The Beast System is dependent on 5G for the microchip network to work. It is your Smart phone that will be used initially for making this possible. The Smart phone acts as the receiver for microchip micro-transmitting and then amplifies it for transmitting the microchip data to AI hubs. There will be no more privacy. You will be tracked just like a microchipped dog is tracked.
There is a far better technology that is much faster and safer than 5G technology. It is called LiFi. It is far more secure than 5G to. Why isn't this getting any traction? The reason is that it cannot penetrate walls or the human skin. LiFi is using light as in LED lighting. Right now, data can be sent through electrical lines. LiFi technology is line-of-sight. With the requirement for 5G being at the range of frequency it occupies, the distance traveled is requires much more energy to propagate it. As a result, 5G requires many, many more towers to make it feasible. 5G requires cell towers on every city block. In other words, 5G is essentially line-of-sight technology.
Li-Fi is far more versatile, safer, faster, and secure than 5G. The reason why 5G is being forced on us is because it is penetrating radiation making the implantable microchip technology reality. The Cabal has spent billions of dollars developing the 5G technology for enslaving all of mankind in their mark fo the beast system.
One of my criteria when buying my house was not too close to the cell towers. IIRC one wants to be at least 400m away, from some reports I found. Having kids etc I didn't want to live near that.
Yeah I remember the LiFi TED talk was pretty impressive tech.
Yeah I definitely never use phone to my ear I always use wired ear piece or speaker. Though Kamala caught some shit for not using Bluetooth, it is better for security to use a wired earphone. Besides I’d lose AirPods very easily.
"'5G requires cell towers on every city block'. that doesn't sound good."
This is why these 5G cells will be used in the cities and it'll be much harder to implement in rural areas. The plan is to disguise 5G towers to look like trees, street lights, etc.
The health implications of 5G are very troubling. More countries need to follow Slovenia's lead. In France freedom fighters are sabotaging the cell phone towers and power stations.There may be an alternative.
Since 5G relies on higher frequency for propagation, the higher frequency works against its ability to propagate distance-wise. Higher frequency is the inverse of distance traveled. This means much more power is required for transmission and many more booster/repeater transmitters (cells) are required. All this to make things 10 times faster.
Essentially, these 5G cells have become line-of-sight to each other. Light Fidelity (LiFi) technology is a 100 times faster than standard Wi-Fi. Wi-Fi is not 5G, but LiFi is still steadily growing in transmission range and overcoming obstacles in transmission paths. LiFi has strengths in energy efficiency and ultra-wide bandwidth.
LiFi offers higher data rates than 5G. Non-line-of-sight (NLOS) optical wireless is resistant to obstacles and is capable of adapting its throughput according to the current channel state information.
https://www.velmenni.com/blog/light-communication/
IMHO, I see this technology as being so much better than 5G. The power of light. We can do this.
"The power of the sun in the palm of my hand." -- Doctor Otto Octavius
Well, no. WiFi is faster. 5G is ~150-200 megabits per second. 5GHz WiFi is anywhere between 300-500, with 2.4GHz at up to around what 5G is.
5G's advantages over WiFi is the range, with 2.4GHz range being pretty short and 5GHz being shorter than that (though 5GHz is less crowded because of that).
Since 5G originates from towers, the distance covered is many, many, many times greater -- which would be why there are some concerned pilots.
"Since 5G originates from towers, the distance covered is many, many, many times greater -- which would be why there are some concerned pilots."
Higher frequency is the inverse of distance traveled. It requires more power to transmit higher frequencies. Therefore, 5G requires many more times the towers (repeaters) than currently present.
Yeah, 5g cell towers is an obvious lie because 5g only travels 500 meters compared to 45 miles and about 1600 something meters are in a mile (not exact but guesstamate). It can only go so far because how millimeter waves function so when they say they improved the range its a lie and just 4g. 5g is like a microwave almost. They put boxes on power lines and claim towers are 5g.
Too bad I don't use a cell phone/tracking device. BTW, phones don't even get 4G around my house and barely get 3G.
Also, they would have to put towers on some people's property to get them close enough because of trees being in the way. I can't see that happening in my area.
