They probably want to finally use the alien propulsion technology that they reverse engineered in a wartime setting, but before they do that, they need to prepare the masses for what they are about to see on amateur video from Chinese warships.
The idea that the technology was kept locked away deep in the bowels of private companies for decades to prevent it from falling into the hands of the Rothchild cabal seems more believable every single day. The same people in the military that would be granted any level of knowledge of this, would be the same sort of people who have access to the most classified intercepted communications from politicians and other cabal members. Somebody like Adm Rogers long ago probably took charge of burying this shit until the right time, because they know if they exposed to the wrong politicians, the tech would just be sold to China.
It’s already patented. Been since the 1980s. Flying black triangles and pill shaped drones using electric fields to create some sort of gravity field that doesn’t have friction. It can go between air and water seamlessly, that’s why all the navy pilots say they saw it go in the water. The drawings and patent numbers are available, redacted into the dirt of course. But they exist and belong to the Navy.
It’s obvious they are real, and they are our own equipment. In this video of supposed unidentified triangle drones flying around a navy warship, they have visual the IR markers for IFF. Those aren’t ufos, they are drones. It’s a slow drip. All this bullshit about ufos harassing navy ships is bullshit. They are clearly marked with IR strobes.
We are already exploring our local area as much as possible for planets that are composed in a way that’s friendly to life, and our space exploration is less than a century old. What about a civilization a thousand years ahead? Or 100k years ahead? Or 3 million?
If we take it for granted that life exists out there based on the sheer probabilities, on a timeline measured in billions of years, it isn’t a stretch to imagine some alien science drone crashed into earth. We can see distant planets propensity for life using current satellites, why wouldn’t other civilizations have the same tech or far more? How many objects have we crashed into nearby planets in our own solar system for research purposes? How many more will we in the next 50k years?
We only been doing this space shit for 50-60 years and look at what we have done. What about a civilization who has been doing it for 50k?
I have patent numbers, too. Only one I know of that ever turned into military technology, and it was not alien science. Unless you are the inventor, you don't really know anything about it, so stop using it as a magic wand.
Makes for a great TV series. But this is all fantasy. There is no evidence and no technology. You can believe in you gut all you want to, but your gut has no I.Q.
I have already provided one piece of evidence of the navy destroyer video. Here is the second piece, https://patents.google.com/patent/US20060145019A1/en
A patent for a triangular spacecraft from the US navy.
So instead of relying on broad sweeping dismissal of my evidence based on nothing but your gut feeling that you are right, why don’t you refute my evidence? Are you suggesting both of these items are fantasy? That you have a high iQ?
Let me give you a tip. Next time you should say this is fantasy because.... Or you are wrong because..... and then you actually say something useful and productive to prove my assertion is not correct.
You sound like a vaxxer. CNN hasn’t told you the navy most likely is testing alien propulsion for next gen drones, so you just ignore video of the fucking thing and the godamn patent for it, and refer to these things as fantasy, even though you can see them with your own eyes.
Actually if something is not true, then it can only be false. That's the way reality works. It is binary. If it weren't that way, we would have to be on the watchout for pixies and unicorns every time we turn a corner. At some point, we have to grow up.
I understand the relationship between true and false. But you stating that something is not true doesnt make it so. Who appointed you the final judge of the truth? I see your screen name but that tells me shit about your level of expertise and knowledge on the subject.
You ask the reader to dismiss Boozy but your reasoning is nothing but a "Because I said so".
Actually if something is not true, then it can only be false. That's the way reality works.
That's not what he said, though. He said "STATING something is not true doesn't make it false." That is an accurate statement. Your statement or proclamation does not determine the reality of the thing. It's independent of any statement. That's the way reality works.
You tried to change that into him saying, absurdly, "Something not being true doesn't make it false."
They probably want to finally use the alien propulsion technology that they reverse engineered in a wartime setting, but before they do that, they need to prepare the masses for what they are about to see on amateur video from Chinese warships.
