DJT Jr..."Here's a different perspective on School shootings"
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (28)
sorted by:
Not to be crude but an additional perspective..... in relation to the 'narrative', whats the difference between kids killed in school or at birth?
B. Q. Q. M.
Nothing. Kids are still dying and that's the main problem. They use our children as pawns for their anti-ANYTHING political agenda, and if you don't believe them then boom, kids have exploded. Then they, using this tragedy, tell you, "Don't you feel sad? Don't you want to ban these horrible, harmful _____?" You (Not you specifically but ykwim), still stricken from the tragedy and the grief, say yes. Then, that thing is banned. Next thing you know, they're on to the next thing to ban. Eventually we as a society will be desensitized to these acts and then they truly have freedom to do WHATEVER they want to our children.
Beta took his oppurtunity to use a tradegy and it didn't work out like previous operations.
400 kids under 16? Holy shit. I had no idea.
I know that many people get shot in LightfootLand but I have always figured it was mostly gang wars.
The kids are raised by the gangs and are in gang life at a very young age
I had no idea. I’m thankful I just wanted to live somewhere where there aren’t lots of people. 27 years ago I moved myself and my daughter 3000 miles to a place I’d never been before, on $500. Best use of $500 ever.
have a guy in the office who worked with kids like this, literal 12 and 13 year olds putting out hits on each other. Told me about a gang of 13 year olds that shot some girl dead and threw her mangled corpse in a river or some shit. Insane, sad, dark stuff.
I wish we could get a podcast (like at least one long episode) involving Donald Jr., Elon and maybe like a James Woods or Mel Gibson.
Mel is a legend!!
When it comes to 2A and the convenience that is blaming it for "school shootings," I just make it very simple for those who oppose it. When you're dealing with emotional people of low IQ, sometimes the only way is to break it down in idiot terms.
In most cases, even flaming liberals will agree upon the reason why the 2A exists. They will give you some variation of the answer that it's to "prevent the government from tyrannical takeover by arming the citizenry" and that it's outdated. (more or less)
Since they can all agree upon that simple premise, I pose a simple question.
If a law was created to protect citizens from the government why would you be comfortable having that same government fight to abolish the law that was written to protect you from THEM specifically.
Most people are too dense to even think about it basically in this manner. This has actually made some people think twice from my experience.
Not to mention how fast they take "donations".
https://qagg.news/?read=816
How about nobody died and it's all a hoax to take your rights away?
He's got a missing Y.
He's also missing an S too, in the word "insists" right after "media"
That one I'm not sure about. Can't Media be used as plural, like "they"?
If we can find a missing p, o, and p, then we might have something.
Or nobody died.
Define "hypocrisy"...they want our guns to control us...the media is in bed with and is ZOG!!
Just think, there was a person that could have saved the planet & people..... But, there was an abortion. Now there dead, we are not saved.. but, Planned Parent HOOD made some money on the remains
Bingo
I'm not emotional about it at all.