When hearing about Sussman, just remember...
✅ - TRUTH - ✅
Sun Tsu's Art of War
Step 1 - Engage target in a battle that doesnt matter
Step 2 - Loose battle but only just.
Step 3 - Enemy believes they are winning (We are here)
Step 4 - Begin Endgame of the real battle and win
This is logical, this will settle some nerves and put them off guard. Only time will tell if we've been played or not. I'm prepared, it's just super demoralizing.
Exactly, they're now in a position of believing they can't loose, whilst Clinton has been proven to be involved.
Just cause Sussman got away with this, doesn't mean nothing happened.
Was Durham just fishing Sussman? Lots of things on the record now I’ll bet.
I thought this is what was said January 19th. Let them steal it so then we can catch them. Something something something now we got them where we want them... kraken etc. I'd be lying to myself if I just ignored all that and pretend it never happened.
It's logical, but not for the purpose of giving the DS a false sense of security. It's logical because the purpose was for Durham to legally introduce evidence into record that can be used for other indictments. It also shows the world that DC is too corrupt to hold uncorrupted trials.
Remember, RICO laws were first used against the mob, who also bribed judges and jurors. Durham has experience with convicting mobsters. He would have expected this outcome.
This is the correct take, because this is how the legal system works. I expect lots of demoralization psyops as well.
I’m not sure how the “now they can use the evidence elsewhere trope” started. The fact that evidence was admitted at one trial doesn’t mean it would be admitted at another - that’s not how the rules of evidence work. There’s also no reason why you wouldn’t just introduce the evidence you wanted in the trial you wanted - there is no rule that it has to have been previously admitted in another proceeding.
The mob was brought down by turning the members against one another - hard to do with an acquittal as he’s lost all leverage over Sussman.
Sussmann getting off this hook only puts others on the hook. His acquittal, in effect does point the finger at someone else. The fact remains- fraudulent evidence was received and used by the FBI.
If Sussmann was not working for Hillary, or anyone at all, as he claims, then it has to mean that someone else has to come up with a reason for why the fake evidence was created, and either accept sole responsibility for creating it, or point the finger at someone else who "made them do it."
Respectfully, I disagree fren. No one else has to come up with a reason for anything - the burden rests solely on the Government to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt, no one has to prove their evidence.
And, legally speaking, the trial didn’t prove that the FBI received fraudulent evidence. All it proved is that there is a reasonable doubt that Sussman criminally lied to the FBI.
Mook turned on Clinton, and that was pretty unexpected
I do. People who don't know wtf about much misinterpreting Q post about (paraphrasing) "how do you introduce evidence".
That's how.
It’s not showing anyone anything that they didn’t already know. Anyone paying attention to this trial knows DC is a corrupt shithole. Normies have no idea this trial even existed.
Only the economy going to shit will get normies to care. Their main priority is entertainment.
Yeah I'm not even sure what the point of these trials are. It's unlikely anything productive will come from them. If the military is the only way why are we even bothering paying attention to this? If the military is the only way we might as well just tune out and wait until the economy collapses.
Yeah I might check out until the economy collapses. Normies care about entertainment more then their own children. Why the hell should I expect these people to ever wake up when half of them STILL WEAR MASKS.
Solid
I keep reminding myself - Musk said he was gearing up for months of struggle. I've heard this same sentiment many times.
Looks like we're close, feels like we're close, but I think we have a ways to go still.
Seriously…esp if we’re talking about using info in another trial.
You don’t purposely lose a trial just to have evidence at a second trial. You could have just introduced the evidence you wanted to at the second trial and skipped the first one. Not sure why people keep saying this.
Time.
Normies need time to digest this info.
So they are breaking it up across multiple trials to spoon feed it to them and give them time to digest.
Especially since as this happens, it's being confirmed with growing events of corruption and decay. This confuses them so they are seeking answers, but it can only be in many steps or they will reject it out of hand as being too weird.
Yea I don’t know either. Maybe to ease the pain. Or maybe “we don’t know what’s happening behind the scenes”.
I’m gonna focus on the WHO win and wait and see what happens in the next 48 hours. Every time there’s a “huge blow” there’s always a win around the corner.
This is horsepucky, to cover for the lack of any habbenings of substance. The endgame is a permanently collapsed economy and world governance, in you haven't figured that out before now. Happy to be of assistance.