The ideology is making a successful push due to lack of confidence and respect for our leadership.
(media.greatawakening.win)
🤡 MSM Conspiracy Theory 🤡
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (246)
sorted by:
Flat earthers dont like to test their theories. I can come up with math checks and simple tests to support globe model. Flat earthers cant do the same. In that way they dont really fit in here. Theyre more like the sheep we see everyday but instead of believing everything the government says, they believe the opposite. That makes them only slightly more correct than the sheep overall.
Not saying I'm a flat earther but have seen several instances where math supports flat earth.
But my question to you is, if the perpetrators of round earth conceived said concept, would they not also create the means of supporting it as well?
Kind of pointless to push an earth model only to have it debunked by some basic math/calculations.
I'm not a flat earther, nor a round earther, but at this point, anything and everything is up in the air.
Not just math. Simple logic and tests.
Name a test that you or I can do that proves flat earth?
Q said Earth isn't flat. Q said disinformation is necessary. Therefore Earth is flat. cHeCKmAte dOrKs
(just kidding. I find flat Earthers amusing......)
Amusing until they try to tie FE to the Bible. They cherry pick a couple verses, take things out of context, or take things literally that were meant symbolically or metaphorically. It just makes christians look bad, but maybe thats their goal.
Sun and moon the same size... coincidence? Perfect size ratios to account for their different distances? Or perhaps - same size and both are the same distance - and within the firmament?
Except then lunar eclipses dont make sense. Next one on May 15th. Check it out!
Perspective again - the sun is much farther away than the moon. Sun approximately 93 million miles; moon approximately a quarter million miles.
The Danyang-Kunshan Grand Bridge in China is the longest bridge on earth at 102.4 miles long.
It should have a 6,990.50ft spherical drop from one end to the other to compensate for the supposed curvature.
But, it doesn't....
Can you prove that it doesnt?
Take a ball, poor water on it. Observe the effects.
Take a box, poor water in it. Observe the effects
Aside from changing it's properties in frozen form, water doesn't change it's properties when scaling up.
Water is somewhat heavy, if gravity were keeping it stuck to a globe, how do waves and lulls form? How do we so easily jump up from the surface?
Granted, that doesn't prove flat earth, but many factors when looked at with even a little skepticism can be seen as doubtful.
Regardless, flat or round, God's made a wonderfully mysterious home for us.
“Take a ball, poor water on it. Observe the effects”
So youre saying that because you cant see the effect of gravity between small objects it doesnt exist? What about large objects like the earth and moon? Scale is important to understand.
You think water finds its level when really water is attracted to the center of mass of the nearest largest object (the earth).
Haha. Water absolutely has properties that are only apparent at certain scales. Like a bead of water on a blade of grass or the surface that surrounds a bubble in a level (definitely not flat).
“Granted, that doesn't prove flat earth”
“Water is somewhat heavy, if gravity were keeping it stuck to a globe, how do waves form and lulls form? How do we so easily jump up from the surface”
So for gravity to exist, all other forces must cease to exist? You would expect a perfectly round sphere with no blemishes?
How about this test. A globe model would predict that the sun (and stars) would move 15 degrees every hour. Lets map it out. We all own a protractor, we can do this. A local sun moving over a disc would not do this.
If the Sun is a flying saucer pot light why does it always maintain its circular shape even during the sunset when it should look like in ellipse flying over the ocean really far away? Why does it look like a ball where our perspective to it is being cut off by the shape of the planet as it rotates?
This is an example of a question where you have to do mental gymnastics and hold cognitive dissonance ideas in your head to make this work in a flat Earth world.
The sun cannot be a flying projector light and look like it does and have sunsets. This is not a suggestion, it's an engineering reality.
Like FFS, just model it in 3D and look at what it looks like when the Sun goes around. The 3D model replication can be done with a globe model. It absolutely 100% cannot be done with a disc, it does not look like reality when you 3D model and explore the world as a disc.
