Wtf is going on here
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (47)
sorted by:
I don't think Flynn is referring to Baptists vs Methodists vs Catholic. I think he probably means Christianity in general... no room for Muslims or Satanists... and I could get behind that.
In fact freedom of religion originally meant denominations of Christianity as one group often fought another and persecuted eachother the founding fathers never would have thought that muslims or other religions would eventually come over and dog themselves in.
This is true. Of both the mayflower pilgrims reasons for coming and the French hugonauts. They didn’t want the State determining theology or practice of worship.
Exactly; we see proof of this in the Salem witch trials (not that Ive done extensive research or believe the history books to be factual). My point is, if this were the case, why couldn’t witches claim their religious freedom? (Icky)
salem witch trial happened before the United States was a thing is why.
Flynn is right. Study the original State Constitutions, Compacts, and Colony Charters to know the truth.
Ezra Cohen represents those who demanded Jesus be crucified instead of condemned murderer Barabbas.
How about dual citizen J’s?
I'm not going to split hairs on this.
Dual citizenship is messed up, and illegal. Independent of religious arguments.
The GA is not about "Religion". This is not a religious war. This is a war to expose lies, to expose The Matrix, to expose the control structures that influence our beliefs.
Every religious person is 100% certain they know the Truth; 100% certain, no doubts whatsoever. It doesn't matter how different their belief systems are from those others that are 100% certain, they are all certain, beyond doubt or the ability to listen to other ideas.
If evidence conflicts with a persons beliefs, if they are 100% certain they already know the Truth, they are incapable of looking at that evidence with any intent other than to "debunk" it. There can be no honest investigation if a person already "knows" the Truth.
The GA is about removing all the scales that cover our eyes so that we can see all the evidence. Evidence suggests there are veils of falsehood in all the world's religions. To think that these institutions that have been around for thousands of years; that have been responsible for uncountable death and destruction all while controlling huge portions of the worlds populations, behaviors and beliefs have somehow escaped Luciferian influence is... well... Lets call it naïve (at best).
annnnd get the fucking Muslims the fuck out of America
Don’t forget to get (((them))) out of here too.
Every time the Bible was rewritten expect it to have been changed not for the good. The older the scriptures the closer to the truth. King James version is most certainly bastardized by man. I don't agree with organized religion one bit. The only thing required to have a relationship with the creator is yourself and the knowledge of his existence.
I disagree, this was true when there was only a few people who knew and had access to the Bible. Nowadays, the biggest issue you run into is laziness, a lot of people take versions of the Bible and try to update them to today's language, but they solely base it off of another Bible. The correct action to take is to translate it from the original text to current language. The next difficulty is in translation itself, you must decide if you will translate words or phrases, the wording comes out slightly different each way. I have discussed this topic at length with a friend of mine who was part of a translating team.
A common debate strategy is to attempt to discredit someone else's argument by beginning with an ad hominem attack. Such attacks are not an attempt to get closer to the Truth with debate, but to shut down the person presenting the argument, often while avoiding addressing their argument itself.
I agree with this. I never said religion wasn't a part of the issue, in fact within my statements are that Religions are a part of the fraud of lies. Within the context of my statements I am saying that this is not a religious war, as in, this isn't a holy war (Christians v. Muslims which is what I was responding to). There is fraud (lies) in the Religion Christianity, there is fraud in the Religion Islam, there is fraud in the Religion Satanism, there is fraud in the Religion Hindi, etc., etc. You pretty much said the same thing, so I will assume you agree with me on this point.
You will notice that no where in there was a statement of Truth being a fraud, but Religion being a fraud. I also stated that the GA is about the TRUTH being revealed, aka
Context matters.
The media takes a statement and leaves out necessary context to misrepresent what someone is saying. They discredit someone to make their statements seem as if coming from a bad source. They twist reality for their own agenda.
Don't be the media.
The First Amendment does not agree.
If taken in a broad definition, maybe not. But the Founders were of various denominations of Christianity or Deism, so an argument could be sustained that the First Amendment was meant to address the religions of that time -- Quakers, Baptists, Catholics, -- which were largely Christian doctrines. This has been an ongoing controversy since the founding.
All the First Amendment says about religion is that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.."
I'm not convinced that the Founders could have foreseen a time when a foreign religion could take hold in this country, a religion that expressly goes against the tenets of our Constitution in terms of individual liberties, free speech, free association, and a free press as laid out in the First Amendment.
The Constitution is not an elaborate suicide note, and we Americans should not allow any religion in this country that is so hostile to the Constitution itself.
You don't get to pick and choose which parts you like and agree with and those you don't. This is the same argument anti-gun faggots make with regards to the Second. It was either written as it was for all eternity or it's completely outdated. It is not one or the other nor do some Amendments have more relevance than others.
I completely reject your argument and talking point. We are NOT a Christian nation we are a FREE nation of many faiths. If we were meant to be a Christian Nation, the Law would be the New Testament. There's a reason it is not.
I agree with you IN PRINCIPLE. But I'll state it again, the Constitution is not a suicide pact. People who use our Constitution to ATTACK our Constitution should be dealt with harshly. And Islam is directly opposed to the very basic tenets of our Constitution.