It’s actually mathematically impossible for his post NOT to align with any Q posts. If he posted at 20:38, it would be with Q post #2038. If he posted at 14:39, it would be with Q post #1439.
It’s a disservice to even call it a coincidence. It’s just a mathematical guarantee that no matter when he posts, there is a Q post that aligns.
I don’t understand why is is a big deal…or even a small deal
I dont see how the Q+ ties to the message about the wedding.
Surely there are no coincidences. But that does not.mean everything is a proof. If this followed normal habbenings, would it mean Where we go one, we go all....just happens to be a wedding at Mar-a-Lago?
This isn't a delta. It's a timestamp that you can match with a Q post, taking only the hour and minutes into consideration. 20:39. Post 2039 with Q+ signature.
That is the coincidence. It could be something, it could be nothing. It's a data point to consider.
Now if you want even more solid coincidences you can find a lot. This is how Q proved Trump was working with Q and vice versa.
I really don’t get it. At this point literally every possible time will match with a Q post. No matter when trump posts, there is a Q post with a number. How are they significant? Why do these two posts align?
The same sauce that claims Q+ = Trump. It's only an opinion; a guess; a theory that was posited by some stranger on the internet. How on earth so many people came to believe that qualifies as a fact is beyond me.
Late summer 2018 If I recall correctly. Someone who called themselves VIP Anon posted about getting a backstage pass to see President Trump. Long story short, He received a photo of himself and Trump at that meeting and on the back it was signed (((+))).
Late summer 2018 If I recall correctly. Someone who called themselves VIP Anon posted about getting a backstage pass to see President Trump. Long story short, He received a photo of himself and Trump at that meeting and on the back it was signed (((+)))
Or in other words, some dude on the internet claimed himself to be a "VIP" anon, got a picture of Trump, and alleged that he witnessed Trump do something totally bizarre, and unprecedented with his (alleged) picture by drawing (((+))) on the back, and insisted the drawing was a "signature" for the president of the USA.
And then, people on the internet somehow deduced that an alleged presidential drawing of (((+))) on the back of a picture is the same thing as a signature on a Q post that looks like Q+ thus, verifying that the president of the USA was indeed typing mysterious messages to the public on 8chan forums.
This kind of reasoning is called "mental gymnastics," not proof. But people are welcome to believe whatever they want, and in this case, they may even be correct. But I'm gonna shoot this straight, and say that Q+ is not a super secret coded signature for Donald Trump.
True. I recall seeing the evidence supporting the notion that Q+ is DJT, and it is always flimsy, subjective, and stretched beyond reason. I simply do not buy into that theory. Nor do I care much about who, or what Q+ actually is, because I have no interest in trying to doxx Q.
No, the photo was of VIP Anon AND Trump backstage at one of his rallies. He showed the VIP backstage pass and then videoed himself opening the package containing said photo, showing it had not been opened, official postmark and address from the Whitehouse etc.
What you say could be true. How do you know? You are just some dude on the internet who believes otherwise and therefore you should be believed? You have done no research to the contrary, you only disbelieve... because.
...because of the obvious: A drawing of "(((+)))" is not the same thing as a digital signature of "Q+" It is a stretch to assume that those two images are directly related, (oh my god, they both show a + symbol!) proof of the extraordinary claim that it means Donald J. Trump, president of the USA, is Q+, and posts cryptic messages on a chan forum. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proofs.
We have three things issued at 1:29 aka Q-watch time:
IG report
Durham rebuttal
Barr rebuttal
We have confirmation that there are no coincidences.
So that means one of three things:
Horowitz, Durham and Barr are all in communication with Q
OR
Horowitz, Durham and Barr were specifically directed by Q+ to issue their reports/rebuttals at precisely 1:29 PM ("Why, POTUS?" "You'll find out. Just do it.")
OR
It’s actually mathematically impossible for his post NOT to align with any Q posts. If he posted at 20:38, it would be with Q post #2038. If he posted at 14:39, it would be with Q post #1439.
It’s a disservice to even call it a coincidence. It’s just a mathematical guarantee that no matter when he posts, there is a Q post that aligns.
I don’t understand why is is a big deal…or even a small deal
You don't understand what the coincidence is. It's not JUST THE TIME STAMP. It's the message.
DO you know what Q+ means?
I dont see how the Q+ ties to the message about the wedding.
Surely there are no coincidences. But that does not.mean everything is a proof. If this followed normal habbenings, would it mean Where we go one, we go all....just happens to be a wedding at Mar-a-Lago?
The wedding has nothing to do with it. It's Trump pointing to a certain message based on the timestamp. How many posts have Q+ in it?
The Time Stamps do NOT match. This is not how the Delta proofs work.
This is just someone matching random numbers and hoping for Hopium.
Not saying that Trump isn't Q+ - but not saying that he is either.
This isn't a delta. It's a timestamp that you can match with a Q post, taking only the hour and minutes into consideration. 20:39. Post 2039 with Q+ signature.
That is the coincidence. It could be something, it could be nothing. It's a data point to consider.
Now if you want even more solid coincidences you can find a lot. This is how Q proved Trump was working with Q and vice versa.
