I saw a video where a guy put a black-light on a test just like this one and you could see what the test results would be before running the test. Their narrative is done.
It's hard to evaluate this. There's no explanation of what we're seeing.
Which test are they showing? Which brand and model of test?
Are the 3 sticks intended to show 3 of the same at-home test or 3 different types?
Did he validate them by having a person who is known to be COVID negative use the tests and check to see if the outcomes matched the black light "results"?
How were the tests handled from the time they were taken out of the box to when they appeared on film? Were they "doctored" in some way?
At the very least, I'd like to see that last part, because it's quite possible that the chemical indicator they use to show a positive test is active in the UV spectrum. That's not uncommon for chemicals to be clear in the visible spectrum, but "visible" in the infrared or UV spectra.
With just these 25 seconds, it's impossible to know what's actually going on with what we're seeing. After watching 2 weeks of blatant war propaganda with fake videos, I've grown quite skeptical of things which can't be verified in some way as authentic.
I wish you had performed this experiment because I agree with every point that you made. However, I think this merits further examination because whatever is going on, the test strip results do appear to be fluorescent under UV. It's a shame they didn't present a better case.
If this is an antigen test, it's probably designed to detect the spike protein since that's the prominent feature on the outside of the viral particle. All this test would do is tell you if it comes into contact with that spike protein or not. There's a threshold to any of these tests regarding the amount of spike protein needed to trigger a positive result, but if this is what I think it is, it's reasonably sensitive. The goal of the test is to catch an infection early and prompt the user to get to the doctor for a PCR test which would be diagnostic. Serology tests aren't diagnostic.
Here's where error comes into play. We have a very sensitive test and a virus that's now ubiquitous in our environment. It's aerosolized, so it's everywhere. We know the viral particle can live on surfaces for extended periods of time. The pear itself could have had actual viral particles on it when you tested it, so when you did the test, it flagged positive.
While that might seem unreasonable, consider that the PCR test is also incredibly sensitive, and easily contaminated. IIRC correctly, it was the President of Tanzania (or perhaps a different African country) who was suspicious about COVID and sent 4 samples to the CDC including swabs from a papaya and from a healthy goat. They came back positive - something easily explained by contamination.
Since you seem interested in trying some more tests, a few questions?
Were the pear and knife washed with soap and water before you cut into the pear to do your test? We'd want to avoid contamination with any surface.
Which specific brand of test are you using?
Instead of testing a weak acid (ie fruit juice), try testing something basic like a bar of soap or a solution of baking soda in water. Most of these tests are pH-sensitive which is why you have to use buffer solutions they often include with the test kit.
It's not contamination. The whole thing is a fraud. Do you know there has never been a complete live virus isolated (defined: purified. Virologists redefined that term to mean a process of poisoning cells) and characterized and proven to be the cause of a specific disease? The PCR method is not diagnostic, it just amplifies any DNA fragments you tell it to look for. Fragments being the key word. It doesn't look for a full genome. If it did, how would it detect the full genetic sequence which is encapsulated in a protein shell and twisted in a double helix?
These tests are based on chemical reactions, probably acidity testing, so it stands to reason that compounds other than those found in the sinuses would produce weird false positives.
The tests come with pretty clear instructions about how to avoid contamination. Sure, if you're snorkeling up pears you're probably going to throw it off. Would you expect something different? These are chemical tests that use compounds to mark covid antigens or parts of covid itself so they will be picked up on the chemically treated material. They are based on the narrow chemical characteristics of a healthy sinus that does not contain pears.
Cut it out with the name calling. He has a valid point.
Do YOU understand the chemistry involved with these tests?
I don't, but I have enough sense to understand that testing things the test wasn't designed for just MAY cause the test to malfunction. Why is is so hard to consider that pH or Alkalinity may play a part in how the test works.
That said, the tests aren't designed for "Covid" testing either, so it's all BS.
It's not. The PCR fraud is the centerpiece of the scamdemic. There is no scientific merit to the tests at all. Not even a little bit. There has never been any virus isolated in order to develop a test from. They are all based on computer models, and what it picks up are genetic fragments, not a whole genome, let alone a complete virus. So it only detects dead material, which could come from anywhere. A positive result means absolutely nothing.
Wait.... so they're spreading coronavirus using pears?
Son of a bitch. These people are ruthless.
I saw a video where a guy put a black-light on a test just like this one and you could see what the test results would be before running the test. Their narrative is done.
Can you give us a link?
Sorry, I was surfin with the alien just checking out what was going on.
I found it fren... https://rumble.com/vx9zzw-covid-tests-are-all-fraudulent-predetermined-results-built-in-tests.html
This may be worth a post of it's own.
