I asked this on another post…
Can someone explain this to me like I am Slo-Joe:
So Pfizer had evidence after 3 months from the start of the rollout / trial during Dec 20-Feb 21 that there were ~1200 deaths and thousands of AEs among the 42000 guinea pigs in this time period. Then they went on to conclude in this report that all is fine and proceed as planned. And the reason they could do this (apart form being an evil Bond movie mega corp whose power transcends law, government and ethics) is, as far as I can tell, is because they are essentially claiming those deaths and injuries were going to happen to those people anyway, during that time period of their lives, so correlation is not causation, plausible deniability, blah blah blah? Am I reading this correctly? The defence is “those victim-patients would have died / had heart attack / cardiological and neurological injuries / etc at that time anyway, regardless of the injectable products?”
I think one mistake you are making, I know because I was making it too, is that the 42,000 is not the total number jabbed. That is the number of Adverse Events (AE’s), which this document breaks down further.
I cannot find the total sample size, which is really important to properly understanding the real impact.
If anyone has a different take on the data, share it.
Good catch. I have not had time yet to thoroughly read the report, but what I have gleaned from it did not impress me. I want to know where are the regular safety reports that should be reported to the FDA as a part of trial monitoring - unless of course, the FDA is receiving those safety reports and not making those reports available for public review. As far as I know, not one report has been submitted on any of the jabs. Therefore, the VAERS is the only early warning system we have even if it is not perfect.
The problem that I see here are the differences in opinion over defining what is an acceptable level of injury and death. Numbers that are appalling to us and seemingly unacceptable because we understand there are real human beings that are being harmed, seems to be of no consequence to those psychopaths conducting these studies and those in a position to make public policy decisions regarding these clot shots. Many drugs have been pulled and many trials ended because of far fewer reports of injury and death. It appears that all the normal checks and balances have been ignored or bypassed altogether. The level of corruption and deliberate disregard for life demonstrated by so many involved with this experiment is chilling. It has been demonstrated from some of the trial data we have been able to review, that the data has been manipulated - and some of that manipulation was not very sophisticated. Having previously worked in research myself, I know how many of these studies are designed. The fact that the numbers of AEs are as high as they are despite the manipulation is concerning for me because the actual numbers are much higher.
I am grateful for this forum where we can report relevant information and share our thoughts concerning what is reported. It is comforting to be among like minded people.
I think 42086 is the number of case reports (people) as shown in Table 1 and then 93473 is the number of AEs as at the bottom of Table 2. Each person can have more than one AE.
I know that we all have a deeply ingrained need to ask and know "why"; but in the end, it doesn't matter.
I guarantee you these demons had an entire book (at least!) full of jargon-filled reasons explaining away all of these events and even more / worse / totally different outcomes.
All that matters, all that you have to fundamentally grasp is;
The beings doing this are literally satanic demons from hell, either dressed up as humans, or possessing human bodies. Doesn't matter.
They literally come from satan's side.
They are pure, unfettered evil.
Once you fully grasp this, everything being done in our world makes perfect sense.
Suggest instead of thinking about "why evil loves to be evil"; learn more about ballistics, trajectories, etc.
Because evil ain't going to go away on its own.
Again; NOT trying to be rude, dismissive, etc. nothing of the sort.
I totally understand what you are saying, and no offence is taken. I agree on the evil but in my worldview, I see it coming from a place of derangement and pathological, diseased psychology - malignant narcissism, criminal psychopathy, psychotic delusions. When rolled up to a power structure level such as government or industry, it becomes democidal pathocracy ie a psychopathic power structure that is demonstrably killing its population. The outcomes are the same - evil being perpetrated on the unsuspecting. Much of my understanding has been arrived at by reading books like The Luciferian Principle and also Political Ponerology. I do not discount the religious dimension at all, it’s just an area I know so little about as a non-practising agnostic.
I know that we all have a deeply ingrained need to ask and know "why"; but in the end, it doesn't matter.>
This is so TRUE! We all want to believe in pure and good motives in people just as we may have. But the real truth is these evil demons are not like us in any way ... and they are in the positions of power in much of our society to do as much harm as possible.
Are you a child of God or one of them? As far as I know, you may still have a choice.