5G doesn't refer to the frequencies directly. It stands for 5th generation. There will be a large range of frequencies use for 5G. They have all been used in the past with no bad effects that I've heard of. The problem with 5G is that it will enable the "internet of things." Thankfully, I don't have any smart devices at all. I don't have a cell phone or TV, and my computer is over 10 years old and built by me, so I know what's in it.
You are right that 5G means 5th generation, but there is a higher frequency range being used. Some people refer to it as millimeter wave technology. 5G is expected to use from around 24 GHz all the way up to 300 GHz.
The US Military’s Microwave crowd control weapon called the 'Active Denial System'. It disperses crowds by heating up their skins. It uses the 95 GHz. Note that this is well within the range of 5G. This frequency is well below the 300 GHz frequency some 5G devices may use. And all of these RF Radiation frequencies are “non-ionizing”. The power level of this system is much higher, but it utilizes a frequency within the 5G range.
"They have all been used in the past with no bad effects that I've heard of."
Beyond cancer, multiple peer-reviewed scientific studies have also demonstrated that exposure to this type of radiation can result in a wide variety of conditions, including:
The bad effects happen above a certain wattage range...and proximity to a router/transceiver. I’ve heard reports of offices & Hospitals where 5G was integrated and the sickness rates spiked. The 60Ghz EMF range excites polarized water resulting in heat…what happens in your microwave. This is another experiment by big tech that nobody will be accountable for, period. The long term effects are a mystery, but close prox to a transceiver in short term is frightening imo. They surrounded a city park in Rotterdam (it was in Netherlands) and the power output was too high on all the transmitters and all the birds in the park DIED. I have my FCC License and used to tweak transmitters.
Thankfully, living on a very large wooded lot means there won't be any antennas close enough to me for 5G stuff to work. Right now, there is no 4G here and barely 3G for anyone to call out.
That’s bad and good actually. Having a basic lifeline is good, but being remote will keep the 5G away. I’m in a similar scenario…there will never be 5G in these wooded hills. I barely have one bar 4G!!
Microwaves (as in a microwave oven) do not "ionize" water. It heats water, to the boiling point if desired. And it takes power on the order of a kilowatt to get the job done. Be careful about knowing what you think you know.
You’re correct, I was shooting off the cuff. I just reread microwave oven theory of operation and my bad; I confused ionization with EMF heating in polarized water molecules. I’m gonna mail in my license; guess this Boomer’s been retired too long? Love your name…you ever play with lasers, as in boosting their power? Fun stuff. This guy gets-it;
"5G requires cell towers on every city block" is only true for the millimeter-wave band frequencies. The frequencies that the FAA is arguing against is the about-to-be-released C-Band frequencies which penetrate much better and doesn't need many more towers than existing 4G services.
Your points on Li-Fi are good arguments against millimeter-wave band frequencies, but to be honest, that isn't the future of 5G (likely limited to stadiums and very busy city streets).
Those dog microchips typically just contain the owners info, they aren't like a GPS tracker. Basically if the dog is found then a vet or a shelter can scan the chip to get the owners phone number, name, address, etc. and return the dog.
Your phone is already doing all of the things talked about in this thread, they don't need a microchip to do all this, LOL!!
That's the basic technology that's been in existence for a long time now. The technology capability is much more advanced.
"Your phone is already doing all of the things talked about in this thread, they don't need a microchip to do all this, LOL!!"
I got rid of my spy phone over 2 years ago. LOL.
The microchip is going to be used as an ear tag. Your smart phone just receives and amplifies the signal until further technology leaves smart phones outdated..
You are not wrong. But think about wearable devices like fitbit etc that monitor your health and what their limitations are. Now think about a device that stays in your system and communicates with your phone and the possibilities. It's about continuous monitoring in the name of prevention. But as we know, that's not a sustainable business model.
The Beast System is dependent on 5G for the microchip network to work. It is your Smart phone that will be used initially for making this possible. The Smart phone acts as the receiver for microchip micro-transmitting and then amplifies it for transmitting the microchip data to AI hubs. There will be no more privacy. You will be tracked just like a microchipped dog is tracked.
