It might be a long road to the end, but there might be shortcuts along the way, anon.
The reality is we're in psychological warfare, and we are on the road to surpass the threshold of critical mass awakening. It's only a question of when at this point.
People complying are afraid of repercussions, meaning one person strong and refusing to comply can spark bravery in 100's of 1000's of them.
Do your best to keep your chin up and aid in this awakening. Stay positive, stay strong, avoid that blackpill.
You're right anon, spiritual warfare is what it is. That's the secret of how the strongest can rise in these times.
But none of us knows the day or hour it will occur. We could be in a skirmish we are set to win and have some peace until the real battle happens in several generations or more. No one knows.
All we can do is be the best we can and keep an eye on what it takes to win the fight.
Also find it interesting that 3 of the choices are pro Trudeau and one is anti. Basically the answers should be yes or no, these answers are aligned to give more weight to diminish the response and make it more likely that people side with him. Exaggerated, the problem could have 99 pro Trudeau options and 1 anti. Unless that option hit over 50% their headline can read, "oh look it's a mixed opinion on protesters and the actions of the government"
In addition to what was mentioned by others, every time you click on the poll the order of the questions is always the same with the 1st answer being the want they want to be the most popular and the one they don't like being 2nd last. Only higher than the "I don't know option".
The proper way to do this would be to randomize the order of answers so that the order is eliminated as a factor. Due to human nature, some answers will be more common just based on their order in the questionnaire (my guess would be the 1st one gets that advantage). For example, there may be a person who doesn't read the answers and just lazily picks the 1st choice every time they randomly do surveys.
Taking all the other things into account, this is an excellent example on how to rig a survey. The only down side is it's very obvious and not subtle at all per the following:
3 of 5 answers support their position. So even if a bot was choosing answers at random, they would get the result they want.
Answers they want picked are always ordered 1st.
Survey wording is intentionally confusing and obfuscated so only someone who pays close attention will actually pick what they want. The end result is a tendency towards either randomness (which favours them per 1 above) or towards getting confused/frustrated with the survey because it requires mental effort and just picking the 1st answer to get it out of the way (which favours them per 2 above).
Keep in mind, there is a reason the Toronto Star is called the Red Star. Even among many leftists it is considered to be garbage. I could go on and on about why this newspaper is the lowest form of trash but I will end by saying that their articles read like an opinion sections (no argument, poorly written, tell you what they think even as it makes no sense, peak ultra-leftist echo chamber) and their opinion sections read like articles (usually contradict the point of the newspaper / are right leaning, are well written, provide arguments and evidence to backup their points and make sense).
They always do that on government and propaganda sites. Foodstamps app in Fla. asks you if you eat and buy food as a list with everyone you have in your household. Many people confused by that because children don't buy food...
you want my ansa, not one Protester should have been removed,.wether they picked them up nice and gently carriied to a safe spot some where and gently put them back down again, NO Protester should have been removed,..
One key protest organizer, Tamara Lich, also appeared in court, where the Crown said they intend to hold her accountable for every day that demonstrators tried to “hold the line” against police — a phrase that’s become the rallying cry for her and other leaders.
This is a terribly made poll. This should be on a more linear scale, but as u/patriotic_legend pointed out, only 1 answer is in support of allowing the peaceful protests to continue, while the 3 answers are in favour of police interference to varying degrees, and 1 answer is the standard ‘don’t know’ option.
Also, it gives too much ‘narrative’ information in the answers, allowing for biases and confusion.
Yes, this poll is bad. Even the one no question is designed to further the communist narrative. "Mostly peaceful?" That's how they described blm while a city block burned behind the reporter.
Have your say: Do you think police have used the right amount of force in clearing protesters in Ottawa?
No, they're using too much force on predominantly peaceful protesters. 55.02% (3,393 votes)
Yes, they've been clearing protesters without escalating the situation. 18.63% (1,149 votes)
Yes, they've been doing what's necessary to get the capital under control. 15.18% (936 votes)
No, I think they should've used more force and cleared the city sooner. 10.62% (655 votes)
Have your say: Do you think police have used the right amount of force in clearing protesters in Ottawa?
No, they're using too much force on predominantly peaceful protesters. 62.16% (5,164 votes)
Yes, they've been clearing protesters without escalating the situation. 15.9% (1,321 votes)
Yes, they've been doing what's necessary to get the capital under control. 12.49% (1,038 votes)
No, I think they should've used more force and cleared the city sooner. 8.93% (742 votes)
I laugh at these polls because these idiots are gonna do what they’re gonna do anyway. My job does these polls all the time and nothing changes.
