Many of our old documents like the constitution and others are slowly changing form not by amendments but by the faggots at Webster’s dictionary and the paychopathic fucking kikes at the ADL
They wish to confuse the original meanings with their twisted modern day retardation in order to remove our rights while our future generations are unable to recognize it
I attended classes after retiring from the military and got into more than one argument with my younger classmates about the meaning of a particular word.
They were supposed to be debates, but my obsession with the correct meaning of a particular word put me at a serious disadvantage which is exactly why they do that sh*t.
It's their way of not letting us play in their reindeer games!
What word?
Democracy was one.
Freedom of Speech while not a word was another argument.
Separation of Church & State was a third argument.
It was rather apparent that civics education has seen a significant decline in high school from when I went.
Racisim is another one.
Interesting! What were their arguments?
That's literally the worst! It's like they want to have their cake and eat it, too! I could care less about debating such people.
You want to win an argument? Attack the fictitious language people use.
The most correct person wins.
Democracy and republic are often times interchanged as if both only mean they oppose a monarchy.
Ever heard a Democrat say we need to save the Republic?
Only when wanking over starwars.
"My allegiance is to the Republic! To democracy!"
Which is why I’m wondering what will be immediately be done to the education system and how quickly those changes will be enacted once all this shit is over.
The idea is that language changes over time. Simply try and read Washingtons farewell address of 1793. It's English alright, but with a vernacular that is unrelated to today.
Francis Bacon has been very influential in creating the English language, allegedly to make it better suited for poetry and to allow better communication between people. Neologisms all around. Especially, compounded words, and loan words from French ( which was the official court language)
If Geoffrey of Monmouth is to be believed, in Brittain a gobbledygook Greek was spoken, which given some words is not a totally made up idea. And of course, in terms of the language people spoke, There were brittons, Romans, Norse, Saxons, Angles, Frysians, Normans, Celts, and a host of local languages to loan words from.
The same process can be seen in Dutch. Afrikaans, is an offshoot. I can read it but eh ... it's different. And reading the original Act of Abjuration is hardly do-able. First there is the spelling: Today for house the Dutch use huis. In Plat, huus or hoes. In them days: huys.
German has the same evolution, not to mention the writing style. Goethe in original writing style is difficult.
Latin changed as well, over time, old latin vs Church latin. French also changed.
Today, there is street language. And then we have mass immigration changing the meaning of words of everyday items.
The effect on law interpretation follows these changes over time.
The biggest influence in law interpretation at this point is political correct language. Cultural marxism changes the meaning of words. A racist used to be what a proctologist is or an anesthesiologist, or psychologist is.
Today a racist is someone who is divisive and looking down on other races. And of course, in the US, that is systemic.
Those declining to take the vaxx labeled as vaxx hesitant. Really? It does change the meaning of hesitant, does it not, or convey the wrong image.
All this brings into view: how do you establish a fact, when you are using words? What are words? Sounds connected to each other. In writing it represents symbols. So what do words actually mean in terms of frequency and manifestation? What in that context is right and wrong?
Interest. What do you mean? Your sense of being fascinated or curious by a topic? Or do you mean the price of a debt?
Very good post in terms of the dynamics of language. However, words changing over time is one thing. Dictionaries arbitrarily altering the definitions of numerous words within a matter of weeks such that definitions now fit the PC and totally contrived woke ideologies is an entirely different situation.
Well the "opposite" is also true.
Think of a very tiny word: amen.
Most people will be content knowing that it is used in Hebrew and is meant to convey the idea of true. In Aramaic, what Jesus spoke, he said: Truly, Truly, I tell you, => amen, amen.
He actually used it in a judicial way, to underscore the truthfulness of his words. In contemporary vernacular we would administer an oath: Do you swear to tell the truth, nothing but the truth , so help you God.
But the use of the word amen is much older. An Egyptian connection. Some people immediately go into all kinds of rants on invocation of strange gods, but that is not what it is. Amen = truth. Absolute truth. Just as much as JHVH means I am, which when you think about it is everything there is to say. To be is all. That's it.
Whether one is Muslim, Christian, or Judaic, Buddhist or Hindhu, all five are convinced when asked, that God is THE ULTIMATE ABSOLUTE TRUTH. Amen, is that word that encompasses that.
So, although sometimes throughout history people can lose sight of the actual meaning, such meanings after close examination can be brought back to life. Whenever amen is used, it is meant to convey in terms of volition the agreement to the absolute truth of what is said.
