I’ve been trying to tie up some loose ends in my understanding of certain things lately. The amazing people on GAW always have the answers!
Comments (62)
sorted by:
You tell me if all these are faked
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hApRZ_7v2A&t=0s
No, it wasn't faked.
Yes. I’ve seen the footage without a plane complete with explosion.
would like to see as well, please share link
I've seen as well but I think the plane actually hit. Might have been poor quality as to why u didn't see the plane from the angle this guy's talking about
If its the shot im thinking of then I agree.....the plane seems to dissappear for a few frames before impact but I think its lighting and or quality issue .....
Yeah I think we are thinking of the same clip.
It not a fucking lighting issue. Something as big as a plane doesn’t just fucking disappear.
Want something else to bake your noodle? If you are old enough to remember the Kennedy assassination, or at least early footage from the 80s to early 00s, think back to his car. How many rows of seats? I vividly remember 2 rows with 4 people. Now go look it up. Fucking 3 rows with 6 occupants in the car.
Not sure if we had a timeline shift with Mandela effect or if the glowies reworked new video, but it is totally fucking different.
Go to rumble and search “no planes 9/11.” Study the videos and eyewitness accounts for hours then get back with me.
This isn’t the video I originally saw, but it’s clips of some of the footage. https://rumble.com/vuegtm-raw-proof-no-plane-hit-the-second-tower-on-911-propaganda-cgi-plane.
This isn’t it either, but…. https://rumble.com/vn8o3x-nine-eleven-911-no-plane-proofs-documentary-by-hibbeler-productions.
Go to rumble and search “no planes” or “no planes 9/11.”
https://rumble.com/vikbp3-tower-explodes-without-a-plane.-video-from-a-passing-car...html
Thanks for links
My friend was there and swears she saw a plane.
All of the eye-witness video I've seen, everyone says "plane" but no one says "passenger plane" or "commercial airliner". They ALL say just "plane".
It could be a drone and still fit the description of "plane" but a "commercial airliner" isn't an accurate description for a drone. wasn't 9/11 before drones were really heavily in use? The military used drone aircraft in target practice for example, but I don't think we saw the Predator in full time use yet.
When a news crew in LA went to LAX to potentially interview grieving relatives who were waiting at the gate, they discovered no one waiting at the gates. When airport security realized there were reporters gathering (waiting for people who were never going to show up because there were no passengers??), they cited some security emergency and cleared out the terminal. (it's so old I can't find the sauce, but it's out there)
I am confused. Are you saying (3rd paragraph) that a plane was at the terminal but no passengers?
My friend was probably scared shitless as she was running and all covered in dust from the buildings collapsing. Crazy.
One or more of the LA bound flights had no one waiting at the gate for passengers.
A local news crew thought it would be a good story to interview people waiting to receive their loved ones or to hear more news and there was no one to interview.
Between Flight 11 (81 passengers) and Flight 175 (65 passengers) there should have been someone there to pickup a passenger but there was no one.
When airport security realized there were news crews showing up and waiting around, they called some kind of security threat/lockdown and closed/evacuated the terminal.
That parts not critical. Does it matter if there were planes, or something else, or nothing at all?
Watching the buildings fall, and then looking at the official story, is enough to know it was all a lie.
YES it was ,, I have questions , but there is So many horrific monstrous murderous events that they have done I try not to get hung up on all the details! As I have time I go back over events and clear up a question or two ,, all I know is they planned it and pulled it off and many people still don't know Bush and the other demons involved were in on it from the conception ! Tragic !
Stop trying to discredit us, glowie. Think for just one moment what it would have taken to wire those buildings up with demolition charges. Opening walls up to get to steel columns, wires running everywhere, you people are lost.
into the twin towers....that is just dumb
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hApRZ_7v2A&t=0s
Play them at .25 speed and watch the “plane” disappear into the building with not so much as a broken window until the explosion. Odd.
Agree , how does the plan disappear into the building ? Also helicopters flying around ,second plane goes right by and has anyone heard radio transmission from the chopper ?
I had no clue about 9/11 until I visited here. What an eye-opener. Building 7 was what really ran it home for me. But watching the plane melt into the building is something. No one yells or screams “another plane!!” is something. The oh sh:t$ don’t start until the explosion. The video trying to prove simply solidifies trickery to me.
Im not seeing anything like that from any of the angles where we can watch the impact from that side of the building....its there a specific one of the 50 that stands out to you?
Yes, start at 2.07. The guy doesn’t even look up until the explosion as if the sound of the engines wasn’t a thing.
I dont get where you are coming from , what EXACTLY is your point?
I said I didnt see the phenomenon that you described and asked for example then you pointed me to 207, a clip with no sound........
As far as the guys reaction, I dont see any problems there,
Believe what you want. I was just pointing out the plane melting into the building with not a broken window.
There is a ton of visual damage being done on impact pal, not sure what you are looking at....
Possibly not at crazy as you think.
There was one home video filmed quite close in that makes me think this might not be "dumb". The reason is that there is no doppler shift noise from an approaching jet on the home video. You can hear the explosion very clearly, and at the distance he was filming, the whine of a jet engine at power should have been at least as loud as a lawn mower. Sadly the camera was not focused on the exact impact point, and the camera was pointed down just before impact and jerked up at the moment the explosion occurred. It was impossible to see if there was a plane there seconds before due to the fireball.
But, here is the takeaway, there was no sound before the explosion. Even without knowing the absolute volume, a relative doppler shift should have been very detectable. A hologram could have mimicked the plane hitting the towers (I don't know how they could make a hologram like that...but my lack of knowledge does not mean it is dumb), but the hologram would not have been able to duplicate the sound of an engine. It would be quiet. And that is exactly what was observed on that video.
