It’s incredible how the courts maneuver to avoid controversial cases. And each time they arbitrarily apply one of their excuses they cause injury to all of us.
The courts can say a case was brought to early, that it is not “ripe” with the end result being we have to suffer under a potentially unconstitutional situation instead of them preempting it.
Or they can cite laches, saying the case was brought too late. Result? We have to continue suffering under an unconstitutional situation indefinitely. How is that right?
And then there is standing. How is it possible in a constitutional Republic, that Texas did not have standing to sue the states that conducted unconstitutional elections? It’s not possible. We all know that. The Texas case was solid and it forced the hand of SCOTUS because it bypasses the lower courts.
Maybe they did? Very possible. But the Texas case against the other states was based on the fact the Governors, Secretaries of State, and even Election Clerks arbitrarily changed state election laws.
This is a power the constitution reserves to State Legislatures; therefore, the elections in those states were not only fraudulent, they were also unconstitutional. Texas may have had fraud, but it wouldn’t cause them to lack standing.
Courts are so fucked up. Rules made it clear you weren't welcome so you didn't even try? "No damage, no standing, fuck off." You have to throw yourself at the system and get ground up on purpose so you can challenge the system. The only people that have time to do that are minorities with nothing to lose. And people to finance their cases.
However, he said "we" have a lawsuit coming in 4-5 weeks.
If he's working with the audit, etc. then "we" could mean Arizona v. US
Neither Lindell nor Arizona can challenge how Wisconsin runs Wisconsin's elections, but Arizona might have standing to challenge how Congress counted Arizona's electoral votes (or lack of electoral votes).
If they (Arizona) says, "Wait, we never cast any electors! Those were fraudulent electors. The legislature never approved that..." That sounds like a different question.
Satan tries to use people's pasts against them. Past drug addict is current commie defeater. Biden cheated. Everyone knows it. Arizona will prove it. So you will need to get a job and work for a living becuase there will be no communism here and no free stuff for you.
One does not present a case to the Supreme Court. It needs to go thru 3 or 4 layers of Appeals thru Local, State and Districts which takes time. Likewise the Supreme Court does not find guilt or innocence just cancels lower court rulings. It's basically like a penalty / replay review in Fooseball.
Generally speaking, that is true. However, Lindell says this case will be brought by various states' AGs, which means the states themselves will be parties. That gives SCOTUS original jurisdiction.
In all Cases ... in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make. -- US Constitution, Article 3, Section 2
He's lost money in this fight. One sells product by simply advertising. Yet you seem to be a Communist, and I know they do not understand how the market works. You wait for the government to do everything.
It really isn't how it works.. It has to wind its way thru 3-4 layers / decisions and then John Roberts has to decide whether to adjudicate on it at all. Yes. JOHN ROBERTS.
How do you "bring a case to the Supreme Court"? I don't know of any other way than to work your (long, tedious, expensive) case up through the entire court system. And then the court has to accept it. It's not as simple as it sounds.
Lindell has his heart in the right place but he is in the clouds on his comfy pillow.
He promises the moon and the stars and delivers a big wet fart... again and again. Trump might regain office soon but I doubt Mike's efforts will be a part of it. He continues to embarrass and hurt the cause. If any of us promised what he continuously does and failed as spectacularly we'd have been banned.
I’ll save you the time and emotional investment: “he has no standing”
It’s incredible how the courts maneuver to avoid controversial cases. And each time they arbitrarily apply one of their excuses they cause injury to all of us.
The courts can say a case was brought to early, that it is not “ripe” with the end result being we have to suffer under a potentially unconstitutional situation instead of them preempting it.
Or they can cite laches, saying the case was brought too late. Result? We have to continue suffering under an unconstitutional situation indefinitely. How is that right?
And then there is standing. How is it possible in a constitutional Republic, that Texas did not have standing to sue the states that conducted unconstitutional elections? It’s not possible. We all know that. The Texas case was solid and it forced the hand of SCOTUS because it bypasses the lower courts.
Perhaps because Texas too had the same fraud as the other states? Just had the preferred outcome with Trump winning the state?
Maybe they did? Very possible. But the Texas case against the other states was based on the fact the Governors, Secretaries of State, and even Election Clerks arbitrarily changed state election laws.
This is a power the constitution reserves to State Legislatures; therefore, the elections in those states were not only fraudulent, they were also unconstitutional. Texas may have had fraud, but it wouldn’t cause them to lack standing.