The Flat Earther would most likely respond by saying the Sun is moving over the Dome (Firmament) above the Earth. This would make the disk appear more round throughout it's trajectory across the sky.
Because the 3D modeling companies are in on it. ;). Haha
It's like these people never took a projector light and pointed it down at a surface and ask themselves what does looking up at that like light look like with the scales that I've used in my model.
Even if they don't know 3D programming all they have to do is take a pot light and a desk and put the pot light close to the desk so that it lights up half of it had to go and then move it around and look at the shape of the light changing as it moves further away from you and closer.
It's like somebody suggested that it was a projector and all of the flat earthers went oh okay and then nobody ever bothered to think about what it would actually look like if it was a projector.
But seriously though like f*** this would be one of the easiest things to set up as a scene in blender. Literally you put down a flat disk and a projector light source set to move on a circular path, then set the camera to be on the disk pointed at the projector.
It literally would have taken them like an afternoon to test it in the physical world and like probably 15 minutes if they knew what they were doing on the computer.
No no no you don't get it, math is rigged to support round earth maaaaaaaannn
But seriously, you can observe for yourselves. I myself have seen other constellations that cannot be seen from the US.
https://www.livescience.com/60544-ways-to-prove-earth-is-round.html
Exactly this.
Actually, you're wrong about testing theories. There is more evidence and proof earth is flat than round. There is zero proof the earth is round. People in this board experience extreme cognitive dissonance when even thinking about talking to "one of those flat earthers." "Take that to conspiracies." I'm not going to provide any answers to people who think the earth is round. People can do their own research. Globe earthers don't do any research. They just believe NASA and TV.
All you said was meaningless words with no proof to back up your claims.
You can literally test these out yourself:
https://www.livescience.com/60544-ways-to-prove-earth-is-round.html
Is this real or fake? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PBJUogyCNw
Are you actually serious or purposefully retarded?
No matter how many times you spam this link, it backs up nothing other than the propaganda to drive the narrative.
Give me a test that youve done to prove it. Watching videos isnt considered research btw.
Prove it wrong with facts and logic. Your use of buzzwords makes you sound like the average Twatter user- okay, not so much anymore. Point is you haven't brought any counter evidence. At this point I'll just assume you to be another fed boi faggot attempting to gaslight.
There was a good lecture (I have to find it!) by some physicist that states the mathematical models for a heliocentric and geocentric earth can be proven correct. The math is there.
Not FE related.
Youre saying that math exists that shows the sun could revolve around that earth?
Yeap. The point of the lecture was you could model BOTH and it would work.
You got a link or just confirmation bias text blurbs?
The force of gravity doesnt work like that. Thats like saying Jupiter orbits around one of its moons.
Geocentric means everything orbits around the earth. How the planets work in that model I have no idea, again I’ll have to look for the link … then one can dig further if interested.
It’s odd how massive an allergic reaction people have when the ‘standard’ is questioned, or other potentialities might exist. To me that’s a sign of a massive psyop or campaign designed to discredit discourse etc.
Very similar to how Tesla was discredited and pushed aside.
I think there is actual research that gets done here. And then theres the flat earth crowd that is more concerned with believing the opposite of what theyve been told than actually finding the truth.
Here you go. Lots of resources in there to dig further. The theory and calculations are to do with the fixed point of the universe… the modes would work if the center was the Earth or some far, far, distant singular point in the universe etc.
https://rumble.com/vxt1pd-how-the-geocentric-universe-works-with-modern-physics.html
Ok so the video boils down to motion is relative. I get that. There may not be absolute location or therefore absolute motion, I tend to think of the center of all mass being absolute center and everything also works relative to the inertial reference frame you are in. When were talking about motion of the solar system, it seems to make much more sense to describe the sun as the center even if the true center of mass of the solar system doesnt line up perfectly with the center of mass of the sun.
I havent gotten to the point where they explain how the stars being light years away could rotate around the earth everyday. That would mean theyre traveling much faster than the speed of light.