Dan Andrews said that Victorian construction workers couldn't eat inside if they weren't vaccinated... Well they grabbed everything, took it to the streets and blocked the roads off 💁♂️ they even got Traffic control stopping Police 😂😂
I’m not in the construction industry, but I know these guys have no problem eating anywhere… even if there is a lunch room available. Joke is on AUS govt
People should do this everywhere. Every business or factory that mandates. Block all entry and exits. Every government building. every bank. every courthouse. every news station. all the big box stores. shopping malls.
Considering how brutal the Victorian police are if people aren't wearing masks (throwing elderly people, macing kids, beating people) what else do you expect.
Protesting police "brutality" only works if you're black.
When BLM were protesting, they weren't protesting something at the location they were blocking off, save for the GF Memorial Square Retard Zone they set up.
They didn't keep it to that area, in fact, they blocked traffic in the street in countries that had nothing to do with Africans let alone Americans.
This is directly outside of their construction zone. Where else were they supposed to eat? You can't eat on a live construction zone, so they had no choice.
Off the road to the side? Or at least only block off a single side of the road. Not creating a massive wall that prevents people who have nothing to do with what they're protesting from going about their day and lives.
Ah. No.
Everyone in Melbourne has to do with this protest, since the rules effect the entire Victorian population. Melbourne is mostly locked down atm because of Andrews' insane rules. They'll also be locked out of healthcare, clubs, jobs, pubs, restaurants, retail, travel and schools if unvaccinated. So "go about their daily lives" is disrupted completely by Andrews' insane edicts.
Everyone in Victoria is effected by this and no one's daily lives are allowed to go back to normal regardless. The protest mirrors the problem.
BLM protests were about disruption for a questionable social issue. Blocking streets for them was not in direct protest of an mirrorable action. It's a false dichotomy to equate the two.
Your logic is flawed because you based it on a false premise to begin with.
What I meant is that the people they're blocking on the street are not the people they're protesting against. The random dude in his car in the photo, for example, didn't enact a bunch of tyrannical bullshit so why is he getting fucked over? He's already having his day-to-day screwed by the tyrannical government so why is double screwing him by blocking the street the correct action in the situation? It's already hard enough for people to do anything without other people blocking the street.
Rules for thee but not for me is what this sounds like to me. The rules only apply when they're convenient. When they aren't they're simply ignored. Sounds like the exact same way BLM thinks.
We have rules and laws for a reason. Blocking the streets while protesting is either okay or not okay. The reason is irrelevant and the rules apply to everybody the same. If it's allowed then BLM blocking the streets is fine. The only remaining problem was the violent nature of their "protests'.
To expand, It doesn't matter if your protest is valid or not (e.g. the people protesting in the OP vs BLM riots), blocking the streets only fucks over other people who did nothing wrong and may even agree with your protest. If you want to block a road that only the government (or whoever else you're protesting against) uses to prevent them from doing whatever they might be doing that's one thing, but why fuck over your fellow citizens by blocking the regular roads they use?
Makes me smile
Civics Lesson: This is what the governed look like when they withdraw their consent.
Well done Diggers!
o7
Sun on their faces
Fresh air
Back at you, God bless
Dan Andrews said that Victorian construction workers couldn't eat inside if they weren't vaccinated... Well they grabbed everything, took it to the streets and blocked the roads off 💁♂️ they even got Traffic control stopping Police 😂😂
Well done Tradies!
https://t.me/thefive8take/5890
Multiple shots. Civil disobedience at its finest.
More footage, different source.
https://files.catbox.moe/44368z.MP4
Be ungovernable. I love it. Keep it up, lads!
I’m not in the construction industry, but I know these guys have no problem eating anywhere… even if there is a lunch room available. Joke is on AUS govt
I'll eat wherever I want. On a roof, in ditch, on a tailgate, doesn't matter. Tell me where I can't eat, and I'll want to eat there.
I love these kinda posts.
Let me know where I can find a link to the story if they’re reporting on it.
https://files.catbox.moe/kaff6b.webm
Literally the definition of no fucks given. An inspired idea!
Nice work construction-bros.
