"Framing" is EVERYTHING
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (51)
sorted by:
Having an abortion does not make you un-pregnant. It makes you the mother of a dead baby.
I'm still confused over what the issue around abortion actually is. The left seems to act like getting pregnant is the same as catching a cold, and people have no control over it. While conservatives seem to have the stance that pregnant is a conscious choice.
Aside from cases of rape, it's a matter of risk management. Unless one is mentally disabled, by middle school they know the potential consequences of having sex: getting pregnant. They make a CHOICE knowing full well the possible risk, yet want a get-out-of-parenthood card whenever the outcome doesn't go the way they planned.
Name checks out.
As the Bible states, she is “with child.”
That was in the old days when life was precious and meaningful.
It still is.
Yep. On target.
All of the above comments are indeed on target.
This is a POWERFUL post Sircatsfive! o7
If you want the child to not grow up to be a hyper sexualized communist. This society must also stop treating father's as 2nd class citizens. All degenerate fuckery is stopped by a strong father. Yet both conservative and liberal judges overwhelmingly use the phrase, "iN ThE BeSt InTeReST oF tHe CHilD. ThE MoThER is GraNTeD FuLL cUStoDy." The same mother who will raise daughters to be degenerate whores and sons into hyper sexualized thugs.
They did / do this by intend! They want to destroy the family. They want women to work, to be "independent", so that the children will be raised by the government and through indoctrination and everybody feels deranged, without roots, without orientation and without deeper connection.
Every woman needs a strong man at her side and a caring, protecting father. But women today have been totally brainwashed and men/fathers have been legally seperated from their loved ones.
and men/fathers are hardened against women/mothers with boring unsexy moral values and want to pursue "free" sex from women that they don't have to contribute any meaningful support or protection to.
Excellent post. So true and needs to be the norm on how we talk about children.
God Bless You
-- Denis Prager
I suggest defining your age by date conceived or by the date the woman found out she is pregnant. But I suppose it’s just easier to use birth date
Don't the Japanese already do that?
If they do, then we should adopt that practice as well
https://www.japanese-wiki-corpus.org/culture/Traditional%20Japanese%20Age%20System.html
It's virtually impossible scientifically speaking, to pinpoint the exact date, the exact moment of conception. But it's obviously much easier to pinpoint when a child is actually born, hence a "BIRTHday." But regardless if we can't record the exact moment, the child nevertheless comes into existence the moment they are conceived and a brand new unique human organism which had never existed and never will again, is created.
If you have to use fertility treatment (IVF) you do know when your child/ren were conceived, when they implanted, etc.
True. Though that's not exactly the most common way conception occurs.
You are correct.
They have been changing the definition of everything since the beginning to obscure the truth.
thats why Daniel Webster made a dictionary
In a printed book. Buy printed reference books or download scanned PDFs of old reference books from Archive.
That is put perfectly.
God said He knew Paul before he was in the womb. This means He knows everyone before they are even conceived. We gonna need a lot of Millstones soon!
Maybe we should not define it as the negative un-born either... Pre-born is more accurate and appropriate.
Right on! Powerful.
I love the picture!
well, don't know if it's everything, but it sure is comportment
Our age should be based on time of conception, not time out of the womb. A baby leave the womb at the age of 9 months old.
I like to say, she is with child. Makes heads spin in 2022.
A person does not exist until birth. Nor does it have rights until then.
that would be a slippery slope under a tyranny such as this, not an ethical judge in sight and the state able to take the baby from a mother's womb when they deem the mother unfit or abusive. or able to tinker with the baby in vitro against the mother and father's wishes.
That is why I always liked the term, "with child".
So many of these unwanted children haven’t got a life worth living ahead of them. So for many here the term should be Pro Birth. Not Pro Life. There are tons of rotten parents out there who have no business having kids. Anybody who passes judgement on another person’s choice should be willing to adopt one of these unwanted fetal alcohol syndrome or meth babies. The same children who suck the teachers time away from the students that are able and willing to learn
I'm glad that you made most of your points, but I disagree that those children don't have a life worth living. They get a real raw deal but how we treat them as a society and how the government misappropriates the funds designated for the needy is an absolute abomination.
This is a really hard point. I was a psych nurse for a long time. These babies grow into adults with all of the same issues. It's really hard. To care for them, to find a living situation for them, to support them, many don't have families. I'm not pro abortion. I'm just saying that there are some things that are very hard.
So we should murder all toddlers and adults with birth defects? I hope you're volunteering to tell those millions alive that their lives are worthless...
No. You’re trying to put words into my mouth. But a child brought up in a home with alcoholism, drug abuse and possibly parents that don’t give a shit about their kid isn’t going to be a life anybody would choose to live. On top of that physical abuse, neglect, poor diet and mental and verbal abuse are more likely in homes that haven’t got support for their kids. What kind of life awaits these babies? So to save these kids from that life is to adopt them if their survival is so important to you. Otherwise if you’re against abortion don’t have one. And don’t play judge otherwise
Ok there handshake. You're the one attempting to justify murdering unborn babies by arguing it's more "humane" than forcing them to live potentially difficult lives... y u want to murder babies?
You sound like a person who wants to do the right thing. Is there room in your trailer for adopting a couple of babies?
My trailer? 😂 you assume a lot about strangers, handshake. My situation is irrelevant to the question over whether or not people should be permitted to murder "unwanted" babies. Your argument is that because there aren't enough people willing to adopt "unwanted" babies, therefore it's better to just murder them instead of forcing them to live in less than ideal situations and be further burdens on their mother/parents. Do you also take Swift seriously and think we should just eat the babies?