Allows them to fight back against fake news hit pieces. For example CNN joins the website, then they post an article slamming the website. They would be free to ban CNN from the website.
As already mentioned - it allows us to do what is already being done to us. Fuck em. Sometimes you do fight fire with fire.
Republicans need a platform that won’t be inundated with bullshit.
No one is taking them to jail for it.
So no rights are taken dude.
Trump wants a PROFESSIONAL free thought social media network.
That people can freely exchange IDEAS and SOLUTIONS.
Dropping a bunch of N bombs is not an idea or solution.
It's a childish insult and nothing more.
Ok.. let's say we are both on TruthSocial.
You find out I am black guy.
So you drop in a bunch of N bombs.
What excatly are you expecting to accomplish with that?
Are you thinking that's going to get me to leave?
Are you thinking that's going to make the world better?
It does nothing.
It's a childish insult and nothing more lol.
Taking away people's rights = Jailing them for something they said.
What the deep state wants to do with Speech.
Is tie it to a LEGAL social credit scoring system.
Where they can take away things based on what you are saying.
That's taking away rights.
Kicking an idiot who likes to call people stupid names off of TruthSocial.
No one is going to care about that.
That has nothing to do with truth.
That's an EMOTIONAL idiot looking to just name call.
People who name call.
Only do so because they think it gives them power over other people.
Everything is manufactured, BLM, antifa, fear porn, it’s all manufactured. Most black people could give her rats ass about it.
There’s no such thing as systemic racism, it’s just something to raise money during an election cycle wait till next year. BLM will be back at it just like antifa.
Any media without discrimination in its content becomes a melee.
Imagine a television news channel that covers EVERY point of view, no matter how stupid or malicious.
Imagine a social site that allows any troll or other bad actor to post malicious, dishonest, slanderous material.
Discrimination -- in friends, in food intake, in personal values, and in MOST things -- is critically important. It's discrimination against decent values and against TRUTH that is negative.
The value and character of censorship depends upon the values and character of the people doing the censoring.
Wait to see how they enforce it. They obviously need to have some restrictions on content posted by their users or it'll be used to post illegal content like CP. This very cite that you are currently posting on has similar protections in place.
We reserve the right to change, modify, or remove the contents of the Site at any time or for any reason at our sole discretion without notice. However, we have no obligation to update any information on our Site. We also reserve the right to modify or discontinue all or part of the Site without notice at any time.
Personally I'm not itching to see how extensively the hate-fueled liberals can disparage, tarnish and otherwise harm President Trump's site. This rule works just fine.
I have a question about "us". My understanding is that Trump won't join Gab because Andrew Torba allows "anti-semitism". So will TruthSocial ban folks determined to be "anti-semitic"?
Allows them to fight back against fake news hit pieces. For example CNN joins the website, then they post an article slamming the website. They would be free to ban CNN from the website.
As already mentioned - it allows us to do what is already being done to us. Fuck em. Sometimes you do fight fire with fire. Republicans need a platform that won’t be inundated with bullshit.
Well we own it soooooo….
I agree with this.
Look.. what the deep state is going to do. Is create a bunch of troll accounts.
Post racist shit. Take a photo of it. Send it to the press.
And boom!
It will be marked as a thrashy site.
They need a way to kick off trolls. Freedom of speech can be given.
But trolls will ruin the whole thing.
If someone is going on there talking trash, naming calling and other stuff. If everyone does that.
The app would suck!
They want hard and open talk that uses normal language. Swearing is ok in my view.
But childish name calling. That should be banned.
Not at all.
I can't speak for other black folks. I can just speak for myself.
I am a 42 year old black guy.
To me...
Name calling is IMMATURE!!! It's something I expect children to do.
I have cousins that live in a disfunctional home. All they do is call each other names.
I have seen disfunctional white familes. Also call each other names.
I have noticed that "Name Calling". Tends to come from low intelligence disfunctional people.
If you can't talk to someone with a name call. Then why talk to them at all.
No one is taking them to jail for it. So no rights are taken dude.
Trump wants a PROFESSIONAL free thought social media network. That people can freely exchange IDEAS and SOLUTIONS.
Dropping a bunch of N bombs is not an idea or solution. It's a childish insult and nothing more.
Ok.. let's say we are both on TruthSocial. You find out I am black guy.
So you drop in a bunch of N bombs.
What excatly are you expecting to accomplish with that? Are you thinking that's going to get me to leave? Are you thinking that's going to make the world better?
It does nothing. It's a childish insult and nothing more lol.
Taking away people's rights = Jailing them for something they said.
What the deep state wants to do with Speech. Is tie it to a LEGAL social credit scoring system. Where they can take away things based on what you are saying. That's taking away rights.
Kicking an idiot who likes to call people stupid names off of TruthSocial. No one is going to care about that.
That has nothing to do with truth. That's an EMOTIONAL idiot looking to just name call.
People who name call. Only do so because they think it gives them power over other people.
what rights specifically
It’s all a LARPs - LARP!
Everything is manufactured, BLM, antifa, fear porn, it’s all manufactured. Most black people could give her rats ass about it.
There’s no such thing as systemic racism, it’s just something to raise money during an election cycle wait till next year. BLM will be back at it just like antifa.
Any media without discrimination in its content becomes a melee.
Imagine a television news channel that covers EVERY point of view, no matter how stupid or malicious.
Imagine a social site that allows any troll or other bad actor to post malicious, dishonest, slanderous material.
Discrimination -- in friends, in food intake, in personal values, and in MOST things -- is critically important. It's discrimination against decent values and against TRUTH that is negative.
The value and character of censorship depends upon the values and character of the people doing the censoring.
Agreed - well put.
Don't confuse freedom of association with government enforced censorship.
Absolutely agreed
Wait to see how they enforce it. They obviously need to have some restrictions on content posted by their users or it'll be used to post illegal content like CP. This very cite that you are currently posting on has similar protections in place.
Huh, it doesn't want to allow GIFs, I wonder why.
Well crap, I have GIFs in muh Memes collections, wonder what would happen if I accidentally posted one?
But to answer your question.... we don't know, yet, do we. But the educated guess is no, not at all like the other (censored) sites.
https://truthsocial.com/terms-of-service
Did you read the part where it says:
I wouldn’t call it censorship, rather a simple fact. Investors are not going to be happy if the ir investment is being used to devalue itself.
Nope.
Personally I'm not itching to see how extensively the hate-fueled liberals can disparage, tarnish and otherwise harm President Trump's site. This rule works just fine.
Think the site is crap? Stay away. ;)
I have a question about "us". My understanding is that Trump won't join Gab because Andrew Torba allows "anti-semitism". So will TruthSocial ban folks determined to be "anti-semitic"?
Those are my thoughts. It is just going to be controlled opposition.