She's controlled opposition, wasn't she one of the WEF's Young Leaders?
Even if not, there's always a feeling that something is afoot with her. At least she demolished any electoral chance Kamala had during that debate. That dismantling was very satisfying to watch.
This. She called out Kamala Harris in the primary debate, and she gave that awesome speech about freedom and the constitution at CPAC. She has been calling out the hypocrisy of the Left and dropping red pills.
So was Maria Bartolommeo... pretty much anytime that has a audience has been involved with them. It doesn't mean they bought into their plans of world domination- it was just good résumé builder.
Should every young ambitious aspiring leader automatically know the WEF is evil globalist scum? I doubt they would be forthcoming with their evil intentions. Tulsi probably thought they were prestigious, and great to have on her resume. I can't fault for that. It only matters what she does in the present.
I love how people see Putin or Ivanka on WEF and immediately say, our inside people to know what’s going on inside and expose it, then when it’s Tulsi, she’s always the trickster, same with Elon. Elon has done much against the cabal even though he has some shady history. Now tulsi is doing the same. Slamming the WEF, she better have or find protection. And no matter what person we talk about, we must always be weary of their true intentions. You can only be sure of 1 person’s intentions, and that is your own. God alone can read the hearts of men. We can only judge by actions and words. We have assigned actions as greater than words because it is generally more inline with the heart and words are easier to deceive. You tell your wife that the dress makes her look pretty but you are making an ugly face, easy example. But watch any spy movie, you know that people can master faking emotions, actions, as well as words. Therefore you cannot trust anyone truly, only trust must be layered. Obviously we trust Trump based on layers of actions he’s taken & words he’s spoken. He most likely is who he says he is. He is quite true to his character, which includes exaggerating stories (MSM says he lies a lot, he exaggerates a lot).
She's controlled opposition, wasn't she one of the WEF's Young Leaders?
Even if not, there's always a feeling that something is afoot with her. At least she demolished any electoral chance Kamala had during that debate. That dismantling was very satisfying to watch.
Always the possibility that she flipped.
True, if Elon could, then anyone truly could.
Or was a plant
This. She called out Kamala Harris in the primary debate, and she gave that awesome speech about freedom and the constitution at CPAC. She has been calling out the hypocrisy of the Left and dropping red pills.
Or sleepers
It has been known for years she is not a Patriot.
Ghosts in the machine.
I think Putin was part of the WEF too.
Exactly. It's important to consider and account for context.
Yep a lot has to do with "getting ahead" and that might be a prerequisite
So was Maria Bartolommeo... pretty much anytime that has a audience has been involved with them. It doesn't mean they bought into their plans of world domination- it was just good résumé builder.
Should every young ambitious aspiring leader automatically know the WEF is evil globalist scum? I doubt they would be forthcoming with their evil intentions. Tulsi probably thought they were prestigious, and great to have on her resume. I can't fault for that. It only matters what she does in the present.
So glad to read comments like this.
This shows critical thinking is alive on the board!
Thanks, pepe.
I love how people see Putin or Ivanka on WEF and immediately say, our inside people to know what’s going on inside and expose it, then when it’s Tulsi, she’s always the trickster, same with Elon. Elon has done much against the cabal even though he has some shady history. Now tulsi is doing the same. Slamming the WEF, she better have or find protection. And no matter what person we talk about, we must always be weary of their true intentions. You can only be sure of 1 person’s intentions, and that is your own. God alone can read the hearts of men. We can only judge by actions and words. We have assigned actions as greater than words because it is generally more inline with the heart and words are easier to deceive. You tell your wife that the dress makes her look pretty but you are making an ugly face, easy example. But watch any spy movie, you know that people can master faking emotions, actions, as well as words. Therefore you cannot trust anyone truly, only trust must be layered. Obviously we trust Trump based on layers of actions he’s taken & words he’s spoken. He most likely is who he says he is. He is quite true to his character, which includes exaggerating stories (MSM says he lies a lot, he exaggerates a lot).
I was thinking the same thing. She might not have known what she was getting into. Few people did at the time.
Yep. I think she was in the same class as the one eyed butt pirate and maybe alex soros?
She supports red flag laws. Enough for me.