Study this post....
What was the 16 yr plan?...
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (36)
sorted by:
The 16 year plan is still relevant. That is why the are expediting at "warp speed". They had to keep the timeline. Something more is afoot. Why didn't they start with old man Bush, or Clinton, why was the 16 yr plan with BHO and HRC? What conjunctions happen in 2024?
Yep.
So, in fact, their timeline was smashed, and they have had to create a new timeline, one where things are drastically accelerated.
"Battle tactics, Mr. Ryan"
Would like to see a bit more effort in a post, Pur.
Do a write up on the topic to share your insights or knowledge for the newbs.
Or offer a new analysis.
Do a breakdown.
Q made these drops quite a long time ago. We're not exactly in "New Q Drop!" territory any more, where simply pointing to a post was relevant or worthwhile.
Someone gave you a downvote. I'm not going to counter that, personally.
My suggestion: Post less, but put more effort in what you DO post.
Quite frankly, I don't give a shit about votes...up or down....I post what I think is relevant and try and get people to do their own research....That's what I did....Nobody really explained ANY posts to me and I did my own digging which was actually very beneficial.... I don't see why Others cannot do the same....As for posting less, that's NOT gonna happen....I post what I want, when I want....How about you doing a breakdown or analysis in the comments...??..If you don't like or agree with my content then just scroll past man....it's that simple....I'm not here to spoon-feed the lazy individuals who just love to downvote because I don't meet their "standards".....
Can't believe anyone would tell anyone how to post or what. Then to say you have to spend your time explaining it. The drop was so clear and even if it wasn't you did Great for sharing it. Spirits High and keep um coming!!
Thank you ...I appreciate the support....
Your welcome! I look forward to reading your posts!
As you can see every comment I make has ONE downvote regardless...."They" even downvote me saying "Amen" FFS...That should tell you everything you need to know...
Consider a down vote equivalent to 3 up votes! Your posting is spot on!!! They say it takes more energy to be negative than positive. Perhaps that's the only exercise they get.....:)
Thank you...I doubt they get any exercise...Physical or mental..
Fuck them....You Post exactly what you want to...I'm not normally like this but sometimes these condescending pricks really get under my skin...
All through the Q movement posts were explained by many. James corsi and praying medic, x-22 and a few more.
Yes, they did ....I explain every now and then depending on the content...We are not all the same...we are all different in our approach...My intentions are to get people to think and research for themselves.....
"My intentions are to get people to think and research for themselves."
Fair enough. I have no objection to that, and as I said, maybe I misjudged your intentions.
Yes, you did...
Well, I hope there are no hard feelings. I think I shared my feedback in fair and unaggressive language.
And frankly, I'm happy that I did share that feedback. I'd rather share with integrity than just ignore and say, got nothing to do with me.
Besides, you're quite prolific, so if my grasp of what you are doing has improved, I'm happy with that outcome.
No problem...it's all good...
Hmmm. I feel constrained here to offer some defense of my position and a clarification.
One, who cares about votes? The only reason I pointed it out, is because I see the votes as a feedback system. My comment here got 3 upvotes and 7 downvotes. I don't care about the votes (can I buy fuel with them?), but that indicates at least 10 individuals thought it worth their energy to share their feedback. For me, that's relevant.
Two, my comment was about effort. The general rules emphasize (all caps): "HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only!" I thought your post was low effort (I may very well have been wrong), but I shared my feedback on that. You don't have to agree, but it was not intended as an attack or as a demand.
Three, I offered suggestions. You don't have to agree, obviously, and I'm quite glad to have your response and to read it. I could have just ignored your post. Why didn't I? Because I get jollies in attacking others on GAW? (I think we're both better than that).
I take my time and effort on GAW seriously, and I don't think I'm wrong to attempt to engage you or anyone else in a serious conversation about what we do here, how it can be improved, or where we collectively find value. It's that simple.
Four, my point was NOT about people being spoon-fed or being provided content without doing the work. For me, a lot of the best value I got out of being involved in r/GA, v/QRV, and GWA was when I did my own analysis and discussion, shared that with others, and then engaged on that basis. Or when reading others' analysis, and then engaging.
If I reached the wrong conclusion about your efforts, and misjudged what you are attempting to do, then what? ... apology? I mean, I just offered feedback. Let's not make it anything more or less than that.
The reason I have "downvotes" is because I don't "post" content which pleases certain "retards" who follow me around just waiting to give me a downvote, regardless of the content....I don't have time to play games with these idiots....it's that simple...it gets boring and very tiresome....
Thank you, I appreciate it...And Yes, You have to think for yourself and come up with a conclusion...Not just take the word of others. Besides just making sense, wasn't that what Q told us to do?...I like to make people interested enough to go and see/enquire for themselves, and other times I give MY opinion...Once you have seen for yourself That's when you know...Or not...
Exactly. It's a tad ironic, because I thought that this was exactly what you were NOT doing, which is why I offered my feedback. I thought you were simply throwing up stuff, doing nothing more than that, without any serious thought or effort.
Glad to find out that it's not the case.
I also hope there is a clearer understanding between us now.
Q3662 and Q3906
Whoa. I think the only critic here is me (I see no other critical comments), and well, you're just plain 100% wrong when you state that I follow Purkiss. Sure, I do find u/purkiss80 posts significant ("interest" is your conclusion, not mine) - he's a prolific poster. Which is why I offered my feedback.
I am NOT to lazy to dig (How the 'f would you know that?) and I am NOT interested, just or otherwise, in packaged opinions (how do you come to that conclusion based on one comment?) and that "the critic here" is a 'not the think for yourself' type. That's total bulldust.
I'm sorry you drew all these totally false conclusions and then chose to throw them out there. Unwarranted.
Despite that, I'm quite happy for the entire dialog, because it's become an opportunity for me to reflect more on purkiss' contributions and maybe re-evaluated my own conclusions vis-a-vis that.
Or I could have just shut my mouth, NOT offered feedback, and remain ignorant.
I'm sad to see that genuinely offered feedback is unwelcome by some participants. So much ego here...
If "retards" are following you around in order to give you a downvote, then yes, I think quite possibly the appellation "retards" is appropriate. I will very rarely use a downvote. Very, very rarely.
This sounds like the perfect opportunity for you to do your own dig and present your findings to us and the newcomers. Digging of your own free will helps you find things you never would've found otherwise, and may open new opportunities for insightful conversations on this board about previously undiscovered topics or Qincidences
Agreed. It looks like I simply misjudged the OP's intentions and efforts. I saw three posts, all thrown up in quick succession, with no content other than the image of the Q drop.
I concluded low effort posting, without thought or investment, so I offered feedback. That's all. It was intended to be helpful.
It's all good. We're all trying our best on here to progress the great awakening. God bless fren
Thank you Maga.
wwg1
So, do you anything to say about the 16 yr plan?
Lol
Barack Hussein Obama. He was supposed to be in office for two terms. He was sending all our jobs over seas making us weak. Clinton was supposed to finish us off with globalism. When trump got elected the polls were flooded. They didn’t stand a chance