In a way, it is a testament to the power of retention of the word and perhaps it's meaning as well, although it may differ from man to man in terms of intensity.
Lost in translation is a thing. But apparently, we as a verbal species have the capacity to retain more than we appreciate.
Beautiful description of the issue!
This is a major issue in Education. Over time, all layers of the profession have had their vocabulary 'deconstructed' a la Derrida, lauding an Algerian philosopher whose central focus was his circumcision. In fact, the loose use of Derrida is an insult, since his words are used to obfuscate ideas on Education.
The worst part of it isn't the laws, it's the social attitude and perception change that go with it that is the real problem.
They tend to use false flags and misrepresentation of real events to effect this change and they often do it with words and concepts that are threat or otherwise problematic to them and their agenda.
The changing of the terms anarchy/anarchist is a good example of this, if it hadn't been for this the libertarian party may very well have been named the anarchist party without that in any way being perceived in a negative way as they are the political party that is closest to the old-school(rather than DS-morphed) definition of anarchism(an absence of government and people having absolute self-determination), should be fairly obvious why this is a problem for the DS/Kazahrians....
It changes the definition of obscenity as well.
Psychology is very good at doing this, as well as English professors in higher education.
You broke the code. Don't ever submit to their made-up words or their redefinitions of words that have had the same clear meaning for centuries. Call out their stupid multi-syllabic explanations of things that should be simple to understand in plain language. They do it to make themselves look smarter than you. Don't fall for it. They are just liars who can't explain anything when you nail them down.
for example, the term "income"
It isn't enough to study founding documents and statements from early, righteous leaders. They must be studied in the context, assumptions, and expectations of the original writers and speakers.
It is a trait that the Constitution has in common with the holy scriptures. Given that our rights come from a Good who inspired the men who wrote the Constitution, this isn't a light matter.
One of the advantages of a dead language (like Latin) is that it does not evolve or change with the times. The english we are speaking now is not the same english we were speaking even 10 years ago. So many new words have been introduced and new meanings attached to old words (wtf does vibing mean?).
u/BidenIsAPedoFreak: You noticed very important thing anon.
Chinese "reform" of language had also such purpose : to murder the ways of the old. Biggest damage Mao's cultural revolution did to Chinese culture was "reform" of Chinese language. Today continental Chinese despite claiming they are culture having thousands of years are people without their roots...
Dear Lord, you are the FIRST person I have seen to make that connection. Been tryna tell people this for years now, it's so in-your-face-obvious but no one wanted to hear it.
Digital high-five to you, pede, well done!
Excellent observation.
Yup 💯
yes they are scoundrel's
Judeo-christian values was a good one that emerged in the 60s, to be replaced with whiteness once that served it's purpose.
The Queen of England is the arbiter of the meaning of words in the dictionary. Legalese is a fictitious language with words with multiple meanings that give the judges latitude to pick the meaning they want ten years later. Makes all contracts useless. Useless language. You are really onto something budddy. UPDOOT
It’s “literally” that simple. (If you get it, you get it 😎KEK)
Which words specifically are you concerned have changed their legal meaning?
Things like “crisis” and “death” and “democracy” and “dangerous” and “responsibility” and “truth” and “science” etc
The entire clown world talking heads and their book of buzzwords
It’s all upside down and backwards. On purpose! In order to enact ulterior policies not rooted in base reality.
Aka the 2nd amendment.
Hell, the first amendment! Wtf!
Civil rights? Tolerance? The word “rights” is even conflated with “wants”
The whole show is designed to change meaning of even our most based ideals
Calling something a vaccination is a quick way to get someone to defend it.
Even though vaccinations are like any other drug, and can cause permanent harm and even death.
They have always lied about vaccines. And anyone who questions vaccine safety is labeled an Antivaxxer.
The definition of herd immunity for 1
infanticide for one. Legislation was changed wherever it was, someone else will know, to make a baby delivered then aborted "not murder" by way of changing what a person was. Some...thing, that is not a legal person doesn't have human rights apparently.
Racism and racist in one dictionary is now self referencing.
Sex / Gender
"abusive"
"hate"
Not to mention, marriage; person; etc. They are slowly changing the meaning of many words that will change a lot. My husband and I noticed this a while ago...
The term “well regulated” used to mean “well maintained.” Now the average person thinks that regulated means to be controlled. Guess which amendment they’re targeting with that one?
2nd of course.