Ex parte Milligan (1866) concerned the rights of an Indiana man accused of conspiring against the Union during the Civil War. The Supreme Court ruled that it is unconstitutional for civilians to be tried by military tribunals when civil courts are available.
Ex parte Milligan seems to relate to the Great Awakening in regards to the circumstances required for military tribunals, but the text presented in this post is not in the text of that case.
or attempts to enforce such suspension within 50 independent, sovereign, continental United States of America
Objection. How is the above citation even historically possible?
It would have been oddly prescient of them to know we'd eventually ever have 50 states. The Civil War ended in 1865. As of 1870 the following states hadn't entered the union yet: North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Washington, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Arizona, Alaska and Hawaii. If it was contemporaneous it would say 38 or so.
Fake content like this only serves to make us look bad because people will spread it around social media and then it will discredit them.
In fact, I do not think it to be an exaggeration to say that people that post fake stuff like this are potentially here to cause harm. At the very least, it would be tough to decide if they are causing harm or just idiots.
Posts like this need to be banned, and if someone posts 3 things that are fake, they need to be banned because they are a threat.
People - stop taking stuff you find on Instagram etc and spreading it without a fuck all clue if it’s real or not.
California, NY, MI and more - they all locked down and restricted travel and the right to freely assemble. We let them the first time and we'll let them the next time.
We will only start to fight back when we can no longer eat, and maybe not even then.
Then what are we waiting for? It seems that this alone should get them ousted from office and we should have enough election fraud to prove Trump won. The rest of the states can go on with their audits while President Trump puts our country back together. And all the bad people could be rounded up and sent to Gitmo. Seems like we should already have all that we need. Any thoughts???
What are we waiting for? We are waiting for America to come together in a system designed to keep you divided. We are waiting for some accountability in a system that protects the very ones who should be held accountable. We are waiting for our politicians to save our country while they accept money from the same people who want to destroy it. We are waiting for the news to tell us everything is going to be ok in a system that runs off of fear.
Until WE stop waiting around, nothing will get done. President Trump lit a fire under our ass and woke a lot of people up, but he is not our savior, WE are.
It's time for the men in this country to start acting like men. It's time we stop blindly obeying the elites who have been spoon fed their entire lives.
Exactly the way I feel; but I keep hearing that the plan is working. It would be nice if we got some HARD EVIDENCE like DURHAM to come out and end this entire charade. There are a lot of us whose patience is growing thin and trying our best not to lose faith in the plan. But when you see the Constitution written out in plain view of WHAT We the People are entitled to do to rid our country of these evil tyrants; it makes you wonder what we are waiting for.
Um ... so the second circled red section is someone's comment regarding the SC's ruling. Because there sure as shootin' wasn't 50 states then. But yeah, it doesn't even take a ruling from the SC to know that. It's good to have, nevertheless.
This case is 1 year after the Civil War, so I wonder if it was meant to address Pres. Lincoln's suspension of habeas corpus and other Constitutional rights during the Civil War? At the time of this ruling, Lincoln had been dead for a bit and the Civil War was over.... so does this ruling ensure that no president, judicial officer, or bureaucrat can ever again defy the Constitution?
Fake content like this only serves to make us look bad because people will spread it around social media and then it will discredit them.
In fact, I do not think it to be an exaggeration to say that people that post fake stuff like this are potentially here to cause harm. At the very least, it would be tough to decide if they are causing harm or just idiots.
Posts like this need to be banned, and if someone posts 3 things that are fake, they need to be banned because they are a threat.
People - stop taking stuff you find on Instagram etc and spreading it without a fuck all clue if it’s real or not.
There are 2 different comments here in this photo.....
The first one is a statement and the second a response or conclusion!
It’s just an opinion..... but whose is it?
We need context mate..... you have chopped too much off your image....like what the arrows to each comment say..... is this from another guys work mate... it’s no problem but just reference him/her....
Is this BS? I was born when there were only 48 states. I may be as old as dirt but I certainly wasn't born shortly after the civil war. That would be my grandparents
LOL the Supreme Court can be wrong, and frequently is.
They can write whatever they want, but the Constitution can never be legitimately construed, by them or by anyone else, to be a recipe for its own destruction.
If the Republic itself is in imminent danger of being obliterated, say, by communism, unless the president takes action; then he has to do whatever he sees fit to eradicate the enemy and preserve the Republic to which the Constitution pertains. At the moment of the Republic's dissolution, the document ceases to have any meaning or importance.
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-fact-check-ex-parte-milligan-idUSKBN22Q2M6
Ex parte Milligan seems to relate to the Great Awakening in regards to the circumstances required for military tribunals, but the text presented in this post is not in the text of that case.
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/71/2/
Once i realized that i deleted the post.
Should have checked it first.
Objection. How is the above citation even historically possible?
It would have been oddly prescient of them to know we'd eventually ever have 50 states. The Civil War ended in 1865. As of 1870 the following states hadn't entered the union yet: North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Washington, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Arizona, Alaska and Hawaii. If it was contemporaneous it would say 38 or so.
The ruling ex Parte Milligan says nothing in the graphic given above: https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/71/2.html
Please do some basic first grade footwork without resorting to conjured Deludinum.
Feels like this line was written by Dwight Schrute.
Fake content like this only serves to make us look bad because people will spread it around social media and then it will discredit them.
In fact, I do not think it to be an exaggeration to say that people that post fake stuff like this are potentially here to cause harm. At the very least, it would be tough to decide if they are causing harm or just idiots.
