Freedom or Bust
(media.patriots.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (90)
sorted by:
He is without a doubt Illuminati......so what is the play here? Photos of this man clearly covering up one eye like all the rest abound on the internet - so what is the play here having him defy the holy Covid19 vax.?
I wonder sometimes how much of that is the photog saying "now cover your eye with the tennis racket" type stuff and the people being photographed not knowing? Serious question.
It’s 100% that. I’m a creative Director and have done many shoots like this, both in entertainment and sports. There are no scary higher ups telling us what symbolism to put into our shots. And there’s zero chance the talent is directing us, “I REALLY should cover one eye in this shot. It’s really important to me and my message.”
Come on people.
I, like most people, have had photos taken of me my entire life, birthdays, parties, graduations, weddings, bodybuilding competitions, etc. I have NEVER been asked to cover my face, or eye, or make symbols with my hands either from the friends and family that take most of them, or even from the professional photographers that pose me for paid or promotional shots. This is purely my experience, and anecdotal I know. I would almost agree with you on "creative freedom" but after watching montage after montage of Anons compiling all the imagery and connecting the dots from all these different photographers that are somehow using the exact same "creative freedom," it kind of looks pretty darn intentional (hence the conspiracy surrounding it I suppose), or at the very least actually process a total lack of creativity because once you see the same pose documented hundreds of times by hundreds of different individuals how creative can it really be?
You’re correct. My only point is that the talent (athletes, stars, etc) are usually not the ones making those decisions. They’re just doing what they’re told. So if there is an Illuminati connection, which I believe there is, it’s more likely that it’s higher ups who are dictating the creative direction and symbolism.
It’s not creative at all. And it is symbolism for sure. All I’ve been saying is it’s not the talent suggesting or choosing the creative direction. They’re just doing what they’re told.
Artists don’t make details by mistake.
He’s not an artist, he’s just a tennis player doing what his contract requires. Now if someone said the directors of these shoots were Illuminati then fine, I can get behind that. But Novak posing means next to nothing
I've wondered as well.
Maybe, but at some point you have to get curious why every other photo of you is covering up one of your eyes.....?
...and most have been verified deepstate pawns..
You should expand on this with a separate post. Everyone here should read it. The artists are the sickos, giving the art direction. The celebrities are the talent, they show up and change outfits as requested.
The real question is are the artists in on it, acting under some sort of orders or they just keep perpetuating the stupid symbols and hand gestures as they know what they have been trained ?
Agreed. I can't help but picture Zoolander when these things come up, because part of me thinks the talent is in on it, but part of me sees Zoolander there being told "You're a monkey, Derek! Be a monkey" and Zoolander trying his darndest to look like a monkey lol
You do have to remember that SOME of these folks have no idea what the symbolism they're doing means. They're just posing for the camera as direction from their management.
This guy is / was on tap to being one of the greatest tennis players to live. You really think someone would give all that up if they were in on it? I'm sorry to break your bubble, but... they're not ALL in on it. A good 90-95% sure.
Some of them ARE just going through the motions given by their management. You do the interviews, you do the photo shoots, you do the press conferences - all part of your contract. The subjects don't pick their poses or costumes, it's all done by the photographer and their management.
Thank you for this comment, Frazzle.
I've been reflecting deeply on some related points, as I find some freedom warriors focusing more and more on the dark interpretations, seeing controlled opposition everywhere, traps from the black hats everywhere, and it all starts to look so dark.
I really think that we should be practicing a bit of discrimination in terms of what we choose to believe, or not. And the more the evidence is limited, the more our choices in what we believe become like an amplifier.
If we choose to believe the worst in people, we build up and create a reality in our own hearts that become an actual obstacle to seeing the best.
People need to ask themselves, how is it possible for Jesus Christ to love every single person. Because he does. he loves them with a passion, he loves them to an absolute unchanging level. Jesus didn't just willingly sacrifice his life for you, or me, or for Trump. He sacrificed his life for Stalin, for Hitler, for Hillary.
How could he do that? How is that possible? How is it that he can see value in these people even when they are so black, and even when you and I generally just cannot?
He sees something we do not, and because he is focused on that, he loves them. Do they grieve him? Yes, beyond words. Yes, beyond description of pain. Their evil actions inflict unspeakable agony on his heart, because he loves their victims, but he also loves them.
How do you feel when someone you love does something evil, hurtful, unrighteous? It hurts.
The Evil Cabal have worked very, very hard to saturate our world and our environment with their toxicity, their poison, and their culture. How many are participating in that environment, as oblivious to its evil nature as the normies are to the evil behavior of the Media, for example? Oblivious.
Some freedom warriors rag on and hate on the "sheeple" so much. They despise them, mock them, groan at their faults. But is this love? Is this the way forward?
Look at the Canadian truckers. I swear, hearing come of those Canadian warriors express their anger sounds like someone hopped up on weed to the max. mellowed out on (I don't know) whatever mellows people out. They are so mellow, so gentle, so righteous in their attitude.
