It says here that he worked on the second Crow film, not the first one with Brandon Lee. A search of the IMDB page doesn't show Dave Halls on the first film either so no connection to Brandon Lee.
Now I get it. The CIA directs and funds hollywood and that's how they orchestrated this whole scheme where they got the victim her job on set. Alec Baldwin was just the pansy this time. CIA used its agent to hand alec Baldwin the deadly pistol to take out the director. Now I get it. ... It's not Alec Baldwin's fault. He was tricked.
She was the camera operator, if he was pointing the gun at the camera then it would make sense that she would be hit. It would also make sense for the director to be hit if the bullet passed through her and hit him as the directors are often standing next to the camera operators watching how the scene is coming across on camera on an external monitor
No coincidence. The real perp knew alec Baldwin is an intense focused actor who can hit his mark for filming and would therefore shoot exactly where instructed (probably by the victim herself). Interesting to know if the script was delivered to the victim with directions for the actor to shoot directly into camera.
Baldwin still had the responsibility to check the weapon first.
Why was he using a real gun instead of a prop gun?
Why did he fire it without first checking what was in it?
He is responsible for firing the shots (x 2), and others are also responsible for putting real bullets into a real gun (x 2) that should have been a prop gun on a movie set.
I saw something where Jensen Ackles, who is also in the film talking about the poor training he got and it appears the picture they are trying to paint is that the people who are supposed to train the actors are negligent. There is also a story about how it was a local non-union crew because the rest walked off the set (the ranch is in Santa Fe but they would not let the crew stay in motels there,and were forcing them to drive to Albuquerque which is 63 miles from Santa Fe; long hours etc.
This is my tinfoil hat theory - they want to make it look like the locals are a bunch of deplorable boobs. But I wonder if the goal was to get the real crew away because they would know if something was wrong. Now you bring in a 'local' crew and...oops....
Edit to add: my tinfoil hat is on because it makes zero sense to have the crew stay in Albuquerque. It's not like they are saving money for the production. But it sure pissed them off...
Alex played the grandfather defending his grandson from a murder he didn't commit , the woman killed is Russian the wife of the attorney working for Clinton law firm defending sussman in Russia Russia Russia , a Russian tanker just exploded killing 17 yes 17 Russians
I know right , they killed Bruce Lee's kid , why they killed this attorneys wife ? I wonder if they made Baldwin do it or if he didn't know ,, he's in very deep so he probably had to ,, he's a real sick one , of course he won't be charge with anything ,,
I think being involved with a sequel to the crow and rust is just a coincidence. What I think is going on is Baldwin probably has a PR crisis management firm trying to deflect attention and blame onto the assistant director instead of himself, despite the fact he was the one one holding the gun and the one who fired it, as well as being one of the producers in charge of the whole movie in the first place.
A "prop gun" is not capable of firing real bullets. Therefore, it was a real gun. What was a real gun doing on a movie set?
A "cold gun" is supposed to have zero live rounds in it. If that was not the case, why would anyone grab it, hand it to the actor, and claim it was cold, but do so without checking to make sure?
Anyone who did the exact same thing on more than on occassion, and resulted in the harm of others, must be prosecuted, along with the actor who fired the bullet.
Who prepared the gun in the first place? It was a 3rd person, it seems. That person also needs to be prosecuted for putting a live round in a real gun that was supposed to be a prop gun.
Yeah, you're probably right. There's lots of info coming out and it's getting confusing. I will do better research. Ultimately I believe this is a distraction from Fauci lying about gain of function and the NIH admitting it.
We all make mistakes Sorry if I was too harsh. I get you were trying to share what you found. We just owe it to ourselves and each other to hold ourselves to a higher standard than the mainstream papparazzi, you know? =)
anyway, i'm sure the baldwin story is being used as a distraction, but it does have some relevance, and it does have some value in the 2A debate.
True! That's why I love this site. When our info is wrong or lacking, we have pedes who have dug into the research and can correct any mistakes or misinformation. Thanks bud
It says here that he worked on the second Crow film, not the first one with Brandon Lee. A search of the IMDB page doesn't show Dave Halls on the first film either so no connection to Brandon Lee.
Misquote perhaps on to which movie..or they started scenes for the next one before the first was done.....need more info on both productions...
Now I get it. The CIA directs and funds hollywood and that's how they orchestrated this whole scheme where they got the victim her job on set. Alec Baldwin was just the pansy this time. CIA used its agent to hand alec Baldwin the deadly pistol to take out the director. Now I get it. ... It's not Alec Baldwin's fault. He was tricked.
That leads to the most important questions of all:
What did Brandon Lee know?
Was the Nascar Brandon meme an MKULTRA plot designed to bring this full circle?
Even if all of this was orchestrated, what are the chances that Baldwin would shoot and kill the intended target by accident?
