Israel for last. Make of this what you will.
(www.reuters.com)
Comments (24)
sorted by:
Pravda - his grandma got knocked up by a Roth.
Sorry deleted thinking irrelevant. This is not my area. Perhaps this helps, perhaps not.
https://files.catbox.moe/724f1g.jpg
As I mentioned elsewhere in this thread, I believe this claim is bogus for the following reasons:
Wealthy Jewish families, especially aristocrats, kept bloodlines...and inheritances..."in the family," so to speak. So, relationships were between cousins, et al. The historical claim, here, is that a Rothschild had an illicit affair with a maid, then, years later, tracked her down, and bestowed a massive fortune onto the child. Really?
If such an affair and a child occurred, the obvious reaction would be to deny it happened, so that there would NOT be any claim against the family fortune. There were no DNA tests, etc., and no other way to prove it even if it were true.
Adolph Hitler would have been the grandchild. Again, knowing how these families work, why would a Rothschild care to have influence over an illegitimate son...let alone a grandchild?
I don't know what the possible psyop could be behind this. I can't think of who might benefit from making such a claim. A little logic applied to questions such as this provides at least a helpful amount of perspective.
I too find it a stretch, but I have not put in the time on this topic. Thanks for the input.
Watch yourself, goyim!
You know why I like this little bit here?
When they say 'What sort of nazification is this if we are Jews', well I think that Hitler also had Jewish origins, so it means nothing," Lavrov said, speaking through an Italian interpreter.
Because it can also mean Hitler was created by the Jews, and may not allude to his ancestry.
Good point
Khazarian Mafia history coming to the forefront .../!
For what it's worth, I have dug as deep as is possible on the web trying to verify this claim...that Hitler had Jewish roots...and it's my conclusion that it is without merit.
I'm a bit confused by this. Is this not a moderately well known and established historical fact? "Officially" at least. It's one of those many inconsistencies with "historical facts" that leads to vast head scratching by anyone willing to look into it.
My guess? The very beginning of waking people up to the historical disinfo. Maybe? Sure this will be "Russian propaganda" but... it puts the idea out there to the masses...
I've heard that as well, that Hitler may have had some Jewish ancestry.
When will we stop giving them billions?
Grandson.
This is a tricky topic because the red shields aren't real Jews. They only claim to be for protections like this article.
Who or what are "real Jews?" Why don't these mythical "real Jews" separate themselves from the Khazars? It's the same thing with the saracens. Why don't all those "peaceful muslims" speak out against the violence perpetrated by the devout muslims?
Its always been ((them)). The truth is bubbling to the service.
Hitler had a Rothschild relative. So, yeah, some Jewish blood.
This whole jewish thing has been made to always be a "sticky wicket," and there is a reason for it. Personally, I think it has its foundation in the Khazarian Mafia.