They aren't "vaccines". There is increasing proof that the "clot shots" actually decrease someone's immunity to Covid, but also to infections, diseases and even cancer... making you MORE vulnerable than ever. New evidence shows that the shots can result in sterility as well.
It's not a refusal to take a "vaccine". It's a refusal to take a harmful injection.
When I was in the ER the other night, I was talking to the nurse about the jab. He said he had just returned from his 6th covid infection leave. He had the jab too. Poor guy has no idea he probably won't make it to his planned retirement in 2 years.
Does it even matter? I won’t take the jab regardless. After all we’ve learned about fraudulent studies, would you take the potion if it is finally FDA approved?
Well, I'll believe a trustworthy study, but I think such a study would show that their magic potion is as dangerous or even more dangerous than we already know.
Never another vaccine again - and training all of my children what’s going on now and making sure that any grandchildren NEVER receive a single vaccine of any kind ever. They have brought this on and been proven unworthy of trust ever again. Doctors and hospitals are for stitches and broken bones going forward.
Got a cough/sore throat? 3 days Ivermectin. Still got it? 5 days doxycycline. All available at Tractor Supply on the cheap. Got cancer? 1g (222mg) Fenbendazole daily for 6 months. Viola!
I think there are thousands of cases still in administration. For example that navy officer just passed his admin board after refusing vaccine.
That means that every single refuser is going through the admin board process. It takes forever. They can’t just pull a switch and kick out everyone at once. It’s the military. There’s an enormous paperwork machine involved, a process that has to be followed.
First some context: I'm a 24yr (ret) USAF/AFSOC SMSgt
Speaking as removing 3 POS from the military myself, and been co-signatory on a few more, it all depends on the individuals history of behavior in the military. A good supervisor will document both good and bad accomplishments/behavior on each of his/her troops and keep it on file for yearly performance reports. These things matter, no matter how big or small the notation.
A troop with a lot of bad marks, and documented properly, will take no more than 2 weeks (or less) to be removed from service once the decision process has begun to remove him/her. Improper documentation allows a few to slip thru the cracks that shouldn't but then the supervisor takes the hit on their yearly for not doing their job.
Point: if it takes a long time to get someone out, it's because they have nothing to justify the process. This is why it's taking so long for these folks: Refusing the jab was, by the UCMJ, a legal decision on their part as it was an unlawful order. "The Machine" is having to fabricate justification for their removal to prevent the appearance of being at fault. In the military, the appearance of something often overrides the truth or facts of a given situation; i.e. they'll make shit up before they admit being at fault.
Thank you for insight. What sort of accountability process is there for the giving of an unlawful order? Do you think the sheer scale will lead to any semblance of justice for those who have been wronged by the decision?
What sort of accountability process is there for the giving of an unlawful order?
What is SUPPOSED to happen is an investigation on the unlawful order and who gave it and why. Depending on severity of the order; i.e. did it cause or would it cause certain death, disability, or otherwise deplete the capability of forces under your command. This is outside a combat environment, mind you, as it gets a hell of a lot more complicated in a battlezone where a plethora of factors contribute to what constitutes an "unlawful order". Being commanded to fire upon civilians without cause, for instance, is an unlawful order.
I digress.
The simple fact of this is, for this context, the order would have and did kill, disable, and depleted morale and readiness force-wide. At the very least, whomever gave the order is mandatory removed from that position (fired), showing lack of ability to command, and the order remanded immediately. Troops having confidence in their command is a high priority. When that trust is breached by the very ones giving the unlawful order, the brave ones who know its bullshit will make a stand and refuse that order. This creates dysfunction in an organization that requires functionality 24/7. This is backed up by the Armed Forces own legal framework, known as the Uniformed Code of Military Justice or just "UCMJ".
Do you think the sheer scale will lead to any semblance of justice for those who have been wronged by the decision?
This hinges directly on those refusing ability to band together and see it through with the resolve they should have as being an American and American Military Member. They must see it thru legally and politically, never back down, and call any threat they get thrown at them. The means exists to win, if they seek it.
Thank you again, fren. It just boggles my mind that the military would use the "readiness" justification to push this poison. I'm happy that personnel are speaking out, including high-ranking medical professionals, and some headway is being made. I worry that there has already been too much damage done, not just with current enlisted and officers, but with the whole cohort of children who are tomorrow's US military who are getting jabbed over and over. Will there even be enough young people who are able (health-wise) and willing (still believe in serving their country in one of our armed forces) to supplement the ranks going forward? That would be a readiness crisis, for sure.
I pray that those who are brave enough to stand against this poison jab tyranny will hold fast throughout this storm, and for those who couldn't (or didn't), a means may be found to return them to health. And that those at the top who are making these decisions are held accountable and are served the justice they so richly deserve.
It's politically sensitive. Technically we derive our existence from the 2nd amendment; but the term "militia" is politically toxic. So we can concealed carry in uniform but not open. I'm on the border right now, and I can say every person in our unit has an AR-15 in the truck; fat cases of ammo in their wall lockers. We all go shooting after work, maybe 3 times a week. YMMV
They aren't "vaccines". There is increasing proof that the "clot shots" actually decrease someone's immunity to Covid, but also to infections, diseases and even cancer... making you MORE vulnerable than ever. New evidence shows that the shots can result in sterility as well.
It's not a refusal to take a "vaccine". It's a refusal to take a harmful injection.
When I was in the ER the other night, I was talking to the nurse about the jab. He said he had just returned from his 6th covid infection leave. He had the jab too. Poor guy has no idea he probably won't make it to his planned retirement in 2 years.
