It appears that this may have been a trap for PVeritas. O'Keefe has publicly stated that they were offered the diary through an intermediary that represented it had been legally obtained, and that PV, unable to verify the authenticity or legal origin after inspection, decided not to publish anything from the diary at all. Further, he stated that they tried to return the document to the source that supplied it [Edit: he days they tried to return it to an attorney who represented Ashley Biden, not the diary's provider], but that they were unable to do so, and so they turned it over to authorities. In the statement I read, he did not state which authority it was given to. Now a whistleblower is pointing the finger at PV as having leaked the document, which is now categorized as stolen.
We are watching a show. Take a high profile hated enemy of the MSM - Project Veritas - and make them the subject of a juicy story they can't resist plastering all over. Purpose? Get people to start looking at Ashley Biden, her diary, and the molestation and abuse she writes about.
Setting the stage for the next bit... even uglier.
This is part of O'Keefe's statement:
"Late last year, we were approached by tipsters claiming they had a copy of Ashley Biden’s diary. We had never met or heard of the tipsters. The tipsters indicated that the diary had been abandoned in a room in which Ms. Biden stayed at the time, and in which the tipsters stayed in temporarily after Ms. Biden departed the room. The tipsters indicated that the diary included explosive allegations against then-candidate, Joe Biden. The tipsters indicated that they were negotiating with a different media outlet for the payment of monies for the diary. The tipsters were represented by attorneys who handled the negotiations with Project Veritas.
"We investigated the claims provided to us, as journalists do. We took steps to corroborate the authenticity of the diary. At the end of the day, we made the ethical decision that because, in part, we could not determine if the diary was real, if the diary in fact belonged to Ashley Biden, or if the contents of the diary occurred, we could not publish the diary and any part thereof. We attempted to return the diary to an attorney representing Ms. Biden, but that attorney refused to authenticate it. Project Veritas gave the diary to law enforcement to ensure it could be returned to its rightful owner. We never published it.
"Now, Ms. Biden’s Father’s Department of Justice, specifically the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, appears to be investigating the situation, claiming the diary was stolen. We don’t know if it was, but it begs the question: in what world is the alleged theft of a diary investigated by the President’s FBI and his Department of Justice? A diary! This federal investigation smacks of politics. Project Veritas never threatened or engaged in any illegal conduct. "
In O'Keefe's video did anyone else notice the camera angle seemed to shift to a 3/4 view many of the times he mentioned SDNY? I did, and it struck me as odd - though I viewed it After Midnight, so who knows. 🙄
I got the text in an email, as I'm subscribed to his email list. But I also saw the video, and it looked to have been spliced. It made me do a double-take because it was weird to watch, but I assumed he did multiple takes to avoid messing up his scripted lines. I didn't think much of it, but if 3/4 views are some secret comm thing, or if it's 17 seconds between each cut or a Morse code thing, maybe it's important.
I rewatched it After Midnight, and I deduced it was just editing to help with flubbing his lines, smooth presentation, etc. So I was kind of trolling when I already knew the answer here.
Glad it stuck out to you as well though. It was kind of a strangely edited video. Lighting was weird too.
Someone wanted this public and wanted attention drawn to it. Who? Why?
They knew PV would talk about it, especially after the fishy letter they got and someone spilling crap about it. It's an intentional thing to draw attention. Why?
Something to help remove Biden from office, that's now needed and wasn't the past year?
Draw attention off of other things happening? (Probably not, since it draws more attention to PV.)
Who?
WH
BH with beef with Biden/keep him in line?
Grey enemies of Biden/s?
I missed tons of details, I'm sure. Just some random thoughts tho.
