To me, this promotes division which I'm against no matter which side it comes from. The last thing we need is to make the people who took the stab ,for whatever reason, think we're coming across as superior to them. Particularly when trying to convince them not to take stab 3,4,5 and so on.
Comments (50)
sorted by:
They already call us nazis and white supremecists. Embrace it and piss them off. Break their tiny brains. We are ALREADY divided and kowtowing to their BS only emboldens them. STOP WORRYING ABOUT THE FEELINGS OF THE MENTALLY DERANGED. That's how we got here to begin with.
The term was originally coined by J.K. Rowling to mean those who had a lineage of wizardry on both sides of their family. the obverse is 'mudblood', for people who only had one wizard parent. I believe that it was based on the Nazi heritage research for SS membership. Not that the purebloods were arrogant and looked like Nazis in the movies. However, I embrace the term.
I think quite a few people aren't really getting the point of the pureblood meme.
The idea behind it was to take the Deathly Hallows symbol -- a design that many leftists have tattooed on them -- and turn it into a "hate symbol for the unvaccinated," ala the OK sign. The fact that Rowling is a TERF feeds beautifully into the whole thing, and hopefully the meme will force tens of thousands of butthurt lefties to remove their tattoos.
To use it anonymously online, you can go full smug Malfoy on your opponents. In real life, though, you wouldn't mention it until someone else brought it up, then just chuckle and play it off: "oh yeah, I guess I am pureblooded haha" or "pureblooded? What does that mean?" and so forth.
So no one should be getting genuinely divided by this that hasn't been already.
"They?" THEY? Who are "they?"
They aren't any of the jabbed I know, that's for sure.
On the web, we hear the screeching of the ultra-woke minority 10% (or whatever) but in real life -- in MY real life, anyway -- everyone I know who took the jab did it because they believed the Authorities speaking on television and everywhere saying that they needed to and that it was good and safe, or because they needed their job or business to continue or because they desperately wanted to sit beside a loved one in the hospital who was dying and the non-vaxxed weren't allowed in, or for some other reason.
NONE of these people have ever shown any inclination to slander others as "nazis and white supremecists." To a man and woman, they're all decent and kind-hearted souls who have been victimized by the psychopaths who put this nightmare into motion and have kept it going. As you might expect, I don't live in a big blue city, but even IN those cauldrons, not everyone is as you describe.
Yes, plenty of the vaxxed are lefty idiots and millions are toxic, malicious individuals. But millions aren't -- and for that matter, more and more of them are innocent children. Also, many of those not completely broken-minded are coming to our side; learning what's been done to them is both helping with this and (because of psychological defenses) slowing it down.
"Love one another, as I have loved you" -- the "new commandment" Jesus gave us in John 13:34 -- is something worth remembering in our situation. It fits right in with Q's comments about the need for unity.
Who gives a shit what they are equating with anything? They want you dead or enslaved. Wake up, you are buying into their narrative. Their bullshit is working on you. Why would you care if they call you a white supremacist? You do know they already call you one. Like the rino politicians thinking, Don’t upset them and then they won’t call us bad names. Be nice to them even though they are doing everything They can to destroy your country and you and your family’s way of life This thinking is why we are in this situation
It depends whether you are afraid to fight back as ruthlessly as them or be afraid to do to them what they do to you because you are afraid of them.
Just as we were demonized and called 'deplorables', we took that name and wore it with a badge of honor. I'm taking 'pure blood' to mean the same.The Red Cross won't take mRNA genetically modified blood. They want our 'pure blood'. This is for any all races that are unvaxxed. The Hmong community are adamantly opposed to this mRNA geneticly modified injections. They are 'pure bloods' too.
Exactly.
Your assessment is in error. One cannot divide something that's already divided. It is the vaxxers, not the pure bloods that are causing division. Just like we were called 'deplorables', a term that was used by the left to divide us, we took that name and wore it with a badge of honor. It is the Red Cross that won't take mRNA genetically modified blood, not the pure bloods. Jesus said our blood is sacred. We are being shown this is precisely the case. My blood is sacred and pure. I am a pure blood by the sanctity of my Will before my Lord and Savior.
The term doesn't mean this. And you know it. This is about a mRNA gene modifying experiment.
You say there is no such thing as a pure blood and then go on to describe that people who haven't received any shot, of which there are many, are pure bloods. Okay...
It must be hard to be you.ohh well anyhow reddit's over there.
And if you define pure blood as those who have not injected experimental mRNA toxins, then yes we have plenty of pure bloods.
Our definition of pure blood is different from yours.
Haha, so if I define "pure blood" as a tongue-in-cheek term to identify people who have not taken the gene therapy toxin, and you think its dumb as dogshit, then sorry fren, but its actually your thinking process that is that!
What in the heck does this have anything to do with gene therapy? Fren, is the stress getting to you? Need to take a break? I can arrange for that.
A person who has nothing of value to add to a discussion resorts to name calling. So thanks for showing me that you got nothing intellectual to add to this discussion.
It is not surprising considering you cannot differentiate the level of evil between different vaccines and this gene therapy.
Non-GMO pureblood 100%
It reminds me of that vampire show true blood.
Too much empathy is what got us in this situation to begin with. Wear it loud and proud. We are the unmodified. We are the purebloods.
No it was apathy that got us here. People were not paying attention to what they were doing in Washington, and at the local levels. This election was stolen from us with only a few key counties, and some county and state elections.
Good comment, QitUp. "Purebloods" is an evocative and accurate term (relative to those who have been jabbed) and I don't have any problem with it in some contexts but Unity is more important in most situations than flaunting our un-victimized status.
Excerpted from Q post 4545 June 29 2020
What are we talking about? Purebloods vs Mudbloods? lol
Interesting discussion, this. My take?
Remember the whip? Remember the whip being discarded and trampled?
Remember how many were freed yet volunteered?
I like to think Khaleesi would have referenced us as "unsullied".
Just use the term in dating apps. But that goes without saying.
Well, I don't know.... but suspect.... purebloods will become prey for the blood-feeders. Am I kidding? Not at all sure. But maybe the vaxxed will, as a way to become transhuman without the jab. Time for more not so sci-fi movies.
Well we are intellectually superior... 🤷 proof is in tha puddin.
“think we're coming across as superior to them. Particularly when trying to convince them not to take stab 3,4,5 and so on.”
This statement by OP doesn’t make sense. A jab is a binary choice, you either do it or you don’t. One of the two options will be superior, the other inferior. If we’re trying to convince other people to make the superior choice like we did, we’ll come across as superior. It’s not worth being uptight about.
OP is overly worried about being divided from people who already chose division for themselves. The division serves a purpose of helping track the vaxxed so that their adverse effects can rightly be blamed on the vaxx, and not on climate change, racism, or Kyle Rittenhouse.
Yes. The OP is having a hard time saying “be easy on these retards, when they finally figure out they made a retarded choice”. Which I am all for, but it doesn’t mean we have to feel bad or stop pointing out that we were right. pointing out we were right might open their minds even more and get them to actually listen to opposing positions or have them using their brains for critical thinking in the future. I boil it all down to SPEAK THE TRUTH UNAPOLOGETICALLY and let the chips lie whey their lie.
Not disagreeing with what you’re saying. But, would they be easy on us if it was the other way around? I think most people here know the answer
Depends on the person I suppose. I’m kinda a dish it out as much as they gave it person. Some will be handled with kid gloves, others will get the wrath.
How about ALPHA BLOOD.
Don’t like it. Comes across as arrogant and holier then thou - so it totally misses the point