It's hard to evaluate this. There's no explanation of what we're seeing.
At the very least, I'd like to see that last part, because it's quite possible that the chemical indicator they use to show a positive test is active in the UV spectrum. That's not uncommon for chemicals to be clear in the visible spectrum, but "visible" in the infrared or UV spectra.
With just these 25 seconds, it's impossible to know what's actually going on with what we're seeing. After watching 2 weeks of blatant war propaganda with fake videos, I've grown quite skeptical of things which can't be verified in some way as authentic.
I wish you had performed this experiment because I agree with every point that you made. However, I think this merits further examination because whatever is going on, the test strip results do appear to be fluorescent under UV. It's a shame they didn't present a better case.
Pregnancy tests do this also. It's the chemicals on the pre-treated strip that are chemical active.
That’s crazy but not too surprised. Wonder if anyone has tried this? Just did a quick internet search and found nothing.
Unbelievable! lmao
Memes incoming...
I guess the Gain of Function research paid off! It can now be transmitted to fruits too 😂
Fruits are already responsible for spreading a deadly virus. Fauci was involved with that one too, back in the 80's.
Obviously, the pear deserved it because it wasn't wearing a mask and wasn't properly vaccinated.
Awesome.
Everybody should be doing this stick a little pear in your nose go into your work and test positive pretty soon they won’t have you test anymore.
If this is an antigen test, it's probably designed to detect the spike protein since that's the prominent feature on the outside of the viral particle. All this test would do is tell you if it comes into contact with that spike protein or not. There's a threshold to any of these tests regarding the amount of spike protein needed to trigger a positive result, but if this is what I think it is, it's reasonably sensitive. The goal of the test is to catch an infection early and prompt the user to get to the doctor for a PCR test which would be diagnostic. Serology tests aren't diagnostic.
Here's where error comes into play. We have a very sensitive test and a virus that's now ubiquitous in our environment. It's aerosolized, so it's everywhere. We know the viral particle can live on surfaces for extended periods of time. The pear itself could have had actual viral particles on it when you tested it, so when you did the test, it flagged positive.
While that might seem unreasonable, consider that the PCR test is also incredibly sensitive, and easily contaminated. IIRC correctly, it was the President of Tanzania (or perhaps a different African country) who was suspicious about COVID and sent 4 samples to the CDC including swabs from a papaya and from a healthy goat. They came back positive - something easily explained by contamination.
Since you seem interested in trying some more tests, a few questions?
It's not contamination. The whole thing is a fraud. Do you know there has never been a complete live virus isolated (defined: purified. Virologists redefined that term to mean a process of poisoning cells) and characterized and proven to be the cause of a specific disease? The PCR method is not diagnostic, it just amplifies any DNA fragments you tell it to look for. Fragments being the key word. It doesn't look for a full genome. If it did, how would it detect the full genetic sequence which is encapsulated in a protein shell and twisted in a double helix?
live video testing needed for the normies
I expect all of them to test + I should have grabbed a few tests from my mailman when he was delivering them. I wanted to test a few things myself.
Good work testing the pear!
Dont forget...the 'new improved' virus coming to get us, already in chyna.
Where was this post 2 years ago? Oh Yeah. they Killed John that tested the goat and Papaya.
These tests are based on chemical reactions, probably acidity testing, so it stands to reason that compounds other than those found in the sinuses would produce weird false positives.
The tests come with pretty clear instructions about how to avoid contamination. Sure, if you're snorkeling up pears you're probably going to throw it off. Would you expect something different? These are chemical tests that use compounds to mark covid antigens or parts of covid itself so they will be picked up on the chemically treated material. They are based on the narrow chemical characteristics of a healthy sinus that does not contain pears.
Cut it out with the name calling. He has a valid point.
Do YOU understand the chemistry involved with these tests? I don't, but I have enough sense to understand that testing things the test wasn't designed for just MAY cause the test to malfunction. Why is is so hard to consider that pH or Alkalinity may play a part in how the test works.
That said, the tests aren't designed for "Covid" testing either, so it's all BS.
It's not. The PCR fraud is the centerpiece of the scamdemic. There is no scientific merit to the tests at all. Not even a little bit. There has never been any virus isolated in order to develop a test from. They are all based on computer models, and what it picks up are genetic fragments, not a whole genome, let alone a complete virus. So it only detects dead material, which could come from anywhere. A positive result means absolutely nothing.
Can you open these up and split them into strips with a razor for multiple tests???
Order more free ones from the government. No one else is!
Just watched another video here (https://greatawakening.win/p/142BJfkJMN/it-appears-that-the-results-of-s/c/) that showed the test under black light having pre-determined results... check that too!
It always the leads to the juice…