Posts like this need to be banned, and if someone posts 3 things that are fake, they need to be banned because they are a threat.
People - stop taking stuff you find on Instagram etc and spreading it without a fuck all clue if it’s real or not.
For that reason I am deporting the post
Thank you!
Upvoted for this gem
Adding it to the "Wish I'd Thought of That" list
"I find your musings shallow and pedantic"- Peter Griffin
This (also wasn't this the central reason for the Civil War?)
Are the two red circled sections from different rulings at different times? I ask because there were not fifty (50) states in 1866. Thanks.
I think this comes from this blog:
https://sbynews.blogspot.com/2020/05/ex-parte-milligan-71-us-2-1866.html?m=1
And the lower red circle is the opinion of the Blog writer not the SCOTUS.
As well that case was mostly about military tribunals used for citizens when lawful normal courts are still open.
Print that up and wipe your ass with it.
California, NY, MI and more - they all locked down and restricted travel and the right to freely assemble. We let them the first time and we'll let them the next time.
We will only start to fight back when we can no longer eat, and maybe not even then.
You identified the problem. "You let them.
Now to fix it. Tell them to go fuck themselves.
I didn't lock down. I went about my business.
I never put a mask 9n my face. I went to businesses that recognized my rights.
My city had a 9pm curfew. I WAS OUT BURNIN TIRES OFF MY CAR AT MIDNIGHT!
TELL THEM TO GO FUCK THEMSELVES!!
You may inconvenience yourself a bit. But what is your freedom and life worth to you?
You only speak for yourself, about yourself. Change yourself. Others will make their own decisions based on their own knowledge and time tables.
Then what are we waiting for? It seems that this alone should get them ousted from office and we should have enough election fraud to prove Trump won. The rest of the states can go on with their audits while President Trump puts our country back together. And all the bad people could be rounded up and sent to Gitmo. Seems like we should already have all that we need. Any thoughts???
What are we waiting for? We are waiting for America to come together in a system designed to keep you divided. We are waiting for some accountability in a system that protects the very ones who should be held accountable. We are waiting for our politicians to save our country while they accept money from the same people who want to destroy it. We are waiting for the news to tell us everything is going to be ok in a system that runs off of fear.
Until WE stop waiting around, nothing will get done. President Trump lit a fire under our ass and woke a lot of people up, but he is not our savior, WE are.
It's time for the men in this country to start acting like men. It's time we stop blindly obeying the elites who have been spoon fed their entire lives.
Exactly the way I feel; but I keep hearing that the plan is working. It would be nice if we got some HARD EVIDENCE like DURHAM to come out and end this entire charade. There are a lot of us whose patience is growing thin and trying our best not to lose faith in the plan. But when you see the Constitution written out in plain view of WHAT We the People are entitled to do to rid our country of these evil tyrants; it makes you wonder what we are waiting for.
Um ... so the second circled red section is someone's comment regarding the SC's ruling. Because there sure as shootin' wasn't 50 states then. But yeah, it doesn't even take a ruling from the SC to know that. It's good to have, nevertheless.
This case is 1 year after the Civil War, so I wonder if it was meant to address Pres. Lincoln's suspension of habeas corpus and other Constitutional rights during the Civil War? At the time of this ruling, Lincoln had been dead for a bit and the Civil War was over.... so does this ruling ensure that no president, judicial officer, or bureaucrat can ever again defy the Constitution?
Fake content like this only serves to make us look bad because people will spread it around social media and then it will discredit them.
In fact, I do not think it to be an exaggeration to say that people that post fake stuff like this are potentially here to cause harm. At the very least, it would be tough to decide if they are causing harm or just idiots.
Posts like this need to be banned, and if someone posts 3 things that are fake, they need to be banned because they are a threat.
People - stop taking stuff you find on Instagram etc and spreading it without a fuck all clue if it’s real or not.
Its been deleted.
Those cites are not from that case
ex parte Milligan, 71 US 2 - Supreme Court 1866
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9985485675344493119&q=milligan+71+us2+1866&hl=en&as_sdt=6,44
Nice. So, Sniffie Joe, declare a nationwide lockdown, please. Do it now.
lockdown = lockup
Left wingers...they do like their word twisting
There are 2 different comments here in this photo.....
The first one is a statement and the second a response or conclusion!
It’s just an opinion..... but whose is it?
We need context mate..... you have chopped too much off your image....like what the arrows to each comment say..... is this from another guys work mate... it’s no problem but just reference him/her....
WWG1WGA
Is this BS? I was born when there were only 48 states. I may be as old as dirt but I certainly wasn't born shortly after the civil war. That would be my grandparents
Probably is bs. I deleted it
Nice!! I need to start passing this out!
Don't it fake. I didnt vet it...
Why? To show your don't know history?
How many states were there at that time?
LOL the Supreme Court can be wrong, and frequently is.
They can write whatever they want, but the Constitution can never be legitimately construed, by them or by anyone else, to be a recipe for its own destruction.
If the Republic itself is in imminent danger of being obliterated, say, by communism, unless the president takes action; then he has to do whatever he sees fit to eradicate the enemy and preserve the Republic to which the Constitution pertains. At the moment of the Republic's dissolution, the document ceases to have any meaning or importance.
This is bbbbbbbulshit right here. Pedes, read the comments before upvoting. Some frens finding loopholes on this argument like swiss cheese.
None of this matters unless people start taking action.