Think of it this way, if the poll goes the direction the person wants it to, it empowers them and think they are doing the right job. If the poll goes the way they don’t want to, they blame external factors and continue to do what they want to do anyway…
They don’t care about your opinion they care about reaffirming their decisions
They intentionally worded the choices to confuse people who just quickly look at it. So, please be sure to carefully read the choices!
Agreed, there's only 1 real "no" but 2 "yes" and 1 "no" that can used to support a narrative.
that real no needs to have a higher total # of votes than the 2 yes + 1 no that can support a narrative.
update EXCELLENT JOB ANONS!!!*
1 real no = 2,326
2 Yes's + 1 no = 2,295
have some faith anon, i put faith in the anons here and they have not let these polls down yet
It might be a long road to the end, but there might be shortcuts along the way, anon.
The reality is we're in psychological warfare, and we are on the road to surpass the threshold of critical mass awakening. It's only a question of when at this point.
People complying are afraid of repercussions, meaning one person strong and refusing to comply can spark bravery in 100's of 1000's of them.
Do your best to keep your chin up and aid in this awakening. Stay positive, stay strong, avoid that blackpill.
You're right anon, spiritual warfare is what it is. That's the secret of how the strongest can rise in these times.
But none of us knows the day or hour it will occur. We could be in a skirmish we are set to win and have some peace until the real battle happens in several generations or more. No one knows.
All we can do is be the best we can and keep an eye on what it takes to win the fight.
Most will not read Revelation. I'm with you in that the future will be difficult for those who choose to not believe in and trust that Jesus is God.
Up to 63% just now.
I will guarantee that they seed the poll initially with the approved narrative votes.
3,950 now
Up to 52% now
Also find it interesting that 3 of the choices are pro Trudeau and one is anti. Basically the answers should be yes or no, these answers are aligned to give more weight to diminish the response and make it more likely that people side with him. Exaggerated, the problem could have 99 pro Trudeau options and 1 anti. Unless that option hit over 50% their headline can read, "oh look it's a mixed opinion on protesters and the actions of the government"
That's why it's called Legacy Media, anon.
First thing I noticed even in my inebriated state. I'm damn proud of myself.
In addition to what was mentioned by others, every time you click on the poll the order of the questions is always the same with the 1st answer being the want they want to be the most popular and the one they don't like being 2nd last. Only higher than the "I don't know option".
The proper way to do this would be to randomize the order of answers so that the order is eliminated as a factor. Due to human nature, some answers will be more common just based on their order in the questionnaire (my guess would be the 1st one gets that advantage). For example, there may be a person who doesn't read the answers and just lazily picks the 1st choice every time they randomly do surveys.
Taking all the other things into account, this is an excellent example on how to rig a survey. The only down side is it's very obvious and not subtle at all per the following:
3 of 5 answers support their position. So even if a bot was choosing answers at random, they would get the result they want.
Answers they want picked are always ordered 1st.
Survey wording is intentionally confusing and obfuscated so only someone who pays close attention will actually pick what they want. The end result is a tendency towards either randomness (which favours them per 1 above) or towards getting confused/frustrated with the survey because it requires mental effort and just picking the 1st answer to get it out of the way (which favours them per 2 above).
Keep in mind, there is a reason the Toronto Star is called the Red Star. Even among many leftists it is considered to be garbage. I could go on and on about why this newspaper is the lowest form of trash but I will end by saying that their articles read like an opinion sections (no argument, poorly written, tell you what they think even as it makes no sense, peak ultra-leftist echo chamber) and their opinion sections read like articles (usually contradict the point of the newspaper / are right leaning, are well written, provide arguments and evidence to backup their points and make sense).
They always do that on government and propaganda sites. Foodstamps app in Fla. asks you if you eat and buy food as a list with everyone you have in your household. Many people confused by that because children don't buy food...
voted for: No, they're using too much force on predominantly peaceful protesters.
Thank you for voting!
Yes, they've been clearing protesters without escalating the situation. 29.87% (831 votes)
No, they're using too much force on predominantly peaceful protesters. 28.9% (804 votes)
Yes, they've been doing what's necessary to get the capital under control. 24.55% (683 votes)
No, I think they should've used more force and cleared the city sooner. 16.1% (448 votes)
I'm not sure/none of the above. 0.58% (16 votes)
To be honest though "I'm not sure/none of the above." is a non-answer, so it's 3 out of 4 remaining choices against the protesters.
