Modern Christianity has turned into a globohomo promoting parasitical institution. Female leaders, dykes, trannies, fags given high ranking positions.
Bending rules and accepting homosexuality under the guise of "Jesus loves all".
The old "hate the sin not the sinner" bullshit which has been fundamental in causing modern Christians to accept homos into their lives and church as if the Bible isn't crystal clear on what the crime and punishment is.
Pedos everywhere, money being laundered from crime syndicates and pushing covid, jabs, WEF you name it.
By human nature we do NOT respect those who fold on their principles. No one is going to respect an institution that is weak and can't hold steadfast the rules of God.
This isn't to say that man doesn't make mistakes. But what the Church does is not mistakes. It is by design to corrupt our youth and mold our minds.
I do NOT believe Jesus Christ was some pussy who accepted everything. I highly doubt Christ would walk into a gay pride today and love every homo who wears a diaper and dances in front of children with degenerate parents who bring them there.
Christ rampages through the temple when he witnessed the corruption with money just imagine what he would do if he saw this degenerate modern day garbage filling our streets.
Now think what you may of Muslims but at least they have held their beliefs together for the most part. I've NEVER witnessed a Muslim family accept faggotry. Never.
Same with Jews. Lots of gay Jews and their people certainly push it onto society (Khazars) but you'll never see that shit openly accepted in their communities.
Every third pastor these days is half a fag and allows it in his church.
All major religions promote congregations and the reason why is for support and community. An individual relationship with God is essential to the individual but the congregation is a must. The reason why is simple; IF the belief is strong within the congregation then the individual within it cannot be easily corrupted or influenced by outside agents.
This is why the congregation was always promoted.
Why do you need an intermediary? Why can't you have a relationship with God himself..who told you it's not allowed?
Jesus is the intermediary and only through Him does one reach the Father. Congregation at the church of believers is a house of prayer and is for uniting people together in prayer for a more powerful form. When congregations forget this precept, then the congregation devolves into a form of group think. Bible studies are a good place to share individual readings and discovery. The church congregation needs to focus most on the power of prayer.
"Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me." -- John 14:6
"I am the gate. If anyone enters through Me, he will be saved. He will come in and go out and find pasture." -- John 10:9
You better lawyer up. Jesus is your lawyer. He represents you.
It is admitted by all church authorities that no record of anything Jesus said was recorded.
His father according to the Bible was a wicked alien called yahweh. Yahweh is neither immortal or a God..he drank 6 litres of wine a day and then beer he liked the abdomen fat of women and babies..there are over 600 commandments he left with tribe of Jacob who picked him as their commander. There are written records..it was only 5000 years ago!! Jesus was a hybrid alien but not immortal. His mother and Mary's mother also hybrid aliens.read your Bible..but as there was no word for god in old hebrew or eternity when you read god think elohim..or angel or lord.it is the aliens
See my comments for links.
You are referring to the biblical manuscripts, A manuscript is a handwritten copy of an original writing. Obviously, the tape recorder was not invented yet. So, all manuscripts were hand copied.
There are 24,363 manuscripts of the Bible. After the papyri manuscripts were discovered, an abundance of other manuscripts came to light. We have manuscripts that date to 60 AD within a generation of Jesus' live (i.e. Magdalene papyrus, 7Q4 and 7Q5 of Qumran 68 AD).
There are tests of historiography that all books of antiquity are judged by for their authenticity. In comparison, Aristotle wrote his writings of poetics in 343 BC and yet the earliest copy [manuscript] we have is dated 1100 AD. That’s nearly a 1,400-year gap in time. Only 5 manuscripts are in existence. Caesar composed his history of the Gallic wars between 58 – 50 BC and yet the earliest copy we have is a 1,000 years after his death. Only 9 to 10 copies now exist.
Incredibly, people do not question the authenticity of these writings. We take them to be fact. I have alluded to one of the tests of historiography where the number of manuscripts and the earliest copies are evaluated. This is called the Bibliography test. I can challenge anyone to muster up the top 10 read books of antiquity and they still won’t come close to authenticity of the Bible. In addition to this, we have the living line of “Church fathers,” (Ignatius, Polycarp, Clement of Rome, et al.) From these writings outside of the New Testament, there is the entire New Testament – all but 11 verses. They quote the writings of the gospel and epistles 232 times.
The Internal Evidence test is another feature of the Tests of historiography. This test examines what the writers have said about the events that took place. Aristotle’s dictum is implied – “The benefit of the doubt is to be given to the document itself, and not arrogated by the critic to himself.” As an analogy, if I told you I owned a green coat, it is your responsibility to prove I do not own one. Until then, it is assumed that this is indeed the truth. In law, I believe this premise is called the law of presumption.
