TRUST THE PLAN. IT IS UNFOLDING. But, OK, bois and xirls, what's next in that plan? Indictments? Prosecutions in AZ? The audit still has things to drop that weren't presented, Friday. Do those come out, and then something else happens? What would that be? And Durham is rolling, does that accelerate?
(media.greatawakening.win)
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
No. The enthe Cabinet is in the line of succession.
The impeachment will likely include the entire Cabinet. The Constitution allows for the impeachment of any civil federal officer.
Correct.
You can be impeached and stay in office. It's happened to the president three times in my lifetime.
The entire cabinet would most likely involve a series of separate impeachments.
Good point. The Conviction vote in the Senate is what removes them, not just being impeached.
What about the vote requirement - current house won't impeach, current senate won't convict.
States are allowed to recall and replace their representatives. So I guess that would need to be completed first.
How do you impeach the entire cabinet?
If the Secretary of the Treasury was impeached how would that affect the secretary of energy??
Does the election fraud remove the entire administration?
This post says it doesn't.
I think the post is hopium at best.
I mean Sidney Powell's lawsuit is a civil suit, not criminal. And she's the one being sued.....that going to prove foreign interference in elections???
Yes, through the discovery process. It doesn't matter if it's civil or criminal, evidence is evidence. A judge will allow its admission, and the MSM will be forced to acknowledge it, and CISA will be required to investigate it.
It also doesn't matter that it's Sydney Powell doing this. This isn't hero worship, she just happens to be the legal actor bringing this in front of a judge.
This is what I am taking about. This is a bunch of thing you hope would happen. Note how many times you note something WILL happen, not might, but will happen. And you're leaving out some steps.
For one you assume the evidence will surface in the lawsuit. Why wouldn't they just not hand it over or destroy it? Ok let's assume it does
So CISA (which was created by Congress, btw) investigates......then? They are not law enforcement. They would turn over their findings to the FBI/DOJ.
That still doesn't lead the US becomes Myanmar
I thought she was countersuing?
I think it is more likely that Dems lose the house and Senate in 22 and trump becomes speaker. At that point at least you have a reasonable line of succession via impeachment, and impeachment is actually possible
You still need to convict an impeached President to re move him. And a simple majority doesn't get you there. You need 2/3 of the Senate
This would be great but with corrupt voting systems, that won't happen. So I think the best thing that can happen between now and midterms is to get so much proven voter fraud out in the open that the military would have to run future elections.
Then I could see this as a very viable option of Trump becoming speaker.
elections will still be corrupt in 2022, as will be the politicians running for office.
The entire cabinet can be removed via impeachment if they're culpable. These traitors tend to surround themselves with fellow traitors.
Culpable of what though? What crime would ensnare them all?
I think is a list of things you hope would happen, not a list of things that are likely or even possible to happen.
For example, impeachment alone doesn't remove the president. Conviction by 2/3 of the Senate does.
Also the military running the country is not possible under the Constitution. The Republic is gone by that point
Biden is guilty of the crime of abetting an enemy combatant, specifically China. Biden is a puppet that China installed through interference with our elections, which also included the use of a biological weapon, which means we are currently at war with China. This also designates Biden as an enemy combatant as defined by the US Law of War manual. Biden's illegal relationship with China is corroborated by details in Hunter Biden's laptop and interviews with Biden's former business partner, Tony Bobulinski.
Since these traitors always surround themselves with fellow traitors, it's a very safe bet that his entire cabinet is compromised as well. You may be surprised by how many of our elites and political class have traveled to China to be wined and dined by the CCP. It was the "elite capture" of both Democrats and Republicans.
Since we are now at war, the US military running the country is a legal process as defined by the Law of War manual. Since Washington DC is a city-state currently occupied by enemy combatants, it is currently considered occupied territory. When Biden is arrested and the US military fills the vacuum, section 11.2.2.2 provides justification for the military assuming authority:
So the military can take control of DC as an occupying force, then implement martial law for enemy combatants, and Constitutional law for non-combatants. They could even assume control without anyone knowing if they choose to.
So when the public is made aware that Biden, Harris, and his entire staff have been COLLUDING (there's that word) with China and had knowledge of the covid bioweapon, a 2/3 majority of the Senate to impeach seems like a realistic expectation.
https://tjaglcspublic.army.mil/documents/27431/61281/DoD+Law+of+War+Manual+-+June+2015+Updated+Dec+2016/5a02f6f8-eff3-4e79-a46f-9cd7aac74a95
Not to mention, that probably 2/3 of Congress and the Senate will also be removed for COLLUSION too
Exactly this 👆u/Mister_Winston!
You may want to read that manual again. A combatant is the equivalent of a soldier. China would be an enemy not an enemy combatant. We are not at War with China and this is important legally for a charge of treason. We didn't have any charges of treason during the cold war. The Rosenbergs were not tried for treason, but espionage in a Federal Court, not a military tribunal.
Biden or any member of Congress or any civilian not found on a battlefield would not be designated an enemy combatant because they were not subject to military jurisprudence before their arrest. The Universal Code of Military Justice is quite clear on this. See Article 2 of the UCMJ. They would face trial in a regular civilian court. The ISIS TRUCK ATTACK on NYC in 2017 is going through federal, not military courts.
The military is currently running the country?
Who? What's the name of the officer in charge of the country. Is it more than one? What branch?