don't anymore.

As far as his friendship with DJT goes who knows. Maybe he believed it as well. And perhaps he liked the publicity aspect of it. I can only speculate. So can you.

If it turns out I am wrong that sucks. I can still only go by what evidence is in front of me. This behavior was not normal. I don't buy that he was such a massive threat to the deep state while simultaneously generating so much cash for them. If he had information that could could expose the global elite pedophile rings why not release it? Why not say "they are the real pedophiles"?

As a fan of his music I would love to believe he was innocent. I just try to use logic, not emotions and what I want to be true to reach conclusions.

by BQnita
-2
NewAccount1 -2 points ago +4 / -6

I am so tired of this bullshit! MJ was just trying to "save the children from the cabal"... Really? By having them sleep in his bed? By looking at porn with them?

He literally flew around with these young "boy toys" on tour staying in his hotel room and then he dumped them for new ones when he got tired of them! There are multiple, credible, detailed testimonies from his victims!

His "wacko Jacko" image was carefully crafted to explain his behaviour and the "he was just a kid at heart" excuse is the most overused rationale of pedophiles everywhere!

He was protected by the establishment and his few "conspiratorially woke" quotes floating around only prove that he was smart enough to make the narrative of him being the victim more credible.

Seriously, he is on a level with Epstein and Savile as the worst offenders in history! He literally built his own amusement park and used to lure unsuspecting kids that he then molested!

And yet so many refuse to believe it just because he occasionally sang about "love" and "peace" and "unity" and some more emotionally charged buzzwords. He also sang about being "Bad" and "Dangerous" which was a bit more truthful.

His talent was undeniable but as we know that is no proof of innocense.

... and screw Bill Maher as well.

1
NewAccount1 1 point ago +1 / -0

I doubt it. It sounds like you are just feeding a shill narrative.

1
NewAccount1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks for this. Let's not forget how many of the people promoting the use of the word are just shills hoping to turn people away. Ive yet to meet a racist Q follower.

1
NewAccount1 1 point ago +1 / -0

I find this suspect. R/conspiracy has been completely compromised for ca. 9 years. Was most blatantly obvious when there was a massive shill campaign to "ban the memes!" when they were becoming too effective and the mods were completely complicit in making that a reality. Man I was pissed.