Are you sure you understand how the proofs do/do not work?
Also this is a coincidence, not a proof. Proofs are quite different.
Its no coincidence that someome pulled a Trump Truth and matched the timestamp to a Q+ post.
I guess thats my thought. Any given post timestamp could align to a Q post. Does not mean there is anything to glean from it.
Of course, the message in the post could be of note.
Come to think of it. What is the 'TT11' at the top of the post for? I have no idea and havent found an answer as of yet.
Correct. The Q post with Q+ makes it a coincidence since Trump posted it and it matches with a Q post signed Q+ (trump).
TT11 comes from qagg.news. I am assuming it means Trump Truth Number 11. His 11th post on Truth Social.
I really don’t get it. At this point literally every possible time will match with a Q post. No matter when trump posts, there is a Q post with a number. How are they significant? Why do these two posts align?
Anyone care to explain?
I guess the significance is specifically it matching a "Q+" post as those supposedly come from Trump himself
You must be new to Q bro.
How many posts have Q+ in it? Q+ implies TRUMP.
https://qagg.news/?q=q%2B
I count 33 times that drops are signed with Q+. Ummm, FUCK. I hope he’s trolling.
I'm not
I mean, I hope Trump is trolling…. 33, seriously?
looks like he only had 5 seconds to spare......
Trump is not Q+. You can take that info. to the bank.
Trump is Q+. You can take that to the bank. 👍
Yup
Plvs vltra
👍 This.
Plus Plus Plus!
A group of 17+1, thats me!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkL5j_huCPc&t=437s
I love this one.......
(((+)))
I've actually thought he may not be for awhile...sauce?
The same sauce that claims Q+ = Trump. It's only an opinion; a guess; a theory that was posited by some stranger on the internet. How on earth so many people came to believe that qualifies as a fact is beyond me.
Late summer 2018 If I recall correctly. Someone who called themselves VIP Anon posted about getting a backstage pass to see President Trump. Long story short, He received a photo of himself and Trump at that meeting and on the back it was signed (((+))).
Or in other words, some dude on the internet claimed himself to be a "VIP" anon, got a picture of Trump, and alleged that he witnessed Trump do something totally bizarre, and unprecedented with his (alleged) picture by drawing (((+))) on the back, and insisted the drawing was a "signature" for the president of the USA.
And then, people on the internet somehow deduced that an alleged presidential drawing of (((+))) on the back of a picture is the same thing as a signature on a Q post that looks like Q+ thus, verifying that the president of the USA was indeed typing mysterious messages to the public on 8chan forums.
This kind of reasoning is called "mental gymnastics," not proof. But people are welcome to believe whatever they want, and in this case, they may even be correct. But I'm gonna shoot this straight, and say that Q+ is not a super secret coded signature for Donald Trump.
I would do some research, and find the coincidences surrounding Trump and Q+.
Nothing we say is going to convince you, you have to find what's evident to you.
True. I recall seeing the evidence supporting the notion that Q+ is DJT, and it is always flimsy, subjective, and stretched beyond reason. I simply do not buy into that theory. Nor do I care much about who, or what Q+ actually is, because I have no interest in trying to doxx Q.
I think it's strange that you have no interest in figuring it out, but you have interest in dissuading others.
You have the biggest comments in this thread over it.
I'm not here to figure you out, but this contradiction sticks out like a sore thumb to me.
I get where you are TRYING to come from but you are leaving out key elements of the story........you may want to review the VIP anon situation.
No, the photo was of VIP Anon AND Trump backstage at one of his rallies. He showed the VIP backstage pass and then videoed himself opening the package containing said photo, showing it had not been opened, official postmark and address from the Whitehouse etc.
What you say could be true. How do you know? You are just some dude on the internet who believes otherwise and therefore you should be believed? You have done no research to the contrary, you only disbelieve... because.
...because of the obvious: A drawing of "(((+)))" is not the same thing as a digital signature of "Q+" It is a stretch to assume that those two images are directly related, (oh my god, they both show a + symbol!) proof of the extraordinary claim that it means Donald J. Trump, president of the USA, is Q+, and posts cryptic messages on a chan forum. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proofs.
So, you have not researched this yourself.
OH?
This made me believe that Q+ is Trump:
From post 3689
We have three things issued at 1:29 aka Q-watch time:
We have confirmation that there are no coincidences. So that means one of three things:
Horowitz, Durham and Barr are all in communication with Q OR
Horowitz, Durham and Barr were specifically directed by Q+ to issue their reports/rebuttals at precisely 1:29 PM ("Why, POTUS?" "You'll find out. Just do it.") OR
Some combination of the above.
Is he telling us to attack?
Nope, this isn't, he's signaling who he is again.
Personally, I like to read Q+ in Trump's voice.
How do you see the full time on a post in Truth Social? I can't find a setting that shows it.
Good question! It's from Qagg. I'm using the browser version.
Oh, I see. Thanks for the information!
When we play these games and just pick SOME of the #'s to match up, how do you know you shouldn't have gone to post # 3954? Or # 0395?
Which one's are signed Q+?
Fyi - There is no post for 0395. (I have to assume you didn't check? 😕)
https://qalerts.app/