I agree with most all of your conclusions. Regarding the data, my understanding is the 42K are voluntarily submitted case reports. They are likely a subset of VAERS and subject to the same limitations of interpretation.
lol and after all the adverse data their conclusion is "Review of the available data for this cumulative PM experience, confirms a favorable
benefit: risk balance for BNT162b2."
This is all the companies and governments parrot, but it's just a subjective comment. There's never any data or calculation attached. Just take our word for it, people.
yeah exactly. It's like here is all this evidence that prove how it is harmful, BUT we still say the benefits outweigh the risks so jab up or else. And then it echos down to doctors and other clinical people. And people just believe it. It's infuriating to me.
There was this post yesterday that shows it was actually 82% for women less than 20 weeks into their pregnancy had a miscarriage. It seems like in this study they intentionally messed with the numbers to try to keep it lower
Right, and in that study, I read that no outcome was reported for 238 of the 270 total test subjects. Only 32 responded.
That means, of the 32 pregnant women who responded, 26 of them reported that their babies died, 5 reported 'outcome pending' which I guess means they were still pregnant at that time, and only one reported a normal birth. That's 81 percent by my math.
Given the large number of people who didn't respond, it is very likely that the remaining women had similar results, which may explain why they intentionally reported it this way. 26 deaths out of 270 doesn't sound nearly as bad as 26 out of 32.
What comments? I don't know how many people are vaccinated but I'm willing to bet the numbers are overly inflated. I have a friend who is friends with a midwife that has shown pictures of torn placentas being covered in blood clots which started after the vaccinations. In addition to that, an acquaintance who was vaccinated found out their child has a deformity from the sonogram. They have already made arrangements with CHOP for surgery once the baby is born.
Crimes against humanity, folks!
Old news for us, news for the already vax_xd
If only one of those assertions were true
Knowingly
They knowingly knew! Let's talk about investing
I asked this on another post… Can someone explain this to me like I am Slo-Joe:
So Pfizer had evidence after 3 months from the start of the rollout / trial during Dec 20-Feb 21 that there were ~1200 deaths and thousands of AEs among the 42000 guinea pigs in this time period. Then they went on to conclude in this report that all is fine and proceed as planned. And the reason they could do this (apart form being an evil Bond movie mega corp whose power transcends law, government and ethics) is, as far as I can tell, is because they are essentially claiming those deaths and injuries were going to happen to those people anyway, during that time period of their lives, so correlation is not causation, plausible deniability, blah blah blah? Am I reading this correctly? The defence is “those victim-patients would have died / had heart attack / cardiological and neurological injuries / etc at that time anyway, regardless of the injectable products?”
“Science” is mostly cherry picking for confirmation bias
And Fauci, you forgot him. Science = Fauci.
I think one mistake you are making, I know because I was making it too, is that the 42,000 is not the total number jabbed. That is the number of Adverse Events (AE’s), which this document breaks down further.
I cannot find the total sample size, which is really important to properly understanding the real impact.
If anyone has a different take on the data, share it.
Origin doc: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf
Good catch. I have not had time yet to thoroughly read the report, but what I have gleaned from it did not impress me. I want to know where are the regular safety reports that should be reported to the FDA as a part of trial monitoring - unless of course, the FDA is receiving those safety reports and not making those reports available for public review. As far as I know, not one report has been submitted on any of the jabs. Therefore, the VAERS is the only early warning system we have even if it is not perfect.
The problem that I see here are the differences in opinion over defining what is an acceptable level of injury and death. Numbers that are appalling to us and seemingly unacceptable because we understand there are real human beings that are being harmed, seems to be of no consequence to those psychopaths conducting these studies and those in a position to make public policy decisions regarding these clot shots. Many drugs have been pulled and many trials ended because of far fewer reports of injury and death. It appears that all the normal checks and balances have been ignored or bypassed altogether. The level of corruption and deliberate disregard for life demonstrated by so many involved with this experiment is chilling. It has been demonstrated from some of the trial data we have been able to review, that the data has been manipulated - and some of that manipulation was not very sophisticated. Having previously worked in research myself, I know how many of these studies are designed. The fact that the numbers of AEs are as high as they are despite the manipulation is concerning for me because the actual numbers are much higher.
