I do agree with your well said statement. But to be honest about our Sleeping Normies: They could put on an old Q post that already took place and easily dismantle it. Because Normies wouldn’t understand to look at the date, and the coding done on the post until they had the “ah-hah moment”, if it comes.
No worries Galvatron. Always write things out and think on it/edit it before hitting send. Of course like I do at times, our site allows you to edit for big thinkers. So you are welcome to do that as well my friend.
I'm not sure the posts could be disproven. I think it's part of the plausible deniability that Q appeared to think was legally necessary as part of the project.
And we could always excuse a Q anti-proof as being irrelevant because future events can always validate a post in new ways.
Really the only Q anti-proof would be some sort of forensic evidence about who made the posts and their motivations.
Every time I ask people if they researched Q, they say, I looked into it, its bullshit. That is their response, almost word for word. Nothing else to add. Then I hear people like Tim Poole, Joe Rogan, Sam Tripolli, Owen Benjamin all do the same. Two of them are flat Earthers and yet Q is just bullshit. Keep an eye on Joe and Tim. They try to come off as fence sitters and you catch them injecting their leftist garbage in a matter of fact way.
I think people have written blogs attempting to do just that. I've seen a few in the past. I didn't read them though because I want to stay comfy in my bubble.
Q posts aren’t scripture. I’m sure many of them can be disproven, for instance “we went to the moon”. You will never read “disinfo is necessary” out of the mouth of God (scripture) or a prophet of God.
Its not just beans. We have canned peaches too
Moving to the country, gonna eat a lot of peaches!!
And ninja defense training videos in them bunkers, two.
Were they put there, by a man, in a factory doooooooowntooooown?
I do agree with your well said statement. But to be honest about our Sleeping Normies: They could put on an old Q post that already took place and easily dismantle it. Because Normies wouldn’t understand to look at the date, and the coding done on the post until they had the “ah-hah moment”, if it comes.
No worries Galvatron. Always write things out and think on it/edit it before hitting send. Of course like I do at times, our site allows you to edit for big thinkers. So you are welcome to do that as well my friend.
There are many Q posts that can be "disproven" because of disinformation. "You see, Hillary Clinton isn't under arrest."
they call it Qanon so search results only show their scripted narratives
And anyone can claim to be an anon. Discredit the anon, discredit Q. See how the linking works?
I'm not sure the posts could be disproven. I think it's part of the plausible deniability that Q appeared to think was legally necessary as part of the project.
And we could always excuse a Q anti-proof as being irrelevant because future events can always validate a post in new ways.
Really the only Q anti-proof would be some sort of forensic evidence about who made the posts and their motivations.
Every time I ask people if they researched Q, they say, I looked into it, its bullshit. That is their response, almost word for word. Nothing else to add. Then I hear people like Tim Poole, Joe Rogan, Sam Tripolli, Owen Benjamin all do the same. Two of them are flat Earthers and yet Q is just bullshit. Keep an eye on Joe and Tim. They try to come off as fence sitters and you catch them injecting their leftist garbage in a matter of fact way.
Notice not one "QANON" hit piece every links to any of the reflector sites so the reader can peruse for themselves.
I think people have written blogs attempting to do just that. I've seen a few in the past. I didn't read them though because I want to stay comfy in my bubble.
Q posts aren’t scripture. I’m sure many of them can be disproven, for instance “we went to the moon”. You will never read “disinfo is necessary” out of the mouth of God (scripture) or a prophet of God.