Awesome!
Added benefit, smokers can have their after meal cigarette without having to get up and walk outside. Smoke 'em if you got 'em.
Great job Patriots!
Mike Nolan has left the building...
https://youtu.be/uuc9frxacfE
All they needed was for Sassy to roll up with his magic cart and it would've been a day of days.
But seriously, Fuck Dan Andrews. Commie Traitor.
whatayatalkinabeet?
FTC mate. Film The Cops.
Wanna go ta Cabba!!!
Their reaction warmed my heart!
People should do this everywhere. Every business or factory that mandates. Block all entry and exits. Every government building. every bank. every courthouse. every news station. all the big box stores. shopping malls.
The Aussie Patriots should feel very proud of what they are doing!!!!!
WINNING
It's OK to hang the oxygen thrives in the government.
Construction workers will never comply.
its like ok, well there is 300 of us. where the fuck else are we going to eat if the site is inside officers? IDK BUT NOT HERE IN THE SITE.
they brought it on themselves. these are victorias police too. its been said that at the moment they are pretty wicked right now
What's up with all the dudes in short shorts?
But still wearing masks.
Considering how brutal the Victorian police are if people aren't wearing masks (throwing elderly people, macing kids, beating people) what else do you expect. Protesting police "brutality" only works if you're black.
Truth. Apologies
That's the way to do it mates!
Love it!
NYC, your turn.🙌🏻
Any reason why they're still wearing the face diapers? Just take them off while they're at it?
Or is it because they will be arrested if they don't wear one?
awesome
I guess blocking off the streets is only bad and not a legitimate way to protest when BLM does it. Hmm, the more you know.
When BLM were protesting, they weren't protesting something at the location they were blocking off, save for the GF Memorial Square Retard Zone they set up. They didn't keep it to that area, in fact, they blocked traffic in the street in countries that had nothing to do with Africans let alone Americans.
This is directly outside of their construction zone. Where else were they supposed to eat? You can't eat on a live construction zone, so they had no choice.
Proximity ; Therefore, it's valid.
Off the road to the side? Or at least only block off a single side of the road. Not creating a massive wall that prevents people who have nothing to do with what they're protesting from going about their day and lives.
Ah. No. Everyone in Melbourne has to do with this protest, since the rules effect the entire Victorian population. Melbourne is mostly locked down atm because of Andrews' insane rules. They'll also be locked out of healthcare, clubs, jobs, pubs, restaurants, retail, travel and schools if unvaccinated. So "go about their daily lives" is disrupted completely by Andrews' insane edicts.
Everyone in Victoria is effected by this and no one's daily lives are allowed to go back to normal regardless. The protest mirrors the problem.
BLM protests were about disruption for a questionable social issue. Blocking streets for them was not in direct protest of an mirrorable action. It's a false dichotomy to equate the two.
Your logic is flawed because you based it on a false premise to begin with.
What I meant is that the people they're blocking on the street are not the people they're protesting against. The random dude in his car in the photo, for example, didn't enact a bunch of tyrannical bullshit so why is he getting fucked over? He's already having his day-to-day screwed by the tyrannical government so why is double screwing him by blocking the street the correct action in the situation? It's already hard enough for people to do anything without other people blocking the street.
Rules for thee but not for me is what this sounds like to me. The rules only apply when they're convenient. When they aren't they're simply ignored. Sounds like the exact same way BLM thinks.
We have rules and laws for a reason. Blocking the streets while protesting is either okay or not okay. The reason is irrelevant and the rules apply to everybody the same. If it's allowed then BLM blocking the streets is fine. The only remaining problem was the violent nature of their "protests'.
It's hard for you but hopefully when you grow up it gets worse.now run on home before its dark.
That isn't a counterargument.
To expand, It doesn't matter if your protest is valid or not (e.g. the people protesting in the OP vs BLM riots), blocking the streets only fucks over other people who did nothing wrong and may even agree with your protest. If you want to block a road that only the government (or whoever else you're protesting against) uses to prevent them from doing whatever they might be doing that's one thing, but why fuck over your fellow citizens by blocking the regular roads they use?