The idea that the technology was kept locked away deep in the bowels of private companies for decades to prevent it from falling into the hands of the Rothchild cabal seems more believable every single day. The same people in the military that would be granted any level of knowledge of this, would be the same sort of people who have access to the most classified intercepted communications from politicians and other cabal members. Somebody like Adm Rogers long ago probably took charge of burying this shit until the right time, because they know if they exposed to the wrong politicians, the tech would just be sold to China.
Why bother presenting it as alien tech? Why not say we engineered it cuz we's the GOAT?
Dream on. There isn't any alien technology hidden under wraps. Hoping it is true is not proof it is true.
It’s already patented. Been since the 1980s. Flying black triangles and pill shaped drones using electric fields to create some sort of gravity field that doesn’t have friction. It can go between air and water seamlessly, that’s why all the navy pilots say they saw it go in the water. The drawings and patent numbers are available, redacted into the dirt of course. But they exist and belong to the Navy.
Patented doesn't equal real.
It’s obvious they are real, and they are our own equipment. In this video of supposed unidentified triangle drones flying around a navy warship, they have visual the IR markers for IFF. Those aren’t ufos, they are drones. It’s a slow drip. All this bullshit about ufos harassing navy ships is bullshit. They are clearly marked with IR strobes.
We are already exploring our local area as much as possible for planets that are composed in a way that’s friendly to life, and our space exploration is less than a century old. What about a civilization a thousand years ahead? Or 100k years ahead? Or 3 million?
If we take it for granted that life exists out there based on the sheer probabilities, on a timeline measured in billions of years, it isn’t a stretch to imagine some alien science drone crashed into earth. We can see distant planets propensity for life using current satellites, why wouldn’t other civilizations have the same tech or far more? How many objects have we crashed into nearby planets in our own solar system for research purposes? How many more will we in the next 50k years?
We only been doing this space shit for 50-60 years and look at what we have done. What about a civilization who has been doing it for 50k?
I have patent numbers, too. Only one I know of that ever turned into military technology, and it was not alien science. Unless you are the inventor, you don't really know anything about it, so stop using it as a magic wand.
Makes for a great TV series. But this is all fantasy. There is no evidence and no technology. You can believe in you gut all you want to, but your gut has no I.Q.
Is that the best you got to play the smart guy?
I have already provided one piece of evidence of the navy destroyer video. Here is the second piece, https://patents.google.com/patent/US20060145019A1/en A patent for a triangular spacecraft from the US navy.
So instead of relying on broad sweeping dismissal of my evidence based on nothing but your gut feeling that you are right, why don’t you refute my evidence? Are you suggesting both of these items are fantasy? That you have a high iQ?
Let me give you a tip. Next time you should say this is fantasy because.... Or you are wrong because..... and then you actually say something useful and productive to prove my assertion is not correct.
You sound like a vaxxer. CNN hasn’t told you the navy most likely is testing alien propulsion for next gen drones, so you just ignore video of the fucking thing and the godamn patent for it, and refer to these things as fantasy, even though you can see them with your own eyes.
dunning-kruger
there are literally patents for this shit already. just like covid and its vaccine were patented years ago.
Lmao man are you gonna have your reality shattered.
And stating that its not true doesnt make it false.
So your point?
Actually if something is not true, then it can only be false. That's the way reality works. It is binary. If it weren't that way, we would have to be on the watchout for pixies and unicorns every time we turn a corner. At some point, we have to grow up.
I understand the relationship between true and false. But you stating that something is not true doesnt make it so. Who appointed you the final judge of the truth? I see your screen name but that tells me shit about your level of expertise and knowledge on the subject.
You ask the reader to dismiss Boozy but your reasoning is nothing but a "Because I said so".
That's not what he said, though. He said "STATING something is not true doesn't make it false." That is an accurate statement. Your statement or proclamation does not determine the reality of the thing. It's independent of any statement. That's the way reality works.
You tried to change that into him saying, absurdly, "Something not being true doesn't make it false."
Weak.
LOL
your comment must be satirical. you cant actually believe that if you have done even the smallest amount of research.