You will find at least 23 different times the writers of the New Testament recorded they were “eye witnesses.” Moreover, they proclaimed Christ Jesus and His resurrection often to hostile crowds. They appealed to the knowledge of their listeners when speaking about Jesus’ resurrection. They spoke of it as a fact, as common knowledge, which any public speaker knows is risky business. They wrote about people, places, times that corroborated with each other’s testimony. Each writer expresses the story from their personal experience, from how the events affected them just as witnesses today would describe indelible events they experienced. These Gospel writers died terrible deaths. Peter, James (son of Apheas), Andrew, Philip, Simon, and Bartholomew were all crucified. Matthew and James (son of Zebedee) died from the sword. Thaddeaus was killed by arrows. And the brother of Jesus was stoned to death. John was dipped in boiling oil several times, but wouldn’t die. He must have impressed his torturers because he was then exiled.
The External Evidence test is the third test of historiography. It accounts for whether other historical material confirms or denies the internal evidence found in the manuscripts. There are over 21 documents that are widely accepted by archeologists outside of the books of the Bible. These all confirm the message of the New Testament. Some of these are Flavius Josephus, Justin Martyr, Plineus Secondus, Tertullian, Cornelius Tacitus, Hippolytus, Polycarp, Lucian of Samosata, Suetonius, Thallus, Phlegon, Mara bar-Serepion, the Talmud, Eusibius, Irenaeaus, Ignatius, Origen, Cyprian, Clement of Rome, et. al.
Quite right.
Most of what you describe as wrong with Christianity, is due to infiltration of Christianity as part of a stated objective of another group you mention...
Of course no doubt about it. And that infiltration, imo, has caused believers to reject it outright and sent a message to those who were on the fence that Christianity is weak and easily corrupted.
One might say the same thing about the U.S. Government, although, it seems that the corruption makes the country all the more attractive for illegal immigration. The same group, by the way...
That’s organized religion. Not Christianity
I should have written the Church
Careless posting diminishes your credibility.
I'm not too concerned with cement heads who view the world in one way.
You posted your thesis before you thought it all out. Bad move. You grossly mis-spoke and now you are stuck in a dance of backing and filling, correcting and clarifying to the place where you have lost the lead in the narrative. You are straining to regain some semblance of standing on a topic which you started, while more clear-thinking posters repeatedly hand you your head. You should probably figure out a graceful way to exit.
This a joke of some sort? Christianity is being rejected due to the Church lacking any morality or principle in it's stance. I compared it to other religions whom, for the most part, are sticking to their rules.
Just because I clarified some issues doesn't mean I'm dancing back and forth.
What you lack in ability to comprehend doesn't mean I am dancing around the point.
Everything I posted is accurate and none of it is false. It's been evident for years. And there are comments posting their own opinion of the situation including from non religious points of view.
You trying to lecture me on your analysis is comical considering you're too stupid and bias to understand anything other than the title. Now go sit in your corner you pretentious little twat.
It's not Christianity itself, but organizations that claim to be Christian.
The Orthodox church does not condone homosexuality, although many new-age Christian churches (and other so-called "Christian"/organized religious establishments) do.
[EDIT: This, too, is stated very well regarding the stance of the Orthodox Church regarding homosexuality.]
The basis of the religion is based on the bible right? My skepticism is when I look around and I see how power has influenced every aspect of our lives with mis/dis/mal-information in order to lie to us into some sort of submission, how do we know the bible hasn't gone through the same type of edits from people in power over the years.
I whole heartedly believe in God and I want more than anything to believe Jesus is truth, but with everything we now know... how do we know he is? How can we trust the bible? We are to believe that no one has altered the "word of God" for their own purposes over thousands of years?
Exactly. Anatoly Fomenko mathematician and his team say the Bible stories are made up and repeated to add another thousand years..to make the religion more credible and older...loads of false flags their version of CNN doing war scenes etc nothing changes!
Every time some scheming pope or monk wanted to big it up then it was copied destroying the original...and that's once they got it out from the Jews...
Then there is house of Jacob whose testament it is..there are other Israelites records..in an effort to big up Yahweh a quite lowly alien commander with only them choosing him out of a couple hundred commanders bigged him up..left out his female mate.. mentioned in Coptic orthodox Christian Bible and others ..she was well known and generally cut out everyone to give him top billing. Even Elyon the leader is hardly mentioned.
The pimping out of a Abraham of his wife calling her his sister..also copied by his son Isaac.with his wife...making them wealthy..daughters getting father's drunk to have children in the bloodline marrying half sisters and the raping of little girls three years one day..legal and all other stuff showing them to have animal tendencies..despite high technology.
Mauro biglino reads it out in parts..says it's a soap opera like the sopranos.
The title amounts to throwing the baby out with the bathwater. As if all denominations have fallen in favor of the queer movement. Not so and its not even close.