That’s how I answered as well. I’m glad I thoroughly read through all answer choices because it’s heavily one-sided apart from one answer.
10 hours later:
https://files.catbox.moe/0mlrx6.png
Done!
Now it’s flipped but still too close
Based on comments I’ve read under their different articles they appear to be left-leaning.
This is why I love .win
They can run psyops all day long. It’s no match for a group of pedes using meme magic and the power of community.
VOTED
you want my ansa, not one Protester should have been removed,.wether they picked them up nice and gently carriied to a safe spot some where and gently put them back down again, NO Protester should have been removed,..
Pretty sure these idiots left it to where you can vote as much as you want (just like the elections).
Done.
What kind of 'leading' poll is this? They forgot to ask -- "When did you stop raping your wife"?
Almost there, one question has to beat all 3.
This is a terribly made poll. This should be on a more linear scale, but as u/patriotic_legend pointed out, only 1 answer is in support of allowing the peaceful protests to continue, while the 3 answers are in favour of police interference to varying degrees, and 1 answer is the standard ‘don’t know’ option.
Also, it gives too much ‘narrative’ information in the answers, allowing for biases and confusion.
Been flipped!
Yes, this poll is bad. Even the one no question is designed to further the communist narrative. "Mostly peaceful?" That's how they described blm while a city block burned behind the reporter.
52.07 we are winning.
No, they're using too much force on predominantly peaceful protesters. 64.58% (6,049 votes)
Yes, they've been clearing protesters without escalating the situation. 14.83% (1,389 votes)
Yes, they've been doing what's necessary to get the capital under control. 11.69% (1,095 votes)
No, I think they should've used more force and cleared the city sooner. 8.37% (784 votes)
I'm not sure/none of the above. 0.53% (50 votes)
Total Votes: 9,367
7:45 pm PST
Done
Flipped!
Done!
Done!
You beautiful souls make me proud every day!
Have your say: Do you think police have used the right amount of force in clearing protesters in Ottawa?
No, they're using too much force on predominantly peaceful protesters. 51.36% (2,516 votes)
Yes, they've been clearing protesters without escalating the situation. 20.11% (985 votes)
Yes, they've been doing what's necessary to get the capital under control. 16.64% (815 votes)
No, I think they should've used more force and cleared the city sooner. 11.41% (559 votes)
I'm not sure/none of the above. 0.48% (24 votes)
Total Votes: 4,899
Have your say: Do you think police have used the right amount of force in clearing protesters in Ottawa? No, they're using too much force on predominantly peaceful protesters. 55.02% (3,393 votes)
Yes, they've been clearing protesters without escalating the situation. 18.63% (1,149 votes)
Yes, they've been doing what's necessary to get the capital under control. 15.18% (936 votes)
No, I think they should've used more force and cleared the city sooner. 10.62% (655 votes)
I'm not sure/none of the above. 0.55% (34 votes)
Total Votes: 6,167
Have your say: Do you think police have used the right amount of force in clearing protesters in Ottawa? No, they're using too much force on predominantly peaceful protesters. 62.16% (5,164 votes)
Yes, they've been clearing protesters without escalating the situation. 15.9% (1,321 votes)
Yes, they've been doing what's necessary to get the capital under control. 12.49% (1,038 votes)
No, I think they should've used more force and cleared the city sooner. 8.93% (742 votes)
I'm not sure/none of the above. 0.52% (43 votes)
Total Votes: 8,308
I laugh at these polls because these idiots are gonna do what they’re gonna do anyway. My job does these polls all the time and nothing changes.
Think of it this way, if the poll goes the direction the person wants it to, it empowers them and think they are doing the right job. If the poll goes the way they don’t want to, they blame external factors and continue to do what they want to do anyway…
They don’t care about your opinion they care about reaffirming their decisions
I voted the NO.
There should have been a spot to write in a response.
done and done and we need more peeds!
Wow all those choices all supporting the violence and one saying it was too much.
Toronto star how to say you're biased towards the left without saying you're biased towards the left.
The real NO is over 58%, you can vote more than once... Just come back to the thread and reclick the poll link...
Poll Flipped.
Done. Up to 28.98% now. Less than a point down from #1 spot.
I'm doing my part!
Voted! It’s looking good with the one real answer - too much force.