What's my point here? My point is, They are not even hating on Trudeau. They aren't. They are all about loving their country and their people, and Trudeau is merely a problem in the way. Their focus is what? It is overwhelmingly wholesome and positive and therefore extremely, extremely powerful.
There are a number of people who have been connected to the World Economic Forum, many who are plainly black hats and have succumbed to the corrupt agenda. But there are also others, who have been sincere, I believe, in their involvement. Heck, I had NO idea about how evil Klaus Schwab is, or even how evil Bill Gates is, until I began to wake up.
We have to be able to get beyond guilt by association. I'm not saying just be naive and don't be discerning. But also be discerning in what and how we choose to evaluate and value people. Guilt by association is not a good method. Think about how many people think Donald Trump was or is evil simply because he was rich, and wealthy, and one of the "elites" in American society. That was my first idea about Trump, until I actual listened to his speeches in early 2016.
Let's not judge people by their associations or even by their past. People change. People grow. If we remove the possibility of people being able to change, repent, grow, or if we fail to judge people NOT by their actions, but by their past history or associations, well, we run an excellent chance of condemning ourselves. Because in truth, "there is no one righteous, not even one".
Excellent points.
and
How could he do that? How is that possible? How is it that he can see value in these people even when they are so black, and even when you and I generally just cannot?
I live by the faith that no one is born evil. We, everyone, were all once kids ; innocent, pure and free of so many things. Someone has to endure evil to become it.
Indeed. I guess the way I actually see this involves a few things.
One is that the sad reality of our human condition is that, since the time of Adam and Eve (whenever or whatever, that time was) human beings inherited fallen nature. Fallen nature is also fallen angelic nature, inherited by Eve and then Adam through their relationship with the Angel Lucifer.
Two is that every human is originally created by God. So we have God's nature within us. That cannot be removed.
So we have our original nature, which is Godly, which is good, and which is our true nature and character. And we have fallen nature, which is a distortion, an unnatural twisting of our original nature.
God, and Christ, relate to our original nature, while the devil relates to our fallen nature. Each seeks to exert their influence - Christ through love, forgiveness, compassion, truth, unselfishness, and the devil via lies, hate (including self-hate), distorted self-centeredness, etc.
I try to look for that original spark in people. When I see someone acting in an evil way, I try to look "into" that person to try and see, what they were like before they became evil, distorted, and what they WOULD be like, if that distortion were removed, and their original potential developed, grown, matured.
It's much easier to love people when you see in them what they MIGHT have been, and what they were, and also the terrible damage their choices have made on them.
From this vantage point, there is no joy, relish or satisfaction in hating Hillary or even in wishing for her demise. There is no doubt that she must be held accountable, both in our realm, and also she WILL inevitably be held accountable in that realm, too. BUT from that vantage point, one doesn't hate her. Rather, one mourns the corruption and destruction of one more of God's children.
It's at that point that love wrestles with the anger, with the outrage, with the despite towards such evil, but it's only when love wins that things can go their correct course, and the path of the least damage and the maximum benefit emerges, for all.
From a metaphysical or spiritual perspective, because we inherit this fallen nature through our lineage, in a sense, we are all born evil. But in truth, when we are born, we are born both good and evil, and the good part is predominant. Children are very pure.
However, at some point, God's work needs to happen such that this fallen nature is removed from our lineages. Completely. So that it ISN'T passed on from generation to generation. When it is passed on, each generation has to fight again to resist the evil, to maximize and grow our good nature. If the fallen nature - the root of it - is removed from our lineages, then it will not be passed on, and children will be able to grow their original nature naturally, without being under attack.
My understanding is that this is in fact the purpose of the Second Coming. The first coming opened the door to spiritual salvation, and spiritual rebirth into CHrist's lineage, out of the satanic lineage.
The Second Coming has to take place so that Christ can open the door to physical salvation, where our bodies are NOT subject to Satan's claim, and where the fallen nature is rooted out of our flesh, as well.
Note:" physical salvation does not mean the physical form becomes eternal. Rather, it means that the physical form can fulfill its original role free from Satanic claim. The original role of our body is to provide the soil in which our spirits grow, by being the vehicle by which we are present in the world, and can doo good, love others, and grow our capacity to love in all relationships.
With apologies for the lengthy ramble. Sorry! Favorite topic!
Yo…that is beautiful. The human condition is complex and we are (everybody is) QUICK TO JUDGE. Only God may judge. It’s in our nature and being “IN SPIRIT” or with Christ a lot of that gets removed. It’s not all removed, however we become more discerning in our quick emotional reactivity. My point is hard to describe in words. Regardless, your statement of how can God love the Hitler, Stalin, Hillary…because the soul is not evil; I believe it boils down to demonic attachments. IMHO.
I love it when people make comments that encapsulate in one or two sentences what I labor to express in a hundred sentences.