How sad is our timeline? Sad these people are deceived but even sadder to learn how many in our country choose subjugation over freedom.
Sucks. Should have resigned.
Long term studies won’t even be completed until the end of 2023. Will you trust the results?
Who's doing the study and where does the money for the study come from?
Does it even matter? I won’t take the jab regardless. After all we’ve learned about fraudulent studies, would you take the potion if it is finally FDA approved?
https://www.lc.org/newsroom/details/061022-pfizers-fda-approved-covid-shot-will-never-be-available-1
Well, I'll believe a trustworthy study, but I think such a study would show that their magic potion is as dangerous or even more dangerous than we already know.
Never another vaccine again - and training all of my children what’s going on now and making sure that any grandchildren NEVER receive a single vaccine of any kind ever. They have brought this on and been proven unworthy of trust ever again. Doctors and hospitals are for stitches and broken bones going forward.
Got a cough/sore throat? 3 days Ivermectin. Still got it? 5 days doxycycline. All available at Tractor Supply on the cheap. Got cancer? 1g (222mg) Fenbendazole daily for 6 months. Viola!
I thought that ship sailed back in the spring where they either complied or got discharged?
I think there are thousands of cases still in administration. For example that navy officer just passed his admin board after refusing vaccine.
That means that every single refuser is going through the admin board process. It takes forever. They can’t just pull a switch and kick out everyone at once. It’s the military. There’s an enormous paperwork machine involved, a process that has to be followed.
First some context: I'm a 24yr (ret) USAF/AFSOC SMSgt
Speaking as removing 3 POS from the military myself, and been co-signatory on a few more, it all depends on the individuals history of behavior in the military. A good supervisor will document both good and bad accomplishments/behavior on each of his/her troops and keep it on file for yearly performance reports. These things matter, no matter how big or small the notation.
A troop with a lot of bad marks, and documented properly, will take no more than 2 weeks (or less) to be removed from service once the decision process has begun to remove him/her. Improper documentation allows a few to slip thru the cracks that shouldn't but then the supervisor takes the hit on their yearly for not doing their job.
Point: if it takes a long time to get someone out, it's because they have nothing to justify the process. This is why it's taking so long for these folks: Refusing the jab was, by the UCMJ, a legal decision on their part as it was an unlawful order. "The Machine" is having to fabricate justification for their removal to prevent the appearance of being at fault. In the military, the appearance of something often overrides the truth or facts of a given situation; i.e. they'll make shit up before they admit being at fault.
Thank you for insight. What sort of accountability process is there for the giving of an unlawful order? Do you think the sheer scale will lead to any semblance of justice for those who have been wronged by the decision?
What is SUPPOSED to happen is an investigation on the unlawful order and who gave it and why. Depending on severity of the order; i.e. did it cause or would it cause certain death, disability, or otherwise deplete the capability of forces under your command. This is outside a combat environment, mind you, as it gets a hell of a lot more complicated in a battlezone where a plethora of factors contribute to what constitutes an "unlawful order". Being commanded to fire upon civilians without cause, for instance, is an unlawful order.
I digress.
The simple fact of this is, for this context, the order would have and did kill, disable, and depleted morale and readiness force-wide. At the very least, whomever gave the order is mandatory removed from that position (fired), showing lack of ability to command, and the order remanded immediately. Troops having confidence in their command is a high priority. When that trust is breached by the very ones giving the unlawful order, the brave ones who know its bullshit will make a stand and refuse that order. This creates dysfunction in an organization that requires functionality 24/7. This is backed up by the Armed Forces own legal framework, known as the Uniformed Code of Military Justice or just "UCMJ".
This hinges directly on those refusing ability to band together and see it through with the resolve they should have as being an American and American Military Member. They must see it thru legally and politically, never back down, and call any threat they get thrown at them. The means exists to win, if they seek it.
Thank you again, fren. It just boggles my mind that the military would use the "readiness" justification to push this poison. I'm happy that personnel are speaking out, including high-ranking medical professionals, and some headway is being made. I worry that there has already been too much damage done, not just with current enlisted and officers, but with the whole cohort of children who are tomorrow's US military who are getting jabbed over and over. Will there even be enough young people who are able (health-wise) and willing (still believe in serving their country in one of our armed forces) to supplement the ranks going forward? That would be a readiness crisis, for sure.
I pray that those who are brave enough to stand against this poison jab tyranny will hold fast throughout this storm, and for those who couldn't (or didn't), a means may be found to return them to health. And that those at the top who are making these decisions are held accountable and are served the justice they so richly deserve.
You make a good point. Thank you for reminding me of how slowly these things play out.
probably the booster now
Until they're due for the second booster and by now they're openly discussing how they might be being poisoned.
I hope all of these gentlemen enlist in the Tennessee State Guard. We welcome you all and honor your service.
Same for the Texas State Guard, the Army discharged me for not getting the vax; now I serve my state instead. This is the way
Do yall train armed?
It's politically sensitive. Technically we derive our existence from the 2nd amendment; but the term "militia" is politically toxic. So we can concealed carry in uniform but not open. I'm on the border right now, and I can say every person in our unit has an AR-15 in the truck; fat cases of ammo in their wall lockers. We all go shooting after work, maybe 3 times a week. YMMV
And the Florida state guard.
Well, yes, because they're dying sleeping in their bunks and now they're probably openly discussing how they're being poisoned.
Question... if they refuse the jab are they restricted from going overseas? Might be a good way to keep from fighting an NATOs insane war.
Question... if they refuse the jab are they restricted from going overseas? Might be a good way to keep from fighting an NATOs insane war.
Man, that Queen bitch Milley is gonna hit the ceiling when he finds out
About damn time.