NO bc it is ‘their’ term, we don’t play their games; ‘qanon’ is a term they created to control the narrative, so when anyone looks into Q, all they come across first is everything the media has flooded with ‘qanon’. It muddies the waters between what Q has said and what any account with ‘qanon’ in it has said; demoralizes when ppl wrongly equate the two and then are wrong. Quit playing their game.
People who study and research info that Q points to are Q students (Q-dents, you could say, if someone just invented the word for that purpose. :)
Seriously, Q said that CIA invented the term "Q Anon" as a device to link Q to the actions of random anons. Then bad actors pretending to be patriot anons can be used to commit violence and mayhem so as to discredit Q in the eyes of the public. They are obsessed with this leader-follower theme where Q is the evil terrorist guru who is vilified insanely, so later his info about the baby-eating, child-trafficking cabal will be disbelieved.
There’s no Qanon.
Simply put, the term QAnon is a media created term to classify conspiracy theorists. In real terms, there is Q and there are Anons.
If you check out Q posts, "Qanon" is always in quotation marks.
That's for a reason.
An anonymous of Q?
You're trying to make a point but failing because what you're suggesting doesn't even make sense on its own.
Because there is nothing "of Q"...
99% of legit Anons were Anon prior to Q ever coming to pass.
i wanted to upvote this comment but it already had 17 upvotes - so i wrote this instead :)
Not if the defining characteristic of the relationship is Q literally pointing out to make a distinction.
Qanon is what the media have labelled it in order to confuse the issue.
How does one "Follow" Q?
Q stopped posting almost 1 year ago.
You can Follow Anderson Cooper... or Tucker... but not Q. The crumbs stopped.
NO bc it is ‘their’ term, we don’t play their games; ‘qanon’ is a term they created to control the narrative, so when anyone looks into Q, all they come across first is everything the media has flooded with ‘qanon’. It muddies the waters between what Q has said and what any account with ‘qanon’ in it has said; demoralizes when ppl wrongly equate the two and then are wrong. Quit playing their game.
If you want to label it, then label it:
"Truth Anons"
People who study and research info that Q points to are Q students (Q-dents, you could say, if someone just invented the word for that purpose. :)
Seriously, Q said that CIA invented the term "Q Anon" as a device to link Q to the actions of random anons. Then bad actors pretending to be patriot anons can be used to commit violence and mayhem so as to discredit Q in the eyes of the public. They are obsessed with this leader-follower theme where Q is the evil terrorist guru who is vilified insanely, so later his info about the baby-eating, child-trafficking cabal will be disbelieved.
No, just anon. Q is they, anon is we.
Retard.
Truth Anons