There is a far better technology that is much faster and safer than 5G technology. It is called LiFi. It is far more secure than 5G to. Why isn't this getting any traction? The reason is that it cannot penetrate walls or the human skin. LiFi is using light as in LED lighting. Right now, data can be sent through electrical lines. LiFi technology is line-of-sight. With the requirement for 5G being at the range of frequency it occupies, the distance traveled is requires much more energy to propagate it. As a result, 5G requires many, many more towers to make it feasible. 5G requires cell towers on every city block. In other words, 5G is essentially line-of-sight technology.
Li-Fi is far more versatile, safer, faster, and secure than 5G. The reason why 5G is being forced on us is because it is penetrating radiation making the implantable microchip technology reality. The Cabal has spent billions of dollars developing the 5G technology for enslaving all of mankind in their mark fo the beast system.
"5G requires cell towers on every city block"
that doesn't sound good.
One of my criteria when buying my house was not too close to the cell towers. IIRC one wants to be at least 400m away, from some reports I found. Having kids etc I didn't want to live near that.
Yeah I remember the LiFi TED talk was pretty impressive tech.
Yeah I definitely never use phone to my ear I always use wired ear piece or speaker. Though Kamala caught some shit for not using Bluetooth, it is better for security to use a wired earphone. Besides I’d lose AirPods very easily.
Well said
This is why these 5G cells will be used in the cities and it'll be much harder to implement in rural areas. The plan is to disguise 5G towers to look like trees, street lights, etc.
The health implications of 5G are very troubling. More countries need to follow Slovenia's lead. In France freedom fighters are sabotaging the cell phone towers and power stations.There may be an alternative.
Since 5G relies on higher frequency for propagation, the higher frequency works against its ability to propagate distance-wise. Higher frequency is the inverse of distance traveled. This means much more power is required for transmission and many more booster/repeater transmitters (cells) are required. All this to make things 10 times faster.
Essentially, these 5G cells have become line-of-sight to each other. Light Fidelity (LiFi) technology is a 100 times faster than standard Wi-Fi. Wi-Fi is not 5G, but LiFi is still steadily growing in transmission range and overcoming obstacles in transmission paths. LiFi has strengths in energy efficiency and ultra-wide bandwidth.
LiFi offers higher data rates than 5G. Non-line-of-sight (NLOS) optical wireless is resistant to obstacles and is capable of adapting its throughput according to the current channel state information. https://www.velmenni.com/blog/light-communication/ IMHO, I see this technology as being so much better than 5G. The power of light. We can do this.
"The power of the sun in the palm of my hand." -- Doctor Otto Octavius
Well, no. WiFi is faster. 5G is ~150-200 megabits per second. 5GHz WiFi is anywhere between 300-500, with 2.4GHz at up to around what 5G is.
5G's advantages over WiFi is the range, with 2.4GHz range being pretty short and 5GHz being shorter than that (though 5GHz is less crowded because of that).
Since 5G originates from towers, the distance covered is many, many, many times greater -- which would be why there are some concerned pilots.
Higher frequency is the inverse of distance traveled. It requires more power to transmit higher frequencies. Therefore, 5G requires many more times the towers (repeaters) than currently present.
Yeah, 5g cell towers is an obvious lie because 5g only travels 500 meters compared to 45 miles and about 1600 something meters are in a mile (not exact but guesstamate). It can only go so far because how millimeter waves function so when they say they improved the range its a lie and just 4g. 5g is like a microwave almost. They put boxes on power lines and claim towers are 5g.
It's also not true, as 5G has been rolled out in several places already.
Too bad I don't use a cell phone/tracking device. BTW, phones don't even get 4G around my house and barely get 3G.
Also, they would have to put towers on some people's property to get them close enough because of trees being in the way. I can't see that happening in my area.
5G doesn't refer to the frequencies directly. It stands for 5th generation. There will be a large range of frequencies use for 5G. They have all been used in the past with no bad effects that I've heard of. The problem with 5G is that it will enable the "internet of things." Thankfully, I don't have any smart devices at all. I don't have a cell phone or TV, and my computer is over 10 years old and built by me, so I know what's in it.
You are right that 5G means 5th generation, but there is a higher frequency range being used. Some people refer to it as millimeter wave technology. 5G is expected to use from around 24 GHz all the way up to 300 GHz.
