Did I stumble upon the real 'Q' on Truth Social?
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
I have a nice low profile account on TS and follow President Trump, DJT Jr., Devin Nunes, Gregg Phillips, Julian's Rum , the fake 'Q', etc..... I saw a user I didn't recognize popping up in my feed......... +++@01010001 ........ I checked out some of his posts and all my brain would say is 'That's Q!!!" I will post a few of his posts here.... tell me your thoughts.
Given that 01010001 is the binary representation of 'Q' in ASCII it is clearly someone who wants you to think they are Q. Whether they are actually Q is a different question entirely...
Not really a question, anon :)
"No outside comms."
—Actual Q
Let's examine this:
"NO private comms past/present/future." Q will never contact anyone privately.
"NO comms made outside of this platform." This did not follow with "past/present/future" So, this opens the door for Q to join another platform in the future.
u/#q513
No comments outside of this platform. No comments outside this platform.
Words have meaning
Comms is communications but yes.
this q was asked if he was Q. posted back Not the Q you are looking for.
Is that a riddle though?
also : u/Oasis5130 u/Scotty1954
not a riddle at all.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=532j-186xEQ or just another person with Q clearance.
Probably taking a look (but without thinking it is "our" Q comms for us) can be interesting - but please,please don't claim it is for sure our Q.
No outside comms - right ?
Then we'll never tell you ever - Q
"Well they were wrong weren't they?"
This.
While I agree that is in fact what that means ...
It's not certain that is the meaning totally.
No outside comms PROBABLY means no one else is Q.
But "no outside comms" doesn't EXACTLY mean "no one else is Q" either.
agreed. But it would make sense he would quietly resurface with no confirming tricks ..... and let us find him. IMHO
Fuck it, I'm following him.
Future will prove past.
wAtCh tHe wAteR
If we dont get another Dr Ardis interview, I'll be happy.
I'll own nothing, but I'll be happy.
This is the way
read the posts you copied here, thanks for that, but I'm voting a big NO.
Definitely NOT. in addition to all the reasons other posters said, there's a very new-agey angle to ASCII Q. content and language is totally out of character for Q.