Regardless of terminology differences that abound when people talk about these things, I believe you have pointed out the gist of it, and the fundamental facts.
I’m sorry but this is the dumbest thing I’ve seen repeated on here. You think because they pose in a way that a photographer tells them to that it makes them Illuminati?? I thought Q was about getting people to think, not reducing their brain power to basic responses to stimuli. This is just like the media saying Trump is a racist because he used a white power sign, but all his actions speak otherwise.
You’re confused in your question because your foundational understanding is flawed
Lady, you have homework to do. Lots of homework.
I suggest you start with Will Zoll's "Prussia Gate Papers" on substack.
After that, find General Smedley Butler's books and read them.
Next, find Bill Cooper's "Behold a Pale Horse" and read it. (This one is especially good e cause he used his security clearance to actually get copies of documents and printed them in the book. Straight from the "horse's mouth.")
Search up David Icke after reading Cooper. You can find his videos on bitchute, YT, Rumble, etc.
DO NOT deviate from the order I gave you. If you do, you do so at the risk of cognitive dissonance creeping into your brain. Leave Icke's words for last. It takes a truly opened mind to fully digest what he has to say.
You really trust David Icke though? I put him on a similar level as Alex Jones. They wouldn't be allowed to say what they do unless they did so at the direction of a higher authority.
I actually just looked up your first suggestion. I do not see "Prussia Gate Papers" on this website: https://prussiagate.substack.com/ there are several articles but nothing with that direct name
I work in this industry. I know what goes into the shoots. It’s not what you’re imagining at all
SHE'S A CREATIVE DIRECTOR. SHE KNOWS BETTER THAN ANYONE! -__-
Congratulations. You have now posted the dumbest thing I have ever read here on GA. You assume my foundations are flawed, however your entire premise starts with a fucking assumption that you have ZERO evidence or support to backup; that he is simply posing the way a photographer has told him to and he is simply just a victim in all of this. Don’t you think if he doesn’t understand what’s going on at some point just out of curiosity he would ask the photographer, “Why in the fuck does nearly every picture you take of me have a tennis shoe, or a tennis ball, or my racket, or my hand covering up one of my eyes”?
I simply asked a question, which based upon all experiences to date with professional athletes and their photo-ops show striking similarities and symbolism with the eye, makes perfect sense to ask the question I did.
You have made yourself look like an absolute ass and know it all when you are simply bloviating an opinion founded on an assumption, but because it’s yours you are obviously correct and I am dumb. The only dumb thing I have done is respond to your idiocy - bystanders have now confused me with you.
Agreed! Claiming to be a creative director with photoshoot experience isn't going to win this argument, lady. I can say the same for myself. Only I don't work with the elite, nor the Illuminati in my shoots. Do you? Your comments on the symbolism chatter being "the dumbest thing you've seen repeated here" because you're a creative director, to me, sounds just as stupid. You know nothing more (and can prove nothing more) of the truth behind these images than we do/can. Please stop pretending so.
Is it possible that a lot of these stars are instructed to pose a certain way? Absolutely. Does it mean that the THOUSANDS of images in the past who knows how many years of it being done is "just a photographer directing the shoot"? Highly doubtful! I'm all for rationality, but please quit pretending that you know it all.
People SHOULD question all of the symbolism - it's everywhere. If we'd noticed it long before now, maybe we wouldn't be where we are.
But. I do know I was wrong to insult you, whether I agreed or not. So I am sorry for that. I shouldn’t post when I barely wake up
Lol except none of his actions match your hypothesis. Try again smart guy.
His wife did tweet that she admires the spirit and soul of Marina Abramovic, someone listed it in a post yesterday.
Q said something along the lines of “watch the wives”. There’s Truth in that. My issue with Musk is just that? In trying to discern whether he’s good or bad I gotta always look at his “woman” (who he does still see I hear) and wonder? Then there’s his Boring Company…the tunnels, but that’s not my point. So if Novak’s wife admires Marina? Utter SLIME.
Watch the wives has to be very selectively applied because married couples part ways daily and often it is because of major differences in their lives. People get married for wrong reasons all the time and discover they are no good for each other.
That woman is disgusting af
Nothing turns up i a search for me, maybe she did. At minimum that makes her an ignorant/naive Serbian who only knows her as a Serbian artist
It seems like you’re the confused one. Symbolism is a powerful tool. Most of our public figures are going to be involved in this kind of shit. Are you familiar with humiliation rituals?
Controlled opposition. Sleeper cells of cabal agents whispering sweet nothings to you on Twitter and In The news. The cabal/DS isn't stupid they have been at this for awhile. You got people like Novak, Gabbard, and Dan gay pirate Crenshaw plus others. They are the contingency plan. The DS loses these WEF folks take the wheel of the now defunct DS/Cabal controlled party and again say the right things and tell you they love apple pies and America with promises of bring back the Democratic party back to democracy etc. Then this cycle we are in now begins anew.
His name is basically Novax. How many coincidences?
His name isn’t Novax at all