290
Comments (34)
sorted by:
17
bubble_bursts 17 points ago +17 / -0

Cabal has used every weapon they could to find dirt on Trump, from Mueller to impeachments to that creature Letitia from NY. They have combed through all his financials, business dealings, attorney-client privileged information, even got his own lawyer to dob on him.

and they got nothing.

Why? because Trump was groomed to lead this Plan from a young age. Thats why he doesnt touch one drop of alcohol, let alone drugs. This was to make sure no one ever compromised him.

No matter what anyone thinks about Trump, there aren't many people who are this squeaky clean, and for that the Humanity should be thankful for eternity.

5
Monco121 5 points ago +5 / -0

Really about the only thing that fully adds up and can explain what we've watched unfold right before our eyes right up to where we are now.

8
ozthentic 8 points ago +8 / -0

Only 3 possible conclusions. 1. The cabal really are so stupid they cant find it. 2 This is some super weird psyop with both sides covering for Trump or 3 " There isn,t any" Simple,s

8
TopKek 8 points ago +8 / -0

I've considered all 3 you listed several times. 1 and 2 just seem unlikely. 3 just has to be the most reasonable conclusion

5
HenryBowman1984 5 points ago +5 / -0

Occam says...

Time to shave. ... ;)

-11
FreeSpeechAnon -11 points ago +3 / -14

The most logical explanation to you is that someone who has lived 70+ years has absolutely nothing incriminating in their past?

16
Trumpternal 16 points ago +16 / -0

What dafuq? Most people are not criminals, if you haven't committed a serious crime by the time you're like 40, you're probably not ever going to commit a serious crime.

If Trump has committed any wrong doings it's probably tantamount to financial speeding tickets.

9
CQVFEFE 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yeah, and me too.

The first one is ultra unlikely, as there is nothing democrats are better at than digging up dirt on people to ruin and cancel them...it's their stock in trade and entire reason for existing.

The second one is just utterly absurd, both sides working to cover for Trump. That one can be disregarded immediately.

That only leaves one possibility: the one Trump himself expressed and that we've all witnessed during the past six years of his ascendancy.

Why is it so hard to believe someone isn't a criminal?

Are you one?

No? Then maybe Trump isn't either.

6
Trump_Is_Cyrus_777 6 points ago +6 / -0

Glenn Simpson and the Crowdstrike lot even tried to connect him with Epstein but they only ever found a social connection when they started deep digging...Bill Clinton on the other hand...so they dropped that line of investigation quickly!

It is significant that the worlds intelligence agencies (CIA, MI6, the Italians etc) couldn't really find anything significant so they went to a great deal of trouble to create the whole Russia hoax. Wouldn't have needed to do that if there was some real meat there.

2
WakeUpWorld 2 points ago +5 / -3

OR, and I hope this is not true, but I've wondered since the beginning. What if Trump was installed just like the rest, but he was installed to create Nationalism again. Use media to fool the useful idiots and youth into hating him at same time gaining support of patriots and those awake. Now you have the grounds set for a New Civil War and destruction of America and the entire World. Now its easier to come in and make the New World a more controlled, and communist World.

6
TopKek 6 points ago +6 / -0

This has also crossed my mind but when I consider what is going on, I don't think that's the case. If you think about it, alot of the major stuff dems have tried in Bidens administration have failed

Stack court = failed
Severe gun control - failed
Covid - failed
Vax passport - failed
Vax microchip - failed
Mass vaccination - failed
Force companies to vaccinate - failed
Russia WWIII - now failing
Abortion - now failing
Election fraud - soon failing

When I filter through the noise and consider what's going on, more and more it seems that white hats are still in the game.

Will I say whitehats are in control? I can't because only God is truly in control. What I can do, is pray with all my might that God allows the destruction of the cabal and a restoration of freedom to all people in all nations.

0
huntfishpede 0 points ago +2 / -2

This is what I fear is plausible too. It seems just as likely as Trump being squeaky clean. He talked about "grabbing women by the pussy", anything is possible.

6
Jamezelo 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's not like he said he walks down the street shoving his hand up skirts treating women like a bowling ball. He was joking about how easy it is to get women when you're rich/famous ffs

4
ceegeegee 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, because the person busy shoving his hands up skirts is The Sniffer. (Tara Reade anyone?)

(Okay, the bowling ball reference just gave me a major chuckle. I wish I had said it to a friend of mine who was horrified that 'as a woman' I could vote for DJT.)

2
Monco121 2 points ago +2 / -0

To infiltrate the world he infiltrated you have to be a pretty good actor. He was one of them, so they thought (assumed).

4
TopKek 4 points ago +4 / -0

Nothing incriminating enough to destroy him at least. He's gotten divorced, probably cheated and all the "standard" bad stuff, but nothing like murder, child rape, satan worship or any of the other insane stuff elites are generally into.

Do you have a 4th possible explaination? I'm open to hearing it.

3
HelloDolly 3 points ago +3 / -0

All of his incriminating stuff is out and it's mostly about his personal life.

2
Monco121 2 points ago +2 / -0

All the things they privately laugh about, celebrate and backslap each other over when it's them doing it.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
Fringe--dweller [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

at the end of the day that is between consenting adults, maybe not to everyones' liking, but some adults like that kind of foreplay.

5
justicein2020 5 points ago +5 / -0
  1. it's the normal sorts any businessman in newyork does. and nobody wants to pull on that thread.
    on any side. thats how you get shot in the back of the head and throw yourself in the river as a cement block.

but on the scale of politics dirt... TRUMP IS A FREAKIN BOYSCOUT WITH AN ACTUAL HALO!

And that's one of the reasons he makes them so crazy insane rage...
they can't comprehend someone like that! not a filthy piece of shit swamp turd! unthinkable!

4
BasedCEO 4 points ago +4 / -0

Occam's razor would point us to 3

2
Wtf_socialismreally 2 points ago +2 / -0

Assange basically said "Yes, Trump is a dick. But Trump is pretty transparent as far as dicks go. What you see is what you get"

3
HenryBowman1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thing is, simply calling a spade a spade isn’t dickish. It’s simply telling the truth that some don’t want to hear.

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can be a dick and be an honest one. Not all things need to be said.

The difference is that I'd take an honest dick over a dishonest piece of filth, like leftists.

5
MordenGeist 5 points ago +5 / -0

If there was any shit on Trump, it would have been flung around by the [DS] like a troop of rabid chimps.

Think logically: what has happened to EVERY individual that was against or no longer useful to [them]? Destroyed reputations or suicide. How many times has that rabid troop of chimps flung shit at Trump, only for it to ricochet right back on [them]?

People trying to say no way Trump is clean forget to take this into consideration: the literal WORLD tried (and still trying) taking Trump down with every dirty trick and lie they could muster. All failed. Use your head for something other than a hood ornament.

3
BQnita 3 points ago +4 / -1

she disgusts me.

3
MICHIGANisRED 3 points ago +3 / -0

If she didn't look like Hooker Barbie, she'd probably be cleaning toilets at Washington Post or NYT.

1
BQnita 1 point ago +2 / -1

ahahaa!

2
Vstablegenius45 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is the real reason Assange went from being the hero of the left to being the worst person ever in a heartbeat, also cause he showed us what a shitbag hillary is.

2
intellectual-darkweb 2 points ago +2 / -0

Based on the interview, he seems to imply "We don't have any" - not "There isn't any."