The largest church on the planet, the Catholic Church has done nothing but promote degeneracy especially after this new pope.
I guess you didn't see what the fags in Italy did for pride parade but you should check it out. It proves my posts point.
I'm not a Catholic or a denominationalist, but I can certainly say not all Catholics agree with this black pope. Again, it doesn't represent the vast majority of Christianity. You're throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Not even close.
You have to understand when the largest org representing "Christianity" behaves a certain way, it does have the effect of what I described. This post isn't describing your view on the subject.
It is how normies think.
Apparently not. It's just your title inferred a sweeping condemnation [of Christianity]. Most Christians will say the Vatican and its current black pope doesn't represent them. I say this because not only Protestants and the Eastern Orthodox Church oppose the Vatican, but in Catholicism itself, there is a great rift between the pre-1964 Vatican I faithful and Vatican II Catholics. Mel Gibson is an example of a Vatican I Catholic.
I wrote very specifically that I can see why so many people reject Christianity. Not why so many Christians reject Christianity.
There are billions of people who are not Christian and know nothing about it other than associating it with what the media represents Christianity as; the Pope, the Vatican etc.
This isn't a difficult concept to understand. Others in the comment section went right into further adding to the topic but a few like you went into feeling like you are being attacked.
Again, think like a normie who knows nothing about pre-1964 Christianity or frankly, anything about it.
It's almost as if some of you are so old you have no clue what normies think outside of the bubble.
You seem to have given yourself away. It may be it's your own "feeling" (emotion) at issue here and not mine. I can assure you that my correspondence with you is quite innocent. And I highly doubt you know my feelings at all. On the contrary, I was just providing an analysis to your title as I interpreted it. It said - "... why so many people reject Christianity". To this wording I simply disagree. That's my logical choice. You and I have the right to disagree. If you are indeed a "normie", this might be a new concept to you.
Alternatively, I may have agreed with you if you entitled it -- "....why some people reject Christianity." That [title] would be a logical choice I could get behind. Perhaps, your title was rather ambiguous and worded insufficiently. Nevertheless, carry on. There's more important issues to tackle. So long.
Well maybe you should read further instead of my title which I clarified several times.
Sticking to arguing about the title when it's been clarified is your problem and clearly you've got nothing better to do so let's not pretend "there are bigger issues to tackle"
Interesting theory, but to me it doesn't make sense based upon the pretense that everyone is so heavily into homosexuality these days. If people reject Christianity under the auspices of it being a bigoted religion, then wouldn't giving the dog a bone (so-to-speak) mean that more of the population would be willing to participate in the new woke revival in the name of GOD?
I mean the people who reject it are true believers and the ones who accept it's modern day practices are ones who hated it prior to it's new world order methods.
For example, look at videos of when the pope speaks at the Vatican. People wave gay flags there now. That shit was not happening before. That demographic now feels comfortable enough to be "Christian" AND live their lifestyle BECAUSE the Church accepts and promotes it.
By rejection I meant true, steadfast Christians. Not modern day folk who accept modern day nonsense.
I didn't write that Christians are rejecting Christianity. I wrote people are rejecting it. As in, people on the fence about it, Christians who attending church etc. My post should have written the Church and not Christianity however I think the point holds.
The Church is the representative of Christianity in most peoples eyes. So when it accepts every degenerate modern nonsense under the sun, lots of people will undoubtedly be uncomfortable and reject Christianity as a easily corrupted religion.
The perspective of the normie has to be considered here and imo that's how normies view things.
The average person on the street knows "Christianity" and associates it with the Church. And yes, there has been a surge but you can easily argue some or much of that surge has been happening due to the Church opening the flood gates to accepting homosexuals, trannies and LGBTQ shit in general.
Mass media is indeed anti-Christian but it's not anti-"Christian" if that version of "Christianity" is what the Church promotes.
To you it may not be seen as it's representative but to normies the Pope is the representative as all the bullshit under him.
And you can argue till your face is blue but the reality is there are now tons of churches promoting faggotry far more than any other major religion does which was the whole point of this post.
Don't get offended because I'm writing what the reality of the situation is.
You're still not understanding at all lol. You keep describing your opinion about my post and I keep repeating it's what normies think of Christianity.
So I'll be clear. I know the difference. I am not speaking from my perspective. This is why I wrote " I can see why..." not "This is the definitive fact..."
And it was this pope who pushed the acceptance of gay members in the Church, regardless of the idea beginning in the 60'a and 70's. You're just arguing for the sake of arguing as if I wrote "Christianity is the Church"
And you're proving my point the more you blab. FFS man lol.
Do you honestly think normies out there understand that in the 60's and 70's the movement began to monopolize Christianity? No. All they see is the pope and some funny dressed characters with a cross.