It appears that this may have been a trap for PVeritas. O'Keefe has publicly stated that they were offered the diary through an intermediary that represented it had been legally obtained, and that PV, unable to verify the authenticity or legal origin after inspection, decided not to publish anything from the diary at all. Further, he stated that they tried to return the document to the source that supplied it [Edit: he days they tried to return it to an attorney who represented Ashley Biden, not the diary's provider], but that they were unable to do so, and so they turned it over to authorities. In the statement I read, he did not state which authority it was given to. Now a whistleblower is pointing the finger at PV as having leaked the document, which is now categorized as stolen.
What it is, is some 5D Chess by Q and Q+.
We are watching a show. Take a high profile hated enemy of the MSM - Project Veritas - and make them the subject of a juicy story they can't resist plastering all over. Purpose? Get people to start looking at Ashley Biden, her diary, and the molestation and abuse she writes about.
Setting the stage for the next bit... even uglier.
Yeah, could be. Either way, it's big stakes, bonus round, double-point-jeopardy time.
I’ve been waiting for large moves by the FBI under Biden on Veritas.
This is so “Kiss The Ring” I hope it sheds more light on hunters laptop
Just to add to that James met with POTUS in the White House. We have to wonder what might have been discussed…….
Everyone with a voice is part of the show. They could shut anyone down they wanted and we wouldnt even know it.
This is part of O'Keefe's statement: "Late last year, we were approached by tipsters claiming they had a copy of Ashley Biden’s diary. We had never met or heard of the tipsters. The tipsters indicated that the diary had been abandoned in a room in which Ms. Biden stayed at the time, and in which the tipsters stayed in temporarily after Ms. Biden departed the room. The tipsters indicated that the diary included explosive allegations against then-candidate, Joe Biden. The tipsters indicated that they were negotiating with a different media outlet for the payment of monies for the diary. The tipsters were represented by attorneys who handled the negotiations with Project Veritas.
"We investigated the claims provided to us, as journalists do. We took steps to corroborate the authenticity of the diary. At the end of the day, we made the ethical decision that because, in part, we could not determine if the diary was real, if the diary in fact belonged to Ashley Biden, or if the contents of the diary occurred, we could not publish the diary and any part thereof. We attempted to return the diary to an attorney representing Ms. Biden, but that attorney refused to authenticate it. Project Veritas gave the diary to law enforcement to ensure it could be returned to its rightful owner. We never published it.
"Now, Ms. Biden’s Father’s Department of Justice, specifically the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, appears to be investigating the situation, claiming the diary was stolen. We don’t know if it was, but it begs the question: in what world is the alleged theft of a diary investigated by the President’s FBI and his Department of Justice? A diary! This federal investigation smacks of politics. Project Veritas never threatened or engaged in any illegal conduct. "
Hijacking to speculate:
In O'Keefe's video did anyone else notice the camera angle seemed to shift to a 3/4 view many of the times he mentioned SDNY? I did, and it struck me as odd - though I viewed it After Midnight, so who knows. 🙄
I got the text in an email, as I'm subscribed to his email list. But I also saw the video, and it looked to have been spliced. It made me do a double-take because it was weird to watch, but I assumed he did multiple takes to avoid messing up his scripted lines. I didn't think much of it, but if 3/4 views are some secret comm thing, or if it's 17 seconds between each cut or a Morse code thing, maybe it's important.
😁
I rewatched it After Midnight, and I deduced it was just editing to help with flubbing his lines, smooth presentation, etc. So I was kind of trolling when I already knew the answer here.
Glad it stuck out to you as well though. It was kind of a strangely edited video. Lighting was weird too.
Could be given how smelly it is like FBI.
Someone wanted this public and wanted attention drawn to it. Who? Why?
They knew PV would talk about it, especially after the fishy letter they got and someone spilling crap about it. It's an intentional thing to draw attention. Why?
Who?
I missed tons of details, I'm sure. Just some random thoughts tho.
Exactly. But even if PV kept quiet, FBI raids make noise when leaked to the NYT.
On Nov 4, 2018 Q posted "Guardians of the Pedophiles." On Nov 4 2021 FBI raided PV Journalist's home.
So my guess it's part of the show.