'ANOTHER' mass extinction event...... Q is implying this isn't the 1st time...... and I doubt it's the 2nd
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (98)
sorted by:
The first 2 in recent history, are as Q said, WW1, WW2.
WW3 was the planned 3rd mass extinction event.
WW1 & 2 were just minor "cullings". The Black Plague (~1350 AD) was likely a cabal instigated "Mass Extinction Event" where approximately 1/3-1/2 of all Europeans were exterminated, and 60-70% of all men in some locations. Very likely caused by contaminated water and sabotaged sewage/sanitation. Whatever the cabal used it appears to have been targeting men in some locations (bacteria along with other stuff, probably cholera caused most deaths).
It looks like there was a "Mass Extinction Event" in the 1400-1500 AD timeframe that may have wiped out 50-80% of humans. Real history has been intentionally jumbled so unknown if this event was also the Black Plague+follow up events, and they have shifted the history timeline a bit.
There appears to have been another "Mass Extinction Event" that occurred near the end of the Roman Empire instigated by lead contamination from the lead water pipes (neruotoxins make people go batshit destructive and possibly sterilizes).
I suspect one in Ancient History around the Pompeii time frame. Unknown if they had ability to initiate volcanic eruptions at that time as is suspected now (directed energy). Santorini (Mediterranean) destroying itself was supposedly around 1500 BC, and this looks like another "Mass Extinction Event" to me (I don't believe the dates, but I believe the volcanic ash in the atmosphere can actually reduce crop yields and create starvation-induced depopulation and an excuse to blame "disease").
So this may be the 4th or 5th time. I regard "Mass Extinction" as at least 50% of the population. Historically, these events are identified by periods where there are suddenly a massive number of orphans or average age of population suddenly drops (as the young are most resilient with strongest immune systems).
I'd throw Roe v. Wade in there post Viet Nam.
WW1 & 2 don't really seem like an extinction. More like a lead up to weaken the world for the real extinction in WW3.
Its not just how many killed by the wars. Its how many people were never born because of that in future generations and the decline in fertility rate in the aftermath to decimate demographic replacement rate of national populations. The demographic consequences to ethnic Russians has been very dire. Each man killed between WW1&2 in Russia is 6-8 less kids each generation. This compounds each generation.
That's not really true though, because it's women who are fertility bottlenecks, not men. You can decimate the male population but as long as there's a few left the next generation will be about the same numerically.
The difference is culturally. In Britain the aftermath of WW2 saw an increase in single-motherhood and that led to a huge change in societal behaviour. Lack of father figures played its part in the "sexual revolution" - aka societal degeneracy that occurred as that fatherless generation grew up.
It is true. It is written about extensively. What do you think happens in a nation with way more women than men for breeding pairs and marriage? In a Christian culture. With a destroyed society. Some go without. Some go abroad. Years of war and decline also flattening fertility rates. Not to mention all the women that died in the war.
You realize that human fertility rates have always been low when male death rates are high? From the stone age to now? Because they are the production and provisioning of a society. Even today all the jobs women work are largely propped up against the wealth men produce to get redistributed.
Its a researched fact. Its called a demographic echo.
Good point, but (and I honestly want to know) how much of that was made up for when the military returned home and started banging like rabbits? The name Baby Boomers wasn't just plucked out of thin air.
In fact I wonder if the powers that be actually didn't predict the huge rise in birthrates? Did that in fact lead to more US intervention in the world - Korean War, Viet Nam, Gulf Wars, etc.?
Americans don’t count the same. We entered at the end and didn’t suffer at home. Russia and Germany suffered massive massive losses in comparison to the US. And our dudes came home to an intact country. 80 million men died in the Soviet meat grinder. People don’t tealize the Russian Empire and USSR had way more people than the US. They had like 400 million people by WW1. There is a reason “they” genocided Russia.
It has been decoded that Rothschild's WWII was slated to last for far longer than it did.
FDR + Hitler in office = 1933
FDR + Hitler dead = April 1945
"There war was likely supposed to last a lot longer than it did but as best I can tell FDR/Hitler’s death represented the moment the military took over the country.
This required Truman’s cooperation and this is represented in how he initially pretended like he was going to keep FDR’s people, he quickly removed them all EXCEPT FOR FORRESTAL.
This change in direction is likely why Truman’s approval rating dropped like a rock, going lower than Nixon’s lowest.
Forrestal meanwhile got a promotion.
04/12/1945 FDR Death/Truman takes over
06/1945 FDR’s Attorney General/ Sec State/Labor all let go
Only to be suddenly fired in 1949, which led to his “suicide” less than 2 month’s later."
DecodingSymbols
Who was FDR? This is a big rabbit hole. It appears there were 2 or 3 people that “played” FDR. They appeared to use his “polio handicap” to effectively keep him out of the public eye when needed and then used body doubles frequently when needed. Original FDR clearly cabal family, but did he “expire early” and need to be replaced?
It appears the intent was to make him semi-permanent dictator with infinite terms through the use of multiple people, body doubles, and deception. This was a coordinated strategy in many countries at the time to have single “figurehead” or administration in charge for 16-20 years because this is about how long it takes to solidify full control (1 generation of brainwashed kids).
We know that Truman was “put in place” for some reason. Just look at how and when he ended up VP. It does look like a shadow military move to me. I believe the “Truman Show” is still playing, and I’m running out of popcorn.
And I suspect that Dewey really did defeat Truman at the ballot box, but that fraud got Truman in.