The US Military’s Microwave crowd control weapon called the 'Active Denial System'. It disperses crowds by heating up their skins. It uses the 95 GHz. Note that this is well within the range of 5G. This frequency is well below the 300 GHz frequency some 5G devices may use. And all of these RF Radiation frequencies are “non-ionizing”. The power level of this system is much higher, but it utilizes a frequency within the 5G range.
What does the world's foremost expert state about 'non-ionizing' radiation?
Beyond cancer, multiple peer-reviewed scientific studies have also demonstrated that exposure to this type of radiation can result in a wide variety of conditions, including:
Nausea
Hair loss;
Swelling;
Low energy;
Appetite loss;
Bone marrow damage;
Depression;
Organs damage;
Confusion;
Incapacitation and death; and Infections.
I was gonna mention Active Denial Systems but saw you had 👍🏽
The bad effects happen above a certain wattage range...and proximity to a router/transceiver. I’ve heard reports of offices & Hospitals where 5G was integrated and the sickness rates spiked. The 60Ghz EMF range excites polarized water resulting in heat…what happens in your microwave. This is another experiment by big tech that nobody will be accountable for, period. The long term effects are a mystery, but close prox to a transceiver in short term is frightening imo. They surrounded a city park in Rotterdam (it was in Netherlands) and the power output was too high on all the transmitters and all the birds in the park DIED. I have my FCC License and used to tweak transmitters.
A few years ago here, there waa a big flock of dead birds on the side of the road.
People were concerned... the answer that was given was that they had flown into a bus.... made no sense, they didn't show any trauma or damage.
You’d think they could get more creative?! C’Mon MAN!!
Thankfully, living on a very large wooded lot means there won't be any antennas close enough to me for 5G stuff to work. Right now, there is no 4G here and barely 3G for anyone to call out.
That’s bad and good actually. Having a basic lifeline is good, but being remote will keep the 5G away. I’m in a similar scenario…there will never be 5G in these wooded hills. I barely have one bar 4G!!
Microwaves (as in a microwave oven) do not "ionize" water. It heats water, to the boiling point if desired. And it takes power on the order of a kilowatt to get the job done. Be careful about knowing what you think you know.
You’re correct, I was shooting off the cuff. I just reread microwave oven theory of operation and my bad; I confused ionization with EMF heating in polarized water molecules. I’m gonna mail in my license; guess this Boomer’s been retired too long? Love your name…you ever play with lasers, as in boosting their power? Fun stuff. This guy gets-it;
https://youtu.be/IzUoe-9bKa0
The reason for new "smart" meters being installed on homes everywhere....
"5G requires cell towers on every city block" is only true for the millimeter-wave band frequencies. The frequencies that the FAA is arguing against is the about-to-be-released C-Band frequencies which penetrate much better and doesn't need many more towers than existing 4G services.
Your points on Li-Fi are good arguments against millimeter-wave band frequencies, but to be honest, that isn't the future of 5G (likely limited to stadiums and very busy city streets).
Explain?
Dogs are microchipped.
Those dog microchips typically just contain the owners info, they aren't like a GPS tracker. Basically if the dog is found then a vet or a shelter can scan the chip to get the owners phone number, name, address, etc. and return the dog.
Your phone is already doing all of the things talked about in this thread, they don't need a microchip to do all this, LOL!!
That's the basic technology that's been in existence for a long time now. The technology capability is much more advanced.
I got rid of my spy phone over 2 years ago. LOL.
The microchip is going to be used as an ear tag. Your smart phone just receives and amplifies the signal until further technology leaves smart phones outdated..
You are not wrong. But think about wearable devices like fitbit etc that monitor your health and what their limitations are. Now think about a device that stays in your system and communicates with your phone and the possibilities. It's about continuous monitoring in the name of prevention. But as we know, that's not a sustainable business model.
Watch this video
https://youtu.be/Uio8X1h0H-E
22 minutes in talking about 5G and it being able to handle the bandwidth of continuous monitoring
Some are, yes. That doesn't mean they're movie magic tracking devices, so please explain.
okay so my phone is 4G. What to do with it after Jan 19th? No 5g towers close to home thank goodness.