Paul is absolutely right to say that we can't afford this. Why is it our responsibility to pay everyone else's expenses? We can't use our own oil anymore. We can't grow our own food anymore. Does anyone believe that Schumer and McConnell give a rat's about the people of Ukraine?
But he isn’t really blocking it. He is asking for financial accountability language in the bill. So he is a conditional “yes” when he should be an absolute “no.”
Good point. But Rand is a shrewd statesman. By him asking for a perfectly reasonable modification to a bill that he knows his swamp colleagues will oppose, Rand damages his swamp colleagues more than him simply voting against it would.
In this way, the public gets to observe the swamp rats trying to evade legitimate spending oversight measures; and that will naturally raise public suspicion, and invite [unwanted by the swamp] public attention, and scrutiny.
He's just making sure they add enough soap to launder the money cleanly. All those idiots are rushing to get their share of kickbacks while the channel is still open.
What the fuck is this money even going to? How do you take 40 billion and turn it into war fighting capabilities after the war has already started? Plus aren't we already sending them missiles and equipment already?
I swear this is just some huge money laundering scheme, to move funds around that were not able to be moved around because of Trump. My guess is Russia, Ukraine are both in on the take.
Let's Go Brandon! IMO, fiscal responsibility and oversight is reasonable for $40 billion; especially with all the due haste required based on the side deals, MAGA Rand Paul!
Think about it: By now it is obvious that Biden is a traitor just watching since his inauguration = he is destroying the country together with the democrats.
Every politician from the GOP supporting this bill now is an enemy to the country and by allowing to further weaken America and denying that Trump has won by a lot, working for the interests of the NWO and an enemy to humanity.
I hope he holds out! Found out that one of ours actually said he was going to vote yes to it but the other one never mentioned it at all. So after I saw that the one voted yes, I sent him a message to change his stance on Ukraine, not that he will care "IF" he reads it, but let him know I wasn't happy about it. And we (folks in our district) also let the other jackass in the house know how we felt after finding out he voted for it also. Only problem is no one runs against these clowns to vote them out.
This spending should not have been approved. If you can’t live within the budget, except for military funding for our troops, Medicare/Medicaid, social security, it should not be approved. Government agencies need to slash budgets now, fire/lay off non-essential workers. That also means zero aid to illegals-make it clear they stay in Mexico because we are not paying for food, housing, health care or education of non-citizens. The money is being used as a kick back to politicians, government officials, and to those funding the bio labs. The Ukraine permitted illegal activity in their country by the U.S., Germany, Ukraine, Poland, etc. which was detrimental to the world, so no further aide.
Paul is absolutely right to say that we can't afford this. Why is it our responsibility to pay everyone else's expenses? We can't use our own oil anymore. We can't grow our own food anymore. Does anyone believe that Schumer and McConnell give a rat's about the people of Ukraine?
But he isn’t really blocking it. He is asking for financial accountability language in the bill. So he is a conditional “yes” when he should be an absolute “no.”
Good point. But Rand is a shrewd statesman. By him asking for a perfectly reasonable modification to a bill that he knows his swamp colleagues will oppose, Rand damages his swamp colleagues more than him simply voting against it would.
In this way, the public gets to observe the swamp rats trying to evade legitimate spending oversight measures; and that will naturally raise public suspicion, and invite [unwanted by the swamp] public attention, and scrutiny.
He's just making sure they add enough soap to launder the money cleanly. All those idiots are rushing to get their share of kickbacks while the channel is still open.
Waking up the sheep but putting strings on it?
God bless Rand Paul.
More like a temporary stall. It should get passed next week.
Sounds look more time to gaslight the sheep.
RINO Rand is at it again.
I can't wait until people wake up from him.
What the fuck is this money even going to? How do you take 40 billion and turn it into war fighting capabilities after the war has already started? Plus aren't we already sending them missiles and equipment already?
I swear this is just some huge money laundering scheme, to move funds around that were not able to be moved around because of Trump. My guess is Russia, Ukraine are both in on the take.
https://media.gettr.com/group18/origin/2022/05/11/05/69d775cc-c835-a3a8-3ec0-89394f6883ee/daba816acb9831d9ed7cda48a3b0dfca.jpeg
Let's Go Brandon! IMO, fiscal responsibility and oversight is reasonable for $40 billion; especially with all the due haste required based on the side deals, MAGA Rand Paul!
Let’s go Randon!
He still voted on that big tech and big media merger bill tho so I don’t trust him
This is fantastic.
It’s almost as if the deep state is desperate for cash. Damn you, Rand Paul!
I wonder why the Roth’s or Gates or Soros just doesn’t write zelensky a big fat check for whatever he wants? Why didn’t they outbid Elon for twitter?
Think about it: By now it is obvious that Biden is a traitor just watching since his inauguration = he is destroying the country together with the democrats.
Every politician from the GOP supporting this bill now is an enemy to the country and by allowing to further weaken America and denying that Trump has won by a lot, working for the interests of the NWO and an enemy to humanity.
Hero
How do we find a list of which senator agreed to this bill?
“Paul refused to allow the unanimous agreement needed…”
So, sounds like 99-1.
I hope he holds out! Found out that one of ours actually said he was going to vote yes to it but the other one never mentioned it at all. So after I saw that the one voted yes, I sent him a message to change his stance on Ukraine, not that he will care "IF" he reads it, but let him know I wasn't happy about it. And we (folks in our district) also let the other jackass in the house know how we felt after finding out he voted for it also. Only problem is no one runs against these clowns to vote them out.
This spending should not have been approved. If you can’t live within the budget, except for military funding for our troops, Medicare/Medicaid, social security, it should not be approved. Government agencies need to slash budgets now, fire/lay off non-essential workers. That also means zero aid to illegals-make it clear they stay in Mexico because we are not paying for food, housing, health care or education of non-citizens. The money is being used as a kick back to politicians, government officials, and to those funding the bio labs. The Ukraine permitted illegal activity in their country by the U.S., Germany, Ukraine, Poland, etc. which was detrimental to the world, so no further aide.