Like these?
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/texas-woman-arrested-on-election-fraud-charges-based-on-project-veritas-video/ar-BB1cJ5tk
https://gellerreport.com/2020/10/democrat-judge-voter-fraud-houston.html/?fbclid=IwAR2Wv9PQcfNUj9vxeZJ8eKAl0lyX3NLtZhRuPTYF5xvQTySMzi0MbUGPBlU
several more can be found.
Let’s sue the Supreme Court for causing irreparable harm due to inaction. I wonder if that’s possible.
Courts are so fucked up. Rules made it clear you weren't welcome so you didn't even try? "No damage, no standing, fuck off." You have to throw yourself at the system and get ground up on purpose so you can challenge the system. The only people that have time to do that are minorities with nothing to lose. And people to finance their cases.
Yes, they'd throw out Lindell v. ...
However, he said "we" have a lawsuit coming in 4-5 weeks.
If he's working with the audit, etc. then "we" could mean Arizona v. US
Neither Lindell nor Arizona can challenge how Wisconsin runs Wisconsin's elections, but Arizona might have standing to challenge how Congress counted Arizona's electoral votes (or lack of electoral votes).
If they (Arizona) says, "Wait, we never cast any electors! Those were fraudulent electors. The legislature never approved that..." That sounds like a different question.
Go back to pdw
Must be new here
I do have to wonder that Mike probably has more info than we know about in order to attempt a case before the SC.
He’s putting his life and livelihood on the line, he’s got something or he’s nuts
Why not both?
That's a mighty bold accusation handshake. I assume you have some proof that he is on drugs? Yeah I didn't think so. Go back to your soy latte.
Satan tries to use people's pasts against them. Past drug addict is current commie defeater. Biden cheated. Everyone knows it. Arizona will prove it. So you will need to get a job and work for a living becuase there will be no communism here and no free stuff for you.
Deporting.
That’s your purpose in life, I’m sure.
You’re a complete loser if this is your hobby. Save yourself, dumbass!
These guys have been right more often than CNN, the New York Times, or any other so called Mainstream source. And they are right about election fraud.
One does not present a case to the Supreme Court. It needs to go thru 3 or 4 layers of Appeals thru Local, State and Districts which takes time. Likewise the Supreme Court does not find guilt or innocence just cancels lower court rulings. It's basically like a penalty / replay review in Fooseball.
Generally speaking, that is true. However, Lindell says this case will be brought by various states' AGs, which means the states themselves will be parties. That gives SCOTUS original jurisdiction.
He's lost money in this fight. One sells product by simply advertising. Yet you seem to be a Communist, and I know they do not understand how the market works. You wait for the government to do everything.
I love pillowman!! God Bless and keep him safe! They are putting him through the ringer but he keeps fighting!
How does one go directly to the Supreme court? I thought there was quite a lengthy process of lower courts to advance through...
That is indeed how it works. Lindell is talking out his ass here.
I see nothing in this article that suggests the Supreme Court has agreed to take the case.
Discovery can be fun.
-- Paraphrase Q
The Cyber Symposium was eye opening, but careful with the hopium on this, it isn't how SCOTUS works.
It really isn't how it works.. It has to wind its way thru 3-4 layers / decisions and then John Roberts has to decide whether to adjudicate on it at all. Yes. JOHN ROBERTS.
Yes he explained it on warroom. He has been working with multiple red states
It has to be initiated in a lower court also.
Waste of time and money the only hope right now is these Audits....
Maybe military is behind arranging this?
I am doing research on Mike Lindell for a post. Last night I found some interesting things that are not/could not be coincidences.
Such as?
How do you "bring a case to the Supreme Court"? I don't know of any other way than to work your (long, tedious, expensive) case up through the entire court system. And then the court has to accept it. It's not as simple as it sounds.
I like pillows, and I like Trump. What's not to love about Lindell!
Lindell has his heart in the right place but he is in the clouds on his comfy pillow.
He promises the moon and the stars and delivers a big wet fart... again and again. Trump might regain office soon but I doubt Mike's efforts will be a part of it. He continues to embarrass and hurt the cause. If any of us promised what he continuously does and failed as spectacularly we'd have been banned.
Perhaps, you are on the wrong forum?
i think youre lost. patriots.win is your home, or maybe just reddit.com