I am grateful for this forum where we can report relevant information and share our thoughts concerning what is reported. It is comforting to be among like minded people.
I think 42086 is the number of case reports (people) as shown in Table 1 and then 93473 is the number of AEs as at the bottom of Table 2. Each person can have more than one AE.
Not being snarky, sarcastic, rude; just blunt;
Why do pigs love the mud?
Does it matter why pigs love the mud?
I know that we all have a deeply ingrained need to ask and know "why"; but in the end, it doesn't matter.
I guarantee you these demons had an entire book (at least!) full of jargon-filled reasons explaining away all of these events and even more / worse / totally different outcomes.
All that matters, all that you have to fundamentally grasp is; The beings doing this are literally satanic demons from hell, either dressed up as humans, or possessing human bodies. Doesn't matter.
They literally come from satan's side.
They are pure, unfettered evil.
Once you fully grasp this, everything being done in our world makes perfect sense.
Suggest instead of thinking about "why evil loves to be evil"; learn more about ballistics, trajectories, etc.
Because evil ain't going to go away on its own.
Again; NOT trying to be rude, dismissive, etc. nothing of the sort.
I totally understand what you are saying, and no offence is taken. I agree on the evil but in my worldview, I see it coming from a place of derangement and pathological, diseased psychology - malignant narcissism, criminal psychopathy, psychotic delusions. When rolled up to a power structure level such as government or industry, it becomes democidal pathocracy ie a psychopathic power structure that is demonstrably killing its population. The outcomes are the same - evil being perpetrated on the unsuspecting. Much of my understanding has been arrived at by reading books like The Luciferian Principle and also Political Ponerology. I do not discount the religious dimension at all, it’s just an area I know so little about as a non-practising agnostic.
This is so TRUE! We all want to believe in pure and good motives in people just as we may have. But the real truth is these evil demons are not like us in any way ... and they are in the positions of power in much of our society to do as much harm as possible.
Are you a child of God or one of them? As far as I know, you may still have a choice.
Thank You! And I agree with what you say.....
I agree with most all of your conclusions. Regarding the data, my understanding is the 42K are voluntarily submitted case reports. They are likely a subset of VAERS and subject to the same limitations of interpretation.
I think you summed that up fairly well. There are none so blind as those who refuse to see.
lol and after all the adverse data their conclusion is "Review of the available data for this cumulative PM experience, confirms a favorable benefit: risk balance for BNT162b2."
This is all the companies and governments parrot, but it's just a subjective comment. There's never any data or calculation attached. Just take our word for it, people.
yeah exactly. It's like here is all this evidence that prove how it is harmful, BUT we still say the benefits outweigh the risks so jab up or else. And then it echos down to doctors and other clinical people. And people just believe it. It's infuriating to me.
The question is: What comes next and by whom?
3% K/D ratio...
what is a spontaneous abortion?
Scripted Evil
There was this post yesterday that shows it was actually 82% for women less than 20 weeks into their pregnancy had a miscarriage. It seems like in this study they intentionally messed with the numbers to try to keep it lower
https://greatawakening.win/p/140c4nuqnt/x/c/4JIPfdkq9GG
For women over 20 weeks, you'd get a premature birth, not a miscarriage.
Right, and in that study, I read that no outcome was reported for 238 of the 270 total test subjects. Only 32 responded.
That means, of the 32 pregnant women who responded, 26 of them reported that their babies died, 5 reported 'outcome pending' which I guess means they were still pregnant at that time, and only one reported a normal birth. That's 81 percent by my math.
Given the large number of people who didn't respond, it is very likely that the remaining women had similar results, which may explain why they intentionally reported it this way. 26 deaths out of 270 doesn't sound nearly as bad as 26 out of 32.
What comments? I don't know how many people are vaccinated but I'm willing to bet the numbers are overly inflated. I have a friend who is friends with a midwife that has shown pictures of torn placentas being covered in blood clots which started after the vaccinations. In addition to that, an acquaintance who was vaccinated found out their child has a deformity from the sonogram. They have already made arrangements with CHOP for surgery once the baby is born.