Yeah, I was really doubting the reality of this reality even before seeing that. Now I'm pretty sure none of this is real. Just a weird dream?
I agree with that possibility. This is a neutral question: Why would he point the gun at Halya?
She was the camera operator, if he was pointing the gun at the camera then it would make sense that she would be hit. It would also make sense for the director to be hit if the bullet passed through her and hit him as the directors are often standing next to the camera operators watching how the scene is coming across on camera on an external monitor
That's plausible. It would be great to know if they were filming or rehearsing a scene like that.
Somebody else mentioned that cameras downsight of a gun are unmanned by convention. I guess this wouldn't be the case in your suggestion
Give it half an hour for the cognitive dissonance to dissipate...
Prop guns don't shoot real bullets.
Things that shoot real bullets are called guns.
No coincidence. The real perp knew alec Baldwin is an intense focused actor who can hit his mark for filming and would therefore shoot exactly where instructed (probably by the victim herself). Interesting to know if the script was delivered to the victim with directions for the actor to shoot directly into camera.
Baldwin still had the responsibility to check the weapon first.
Why was he using a real gun instead of a prop gun?
Why did he fire it without first checking what was in it?
He is responsible for firing the shots (x 2), and others are also responsible for putting real bullets into a real gun (x 2) that should have been a prop gun on a movie set.
Is this a sag rule?
I saw something where Jensen Ackles, who is also in the film talking about the poor training he got and it appears the picture they are trying to paint is that the people who are supposed to train the actors are negligent. There is also a story about how it was a local non-union crew because the rest walked off the set (the ranch is in Santa Fe but they would not let the crew stay in motels there,and were forcing them to drive to Albuquerque which is 63 miles from Santa Fe; long hours etc.
This is my tinfoil hat theory - they want to make it look like the locals are a bunch of deplorable boobs. But I wonder if the goal was to get the real crew away because they would know if something was wrong. Now you bring in a 'local' crew and...oops....
Edit to add: my tinfoil hat is on because it makes zero sense to have the crew stay in Albuquerque. It's not like they are saving money for the production. But it sure pissed them off...
Alex played the grandfather defending his grandson from a murder he didn't commit , the woman killed is Russian the wife of the attorney working for Clinton law firm defending sussman in Russia Russia Russia , a Russian tanker just exploded killing 17 yes 17 Russians
Wtf is habbening
I know right , they killed Bruce Lee's kid , why they killed this attorneys wife ? I wonder if they made Baldwin do it or if he didn't know ,, he's in very deep so he probably had to ,, he's a real sick one , of course he won't be charge with anything ,,
There is no statute of limitations on murder.
I think being involved with a sequel to the crow and rust is just a coincidence. What I think is going on is Baldwin probably has a PR crisis management firm trying to deflect attention and blame onto the assistant director instead of himself, despite the fact he was the one one holding the gun and the one who fired it, as well as being one of the producers in charge of the whole movie in the first place.
Oopsie! They forgot to his record.
Regardless of any Q-posts, this is definetly 'The shot heard around the world.'
So, unrelated: https://qalerts.pub/?q=Shot+heard
Worked the first time.
Guess i have to be an actor before i can own a prop gun that shoots real bullets.
How are you a assistant director for 30? Years...
It's not a promotion thing, you choose to be an assistant director.
If they had of borrowed Mrs. McClosleys handgun for the scene, nobody would have been killed.
A "prop gun" is not capable of firing real bullets. Therefore, it was a real gun. What was a real gun doing on a movie set?
A "cold gun" is supposed to have zero live rounds in it. If that was not the case, why would anyone grab it, hand it to the actor, and claim it was cold, but do so without checking to make sure?
Anyone who did the exact same thing on more than on occassion, and resulted in the harm of others, must be prosecuted, along with the actor who fired the bullet.
Who prepared the gun in the first place? It was a 3rd person, it seems. That person also needs to be prosecuted for putting a live round in a real gun that was supposed to be a prop gun.
This is misleading as fuck, dude. If the same guy worked on the first crow, that might mean something.
Honestly bruce lee's curse is more credible than this...
Yeah, you're probably right. There's lots of info coming out and it's getting confusing. I will do better research. Ultimately I believe this is a distraction from Fauci lying about gain of function and the NIH admitting it.
We all make mistakes Sorry if I was too harsh. I get you were trying to share what you found. We just owe it to ourselves and each other to hold ourselves to a higher standard than the mainstream papparazzi, you know? =)
anyway, i'm sure the baldwin story is being used as a distraction, but it does have some relevance, and it does have some value in the 2A debate.
True! That's why I love this site. When our info is wrong or lacking, we have pedes who have dug into the research and can correct any mistakes or misinformation. Thanks bud
Anytime. And I'll hope you do the same for me if I'm wrong, lol.
Interesting. Didn’t the Lee’s supposedly have an odd curse against them?
Leading back to a spiritual war