recommended reading: "Who is Edom-Esau": https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZSW5FE1R0KpwnVTByf2csbnuPst19oMD/view

Esau was the first born of Isaac, and thus was heir to the birthright derived from the direct racial lineage of Adam to Noah to Abraham. Just as "Esau despised his birthright" (Gen. 25:34) when he sold it to Jacob, he also despised his race by marrying strange women outside of his race. Esau married the daughters of Canaan or Canaanites (Gen. 28:6; 36:2), the daughters of Heth or Hittites (Gen. 26:34; 27:46; 36:2), the daughters of Ishmael (Gen. 28:9; 36:3), the daughters of the Hivites (Gen. 36:2), and had intermarried with the Horites (Gen. 36:19-21). These interracial marriages "were a grief of mind to Isaac and Rebekah," Esau's parents (Gen. 26:35). The descendants of Esau from these marriages became known as "Edomites" or as "Edom" (Gen. 36:1, 9).

"The Edomites were driven from Petra westward by the Nabatheans in 312 B.C., and before the middle of the second century B.C. they were occupying, not only southern Judah, but also Hebron and the country to its north as far as Bethzur (1 Mac. 4:29; 5:65)

Julius Caesar made Antipater, an Edomite, Procurator of Judea in 47 B.C. When Antipater was killed four years later his son Herod gained power but was rejected by the Judahites. Herod shrewdly gained the support of Rome. With a Roman army at his heels be returned to Palestine, and after a six-month siege he captured Jerusalem, and became king of Judea in 37 B.C.

TL;DR Jews are descendants of Esau, the Edom, not to be confused with the Judahites who are Israelites. John Hyrcanus forcibly converted the Edomites to Talmudism/Judaism. They are the "children of the serpent" and "synagogue of Satan" Jesus spoke of.

And before someone asserts Jesus was an edomite: https://christogenea.org/podcasts/exactly-why-jesus-christ-not-jew

Balfour Declaration of 1917

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balfour_Declaration

start at Hitler being a Rothschild sock puppet

I just watched Europa The Last Battle Part 2 yesterday and it addresses that very question.

edit: at least it touches on the creation of Israel (not so much on its ties to the derp state)

Don’t know much about the connections to deep state upon its founding but It would seem the establishment (mainly British) was quite resistant to this movement when it began. Anyway, a little bit ago I read a book called “the man eaters of tsavo.” Which the movie ghost in the darkness is somewhat based upon. Col patterson was a Christian Irishman Who sympathized with some of his peers who were Jewish refugees. He ended up playing a key role in the training of the Zion mule brigade, which was made up of Jewish refugees who wanted to take back their homeland from the Ottoman Empire. Much like the Irish who came to fight in our civil war in order to gain military experience and return to Ireland and regain their country from the British, the Zion mule brigade fought with the British to gain experience to fight off the Turkish empire. The men involved seemed genuine and don’t seem too deep state to me but you never know.

https://zionism-israel.com/dic/Zion_mule_corps.htm

All countries, they are constantly showing us with their handshakes and other symbols. The Anti-Masonic Party was the first third-party in the US and I believe they did quite well while it existed. The story of how it was formed is also interesting (basically the disapperance of a Mason whistleblower). A modern version would be extremely popular.

John F. Kennedy Speec, April 27, 1961 (06:26) I refer first to the need for far greater public information, and second, to the need for far greater official secrecy. The very word secrecy is repugnant in a free and open society, and we are as a people, inherently and historically, opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweigh the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today there is little value in ensuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it’s in my control, and no official of my administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes, or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.