Again, not saying it was a hologram. But calling it "dumb" is jumping to a conclusion not necessarily supported by all the data.
Like I said DUMB....there are plenty of videos with sound
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hApRZ_7v2A
There were exactly 2 videos in there that were close enough to record a jet engine sound, and neither was close enough to detect a doppler shift of the engine coming towards it. Given that this was a well planned operation, I am not convinced that it can be conclusively ruled out that these 2 (only 2) videos had sound edited in afterwards before being released to the public.
You do not have to believe the theory. I am not saying it is true. But calling it "dumb" is jumping to a conclusion absolutely not supported by all the available data. Certainly not by the video clip you post above. The theory may be wrong, but not dumb.
Okay then how about Ridiculous......
First, when you are doing research such as this, collect all videos you can find that shows the planes hitting the towers. Only when you have the videos can you actually try and theorise what really happened.
All of the videos from people on the ground were doctored. False flag. Glowies and crisis actors. Same with the footage you see from the networks. However, some of the networks got sloppy and if you watch closely the CGI shit really falls apart upon close inspection. Airplane noses jut out of the other side of a tower, wings disappear behind buildings many blocks away, and other impossibilities.
Same for the pentagon. No passenger planes hit anything that day. There were digs on the planes that were allegedly used that showed them still in service years later.
I watched one video that broke down some odd shaped projectile that could be seen because a news helicopter wandered out of its intended area. It reminded me a little of the tech in the Q drops associated with the skunk bay missile launch. Something hit the towers, but it wasn’t planes.
So they created 50+ fake videos from all kinds of varying angles with crisis actors included in many for the tower BUT didnt even bother to make 1 for the Pentagon..,,,,
Yes, just think about how long 9/11 symbolism had been used in movies. The Matrix had it in 99. Back to the future in 85. Probably others I’m missing. This was a red letter day for these sick fucks and they planned on doing it up right.
The pentagon was an afterthought. After they got caught funneling trillions they decided to just fire bomb the responsible naval offices where the evidence was stored.
I think you underestimate just how far this group is willing to go in order to usher in the new world order.
So where is that video with no plane and an explosion , still wating to see it
Scrubbed dude. You are seeing scraps today. Believe me or not, but shit you could find 10 years ago in multiple places is now pretty much nonexistent if you are just searching YouTube. Google has been throttled into a useless, liberal pile of shit. Google “white American family” and tell me how that goes. Your 9/11 truther days should have started before the ministry of truth took over.
Yep most of it’s very scrubbed.
imho missiles/drones dressed to look like planes to have turned as quickly as they did and have hit so accurately where the "Israeli art students" planted all of the charges in the towers
For me when I saw the Radar trace of the aircraft prior to flying onto their targets, and saw each one meet up over the same airspace before then turning and heading out, made me think very much about their previous "Operation Northwood" plan to use drone aircraft?
When you study the official narrative, some of the speeds indicated or tight turns are simply impossible for the regular aircraft to do. You cannot (not even in a dive because of pesky things like wing flutter and other aerodynamic factors) have a greater airspeed at near to sea level than the engines can physically output, by a LONG way!
You cannot take aircraft like this way above the VMO (velocity max operating) envelope and expect the aircraft to not rip itself apart, let alone be piloted by people that had best a struggle to even land a Cessna!
The story surrounding Betty Ong is also very interesting. She was the flight attendant that made the call to the ground services, and you hear in her conversation right at the end (unless it's now been scrubbed from the net) her saying "It's a frame" but you have to listen real careful! If I can find the recording I will link it.
Any luck?
Hi firstly my memory was playing tricks, it wasn't Betty Ong it was the flight attendant CeeCee Lyles who made the phone call to her boyfriend, where at the end she whispers "It's a frame"!
I've found it again here at around the 36 min mark or sightly before, you can hear the telephone call for yourself. Like building 7 many have never heard about this either.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/NXkyGZHxnBeK/
Dude you're a research savant fellow Qautist! -this is a compliment btw as it takes someone with real patients and dedication to dig for a internet scrub like myself
Glad to help out another anon, I'll take the compliment fren.
As predicted, the real voice recording is scrubbed from the internet after a 10 min search. No where can I fins the reference to her saying "it's a frame" whispered at the end.
History HAS been scrubbed from the net!
I'm positive I have saved it offline, but will take a while to find it fren, but believe me it is real and she whispered them words.
U know everything is in question when an election steal is this obvious. Even questioning if the Nazis were on to something being the antithesis of communism, and given we are seeing American communists have some success now in the usa. The 45 things communists want to do to America list really woke me up
So a plane causes massive fires yet people videod on the hole the plane made! Illogical at best!
Yeah I have a few questions too ,, for sure it was rigged with bombs , All the airlines were obviously in on it. The people .. the only ones they ever talked about was that dude who said "let's roll " ,, all of it was such a disgusting murderous lie. But I'm still trying to figure out the planes too ,, there was no plane at the pentagon that's an easy one
Yup agreed with this
https://yewtu.be/watch?v=y5UyynjxAyw
I beleive there were planes of some description that hit the buildings but that the towers were blown up via controlled demolition.
The passengers were violently crushed and their remains were immediately burned to ash upon the impact and combustion of the planes, which were very definitely real and very definitely not holograms.
I'd love to jump in and defend the Holograms/Passengers were diverted off to another airport and told to make panicked phone calls and then killed idea but I can't really go that far. I don't trust Michael Aquino to be an honest source. I think the planes DID hit the buildings but I believe they were controlled remotely. The box-cutter arabs WERE involved but essentially patsies. Additional explosion material was in the buildings to make sure they came down.
https://septemberclues.info