Check your thick skull before you begin lecturing about the history of the movement. NORMIES don't view it as you do. Normies view it as I posted.
And if you have that much faith in them understanding the reality of your description of Christianity, then go ahead and ask non-religious randoms or better yet, go read some posts on twitter, reddit or any other major social media platform where "Christians" are discussed. They associate the Vatican, the Pope and Catholicism with the general view of what Christianity is.
You're offended because you didn't comprehend the original post and you took it personally.
its really sad, makes it difficult for people trying to get back into their faith and find God . good churches are few and far between, where are people suppose to go
Agreed. The church has really broken so many fundamental rules to appease degenerates.
Well fren, I can promise you this. God will use these people for his greater good. Don't be surprised if we see a wave of gay guys/gals switching sides so to speak.
There are certainly lots of homosexuals who are "Christian". However, one of the problems is the modern day Church says their lifestyle is accepted. So this makes them comfortable in pursuing that lifestyle.
Now, one can argue that "well it's better for them to be part of it" and sure, that may hold some benefit.
But what that does is normalize that the the church, a representative of Christianity is okay with homosexuality.
Christianity is not okay with it. Never was and no amount of twisting of words will ever make it so.
So unless the Church comes out and says "unacceptable", then this path it's on will continue. The path of normalizing degeneracy. And "gay" is just a small part of it. They're accepting and promoting all the other shit that falls under the "LGBTQ" umbrella.
Uh, you are going to the wrong churches.
What I am referring to is not some small Church in a small county. I am referring to larger Churches in cities where massive hoards of people live. I understand a lot of people here feel like their small town is how the world works, it's not. You may have a nice church that is authentic and stead fast. That's not the case if you are in a big blue city. However, I can tell you Synagogues and Mosques for the most part no matter where you go follow fundamentals of their belief. Same with Sikh and Buddhist temples.
The post is meant to compare the corruption in modern Christianity as an organization vs other faiths from a general perspective.
Dont forget the Christian "leaders" who sleep with the whole congregation of women. Drive rolls Royce's after getting high tithes from their congregation. Oh and one who told young single men, "you young single men need to MAN up and marry these strong single mothers and take care of their kids."
Tel Aviv is literally the gayest city on planet earth. Jews are turbo faggots.
Orthodox Jews don't allow that shit. You ever been to Canada? Up there in Montreal they have a Orthodox Jew community who reject everything
Although you are right, Israel is full of faggots.
I do not understand why people reject tue Christianity. What you describe is not true Christianity.
Catholics raping kids didn't help anything either, and that's been going on long before the Globohomo shit.
Agreed.
"Every third pastor these days is half a fag and allows it in his church." I'd say half a fag and 3/4 pedophile.
lmao agreed.
Organized religion is constructed by and of men and will always be corrupted by them. Take the gnosticism pill fren, develop a personal spiritual relationship with God and his chosen emissary Jesus.
People are lazy and look at bad actors in the Church and say "See, tbats why they are bad and full of bs".
Ignoring the fact that it has nothing to do with the religion itself, just bad people being bad. Which is true everywhere.
The truth is, people look for excuses to ignore and deny God. So they can carry on their degenerate ways.
Now replace "church" with school or government and watch people shit themselves. It's a redpill they will deny.
It is a religion based on untruths and guilt. Guilt..Jesus died for you..cos you are a sinner? Guilt makes people angry. Anger and guilt are negative emotions..
When disclosure happens and people realise they were not gods and angels. Divine and immortal but nasty twisted vicious aliens and the whole thing a gigantic con for hundreds of years then I hope people start praying to the real god..the god of all that is in all the universes and world's without number.
If someone really thinks they could have lived without sin, they missed the whole thing.
More to the point.who told you what sin was?
And don't tell me someone who says god told them.!!.
It largely seems to be sexual things or sins against money property..when really the whole of the thing is to treat others like you wish to be treated. That's it
Well, there are the 7 deadly sins. But as to what is all included in that seems to be a grey area for most. Now as far as who told me. God did not. The Bible did as with most.
I always viewed it as anlist of things that are known to be bad or things that will lead to doing bad things
You have your own direct line to the real god of all that exists and what are called sins in the Bible..which is a record of what happened when the aliens invaded by the tribe of Jacob is what they considered sin..a righteous man to them as they said was a hybrid of them..ie an elohim mating with a human. Sin was against them..a sin to withhold your firstborn belonged to the elohim to pass through the fire..or you could buy it for an amount of silver shekels..this is recorded facts as are all their commandments.
All you need do is treat others as you would like and you will find that more than enough.
The Church WAS the believers house of God to worship Christ. Now it is the tax exempt house of liars, thieves, posers, molesters, and families that are there for their portion of the offering plates.