Karen Fann will not seek re-election. CodeMonkeyZ implies she is compromised.
(www.azcentral.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (167)
sorted by:
It's cringe the way CodeMonkeyZ tries to tap into Q's credibility by posting in a style similar to Q.
Because he certainly hasn't earned his own credibilty.
And he tries so hard to be anon, to be the poster child for anons, yet we all know his name.
You're getting downvoted by his fan club, but everything you said is true.
Which brings us to the growing problem of how some people lift these patriot 'influencers' up on a pedestal...
You mean by using a socratic method?
Do you like the socratic method?
If we know a person's name, are they anon?
Why did Q request that we remain anon?
Why would someone try to make a name for themselves in a community that values being anon?
Why would someone who is named attempt to represent anons on HBO?
Why is CMZ hyped every-other week on GA for some incredible thing to be announced "tomorrow morning" that never pans out?
What is project Odin, other than something that CMZ hyped as imminent for years?
If you know first hand how horrible voting is, and that all voting is America is pre-determined prior to ever a vote being cast, why would you run for congress (where victory relies upon said broken system of voting)?
What is a paytriot?
His style is certainly similar. Cryptic, terse, asks questions instead of directly giving evidence. I'm not saying he's a bad agent, just commenting on the style.
Exactamundo ☝🏼
Maybe it's just his style.
All I asked for was evidence of one thing he's accomplished for anons or the Q community.
Was that an impossible task?
He set up and ran the board Q posted on for the majority the drops upon Q's request. Likely more than your sad existence will amount to.
u/#q468
Perfectly timed post.
Imagine downvoting undisputable fact.
Well he helped convince people to wait two more weeks.
TWO WEEKS!
I'm a bit shocked that you don't KNOW what Ron did. Are you new?
Ron says he’s Q also.
I know he pretended to be an anon, even though everyone knows his name, to become the face of anons who follow Q on HBO.
I know he linked to another namefag paytriot NeonRevolt as his "most important post of his entire life" immediately prior to the election.
I know he has a "project Odin" that he likes to promote as though it is already a thing and imminent for years now that has vaguely something to do with the internet.
I know that every other week everyone posts about Ron date fagging about something super important "tomorrow morning" that never pans out.
How is it we're deep into this thread and there are still zero Ron supporters who can state what he has done that should be considered important to the Q community or anons.
Maybe you will eventually be the one to break that trend.
As far as him running for congress, does the name Dan Crenshaw mean anything to you?
you're sooooo close, almost there.
Q also quoted SB2 (serialbrain2) as he stated Alex Jones was bad.
Then SB2 capitalized on that fame by proceeding to post gematria gibberish interpretations of every tweet Trump ever made, stringing together the most ridiculous leaps of logic imaginable and all unprovable, by design.
Just because Q references someone does not bestow all of Q's credibility onto the person referenced.
Q, in their wisdom, decided that we should be anon. Anyone who sticks their head up in the Q community to make a name for themselves have already excluded themselves from being anon. It's so that individuals aren't identified as leaders of the Q movement, thus hijacking the movement into directions Q doesn't approve of.
If you believe that mate then you need to go back.....
WWG1WGA