I think I follow you... but, could you elaborate? Are you saying that if Durham has produced sealed indictments that those have no statute of limitations? Or are you saying any sealed indictment that could tie into Durham 's stuff would keep him active?
Example: Crime is committed Jul. 4, 2016. 5 year Statute of Limitations would mean you have until Jul. 3, 2021 to file charges or it's too bad, so sad.
Federal grand jury is empaneled on Jun. 14, 2018 for the above crime. And same day, files indictment which is sealed.
SoL clock STOPS.
Indictment can be unsealed after original SoL expiration date and prosecuted as if no time had passed since it was sealed.
Also: Durham waiting until last minute to drop this rather small charge in the grand scheme of things is an absolute confirmation that Sussmann has been cooperating and they wanted to keep it under wraps.
Sussmann was effectively charged with jaywalking. Now let's see what those lesser charges has earned him in the form of singing like a canary.
That would be true, if no previous GJ has been empaneled on the matter and voted to indict.
Remember, we were looking at an astronomical number of sealed federal records during the early days of Q. Some mistakenly assumed ALL were indictments, which is highly unlikely. Simplest explanation is that many (speculated as 90%?) of sealed docs could be supporting records that follow specific indictments.
Alternatively, a single sealed indictment could name 50 people.
Does this apply to a military court of law? Because everything he is investigating falls under the Constitutional definition of treason. Pretty sure there's no time limit on that. I don't see why the military would be unable to use his investigation, evidence and materials to expedite tribunals. Quite frankly with the courts being commie cucks,the federal court system is not an appropriate place for this to end up since we are dealing with treason.
The Military Courts could decide to use any evidence found if they choose, but as far as Hillary and her scam, it would still fall under Federal jurisdiction and be held to all their rules.
This one incident with this one suspect was about to limit out, it doesn’t mean all other suspects and their infractions have a similar timeframe. There could also be sealed indictments that were made within the statute of limitations. And, of course, treason has no statute of limitations.
That would also assume no ongoing activity after the initial crime. If activity continues as in a Rico case and the statute of limitations is on going as well. IANAL.
Sadly I'm starting to feel you are correct.
I've been in this fight for several years, and have always been the hopium giver, but it seems I have given away all I could muster for the time.
Let's see what the next couple days bring.
Sealed indictments stop the clock on statute of limitations.
Any chance this was a sealed indictment that was actually unsealed for optics?
I think I follow you... but, could you elaborate? Are you saying that if Durham has produced sealed indictments that those have no statute of limitations? Or are you saying any sealed indictment that could tie into Durham 's stuff would keep him active?
Example: Crime is committed Jul. 4, 2016. 5 year Statute of Limitations would mean you have until Jul. 3, 2021 to file charges or it's too bad, so sad.
Federal grand jury is empaneled on Jun. 14, 2018 for the above crime. And same day, files indictment which is sealed.
SoL clock STOPS.
Indictment can be unsealed after original SoL expiration date and prosecuted as if no time had passed since it was sealed.
Also: Durham waiting until last minute to drop this rather small charge in the grand scheme of things is an absolute confirmation that Sussmann has been cooperating and they wanted to keep it under wraps.
Sussmann was effectively charged with jaywalking. Now let's see what those lesser charges has earned him in the form of singing like a canary.
Got it. Thanks. So we just have to pray that Durham has a whole bunch of sealed indictments related to all of this.
This
This
I hope so, but listening to several conservative/MAGA radio hosts today, they all pointed at Sunday as the deadline.
That would be true, if no previous GJ has been empaneled on the matter and voted to indict.
Remember, we were looking at an astronomical number of sealed federal records during the early days of Q. Some mistakenly assumed ALL were indictments, which is highly unlikely. Simplest explanation is that many (speculated as 90%?) of sealed docs could be supporting records that follow specific indictments.
Alternatively, a single sealed indictment could name 50 people.
Does this apply to a military court of law? Because everything he is investigating falls under the Constitutional definition of treason. Pretty sure there's no time limit on that. I don't see why the military would be unable to use his investigation, evidence and materials to expedite tribunals. Quite frankly with the courts being commie cucks,the federal court system is not an appropriate place for this to end up since we are dealing with treason.
The Military Courts could decide to use any evidence found if they choose, but as far as Hillary and her scam, it would still fall under Federal jurisdiction and be held to all their rules.
😂🤣😂
Well ... this thread didn't age well at all.
Indictment already a done deal.
LOL
Actually it aged quite well. Check the time stamp. I called this 3 hours before the indictment was released.
This one incident with this one suspect was about to limit out, it doesn’t mean all other suspects and their infractions have a similar timeframe. There could also be sealed indictments that were made within the statute of limitations. And, of course, treason has no statute of limitations.
Are whitehats able to set traps too?
I dont understand waiting to the last minute. Accidents seem to happen so easily these days.
That would also assume no ongoing activity after the initial crime. If activity continues as in a Rico case and the statute of limitations is on going as well. IANAL.
Until proven otherwise, that’s the approach I’m talking.
I’ll believe it as soon as I see it in regards to meaningful arrests (Comey, Clinton, Podesta, etc, etc)
Sadly I'm starting to feel you are correct. I've been in this fight for several years, and have always been the hopium giver, but it seems I have given away all I could muster for the time. Let's see what the next couple days bring.
Once she dies, her real problems are only beginning.
We may or may not see justice on earth in our lifetimes, but she will be brought to justice and judged by God.
Amen!
Cackling