doctors are telling people they're getting a vaccine but giving an experimental gene therapy instead, I'm not sure how this is different from your example.. are you agreeing with us?
Informed consent is different from deceiving a patient. The bait and switch is what I have a problem with. Instead if she had provided the patients information about the vaccine and allowed them to make up their own mind, I would not have a problem. The deception is the issue.
can you really give informed consent if you have a family to support and your job or government requires injecting unknown substances into your body to keep that job? I don't think so, and big pharma doesn't disclose or have liability. the problem with your analogy is saline is 100% proven to be safe, and used as a placebo. Removing a kidney is obviously not, nor are experimental drugs.
Big pharma has not given information to people such that they can make an informed decision. I agree with you on that. People that are more or less being forced to choose between their job and their health freedom have been placed in a terrible position, everyone should have the choice.
The saline is safe, yes, but it was not what the patients agreed to be injected with. Its a moral issue. Am issue of deceiving someone whom you are supposed to trust. If I go to get a tetanus shot and they give me a flu vaccine instead, I'd be pretty angry, it was not what I asked for. This is my issue, not that the saline was safe or not, but that she deceived her patients.
When this goes to the court, the nurse will be able to defend herself, by asking what exactly is in this vaccine (not a vaccine). Informed consent works both ways.
This is akin to someone telling Jews when entering the showers its only a shower. As opposed to telling the, its only a shower when in fact its a gas chamber that will lead to certain death. We are at war, and this nurse gets it.
So because they won't know the difference, it doesn't matter that they were decieved? If someone lies to me, I need to know, so that I do not trust that person any longer. I refuse to not learn from mistakes.
You can justify this saying we are at war and all options should be on the table, but we are talking about our fellow human beings. We are supposed to be coming together, not deceiving. How do you think these people will view this nurse and people like us after they find out they were deceived. Do you think they will now have any chance to be convinced to come to our side? (yes j know they probably wouldn't since they were already getting the shot, but what if the nurse had given them jnfo or warnings ahead of giving the shot, rather than just deceiving them?)
Why would she as a nurse be obliged to build trust in big pharma. Her oath is not to big pharma. Her oath is to not harming people but helping them.
Putting a needle in an arm and administer a solution with:
Gene therapie
Graphen Oxyde
aadjuvants like SM102 that should NOT EVER NEVER be injected into a marine environment. And our bodies ARE a marine environment!
is causing harm.
Are you with the program?
S-1 cannot die in the body. It will amass. And cause problems down the line.
Quite sure: you would simply do the job. She made a statement. I am sure she will pay for it. But ... her statement will further bring the message out.
It does not deserve public trust. As an example, we now have MILLIONS of autistic kids in America, whose lives were RUINED by having poisonous vaccines administered to them. Puh-leez!!
The thing about placebos is you're not supposed to know you get them. The whole vaccine is an experiment so they need to use placebos. This was probably planned and she was thrown under the bus to cover up the mass human trials currently happening. If they volunteer to be part of the vaccine experiment then by extension they volunteer for the potential for a placebo.
doctors are telling people they're getting a vaccine but giving an experimental gene therapy instead, I'm not sure how this is different from your example.. are you agreeing with us?
Informed consent is different from deceiving a patient. The bait and switch is what I have a problem with. Instead if she had provided the patients information about the vaccine and allowed them to make up their own mind, I would not have a problem. The deception is the issue.
can you really give informed consent if you have a family to support and your job or government requires injecting unknown substances into your body to keep that job? I don't think so, and big pharma doesn't disclose or have liability. the problem with your analogy is saline is 100% proven to be safe, and used as a placebo. Removing a kidney is obviously not, nor are experimental drugs.
Big pharma has not given information to people such that they can make an informed decision. I agree with you on that. People that are more or less being forced to choose between their job and their health freedom have been placed in a terrible position, everyone should have the choice.
The saline is safe, yes, but it was not what the patients agreed to be injected with. Its a moral issue. Am issue of deceiving someone whom you are supposed to trust. If I go to get a tetanus shot and they give me a flu vaccine instead, I'd be pretty angry, it was not what I asked for. This is my issue, not that the saline was safe or not, but that she deceived her patients.
When this goes to the court, the nurse will be able to defend herself, by asking what exactly is in this vaccine (not a vaccine). Informed consent works both ways.
This is akin to someone telling Jews when entering the showers its only a shower. As opposed to telling the, its only a shower when in fact its a gas chamber that will lead to certain death. We are at war, and this nurse gets it.
The deception came from the ones who created the gene therapy and then called it a vaccine. THEY are the guilty ones.
Agree with those here that she is a hero, but once again, this is not “gene therapy”
True. It's graphene oxide poisoning.
I absolutely agree with this statement.
war is war bro
i commend this hero.
none of these people will even know the difference since apparently vaccinated people catch "covid" just the same as anyone else.
The vaxxed make the covid. Util the Vax there was NO covid. It was all psyops.
So because they won't know the difference, it doesn't matter that they were decieved? If someone lies to me, I need to know, so that I do not trust that person any longer. I refuse to not learn from mistakes.
You can justify this saying we are at war and all options should be on the table, but we are talking about our fellow human beings. We are supposed to be coming together, not deceiving. How do you think these people will view this nurse and people like us after they find out they were deceived. Do you think they will now have any chance to be convinced to come to our side? (yes j know they probably wouldn't since they were already getting the shot, but what if the nurse had given them jnfo or warnings ahead of giving the shot, rather than just deceiving them?)
You are seriously stupid. She saved their lives. Fuck off until you can think logically.
Yes she saved lives, while doing nothing to build trust in an industry that will soon loose all public trust.
Huh?
Why would she as a nurse be obliged to build trust in big pharma. Her oath is not to big pharma. Her oath is to not harming people but helping them.
Putting a needle in an arm and administer a solution with:
is causing harm.
Are you with the program?
S-1 cannot die in the body. It will amass. And cause problems down the line.
Quite sure: you would simply do the job. She made a statement. I am sure she will pay for it. But ... her statement will further bring the message out.
It does not deserve public trust. As an example, we now have MILLIONS of autistic kids in America, whose lives were RUINED by having poisonous vaccines administered to them. Puh-leez!!
It doesn't deserve our trust. It's evil through and through. NOW FUCK OFF TROLL. ENOUGH FORUM SLIDING.
Placebos exist
So do patients rights.
The thing about placebos is you're not supposed to know you get them. The whole vaccine is an experiment so they need to use placebos. This was probably planned and she was thrown under the bus to cover up the mass human trials currently happening. If they volunteer to be part of the vaccine experiment then by extension they volunteer for the potential for a placebo.
Oh yeah! A genocidal jab!