Latest Q #4958: What is at Stake? Who has Control? SURPRISE WITNESS. Who was surprised? Who will be surprised? Use your logic…Q
(media.greatawakening.win)
NEW Q
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (109)
sorted by:
This post reads less elegantly than the old Q. Aware of the supposed deltas tonight but something feels off here. Hope I'm wrong
au contraire.
Reads very Q-ish. Note: this is a post by the tripcoded Q account, not non-tripcode supposedly "delta" "Q" posts being bandied about.
The tripcoded q account is being called into question because it has no deltas and the watkins lies and board fuckery. And i agree having read all the drops this doesn't have the same voice at all. It's clonky. I could be wrong.
I agree with you.
And I don´t think this helps us in any way. We already know what to do when truth comes to light. Spread it, meme the shit out of opposition. We don´t need to know what Q team is going to do exactly, why and what to focus on at this point. Hive mind can catch any significant message at this point I believe.
Sounds like the Original Q before the bots made them start typing in broken sentences with tons of symbols to throw off text reading.
Yeah. With all the questions and long absence..need a rock solid newTrump/Q+ proof.
Anon delta from 8 Chan ;
https://ibb.co/L8JKYht
Accurate??
Could be but then these posts have the problem of no trip code.
The trip code posts have the no deltas problem plus odd rhythm and cadence in the speech.
I'm just going to wait and see how it plays out.
Casting doubt on Q is clearly the new shill tactic.
I have been here since the election. With all the weirdness of the posting and oddities surrounding the return. I am skeptical. I don't doubt the old Q stuff at all, but I think its a good thing to be skeptical when things seem off. When proof's roll in, it feels much better to be able to debunk criticisms with logic, rather than emotion.
I want these to be real but I also don't want to be blindly trust things. So unfortunately I do have a "old Q" and "new Q" category until my mind can decide what is what.
Clearly, there is a question about authenticity.
The good news is this: we are questioning this after only 4 of these drops. So, we ARE using critical thinking, as a group.
Proceed with caution is a good position, unless and until solid confirmation comes in.
However, we can still analyze the drops from both Real and LARP perspectives.
Was Hutchinson's story believable?
No.
So, why would LARP/psyop want to push the idea that she was a plant?
What would be the benefit?
Clearly, it would be something Real Q would want to reveal, but Fake Q?
In a previous era Q used the term: critical thinking. Now he added the pronoun: YOUR to it.
This makes it much more direct.
We should not have to hope that this is the real Q. We start going down that road and we are no different that the people that blindly believe whatever the main stream media says.
Q would not expect us to just have faith without proof. So until there is proof everything that is posted is suspect.
little late to the party on that one dawg 🤣😂
I agree, been saying this for days.
What I saw come from our own people over the last 2 years truly shook me. The same people calling out fake news and media lies were falling right into the same trap, getting swept up into the hype of miniature cult of personalities (not naming names, but I shouldn't have to.) just because they were saying the right things. And if you dare questioned the narrative, you got ostracized and in some cases even banned depending on the "icon of the day". It was just another flavor of the same shit. It's definitely gotten better, as one can only promise things with no tangible results for so long, but it was truly frightening seeing it happen in real time. I think it's what fractured us, really got the infighting flowing and opened the door for obvious social manipulation. I'm terrified it's going to happen again, if not even worse.
Yeah all of these new posts I have to categorize into the same mental compartment as the Truth Social Q account. More data is always welcome, one way or another. BUT this is the first drop on any platform this year that doesn't completely pass the smell test for me.
I hate to say it but it reads like an aspergers impression of the writing style. Too many repeated keywords, it has no flow, and it repeats itself over and over to convey the same basic concepts line after line. It's not that the old Q posts were verbose poetry, but they had a haiku like cadence that expanded your awareness and often left the reader with a cathartic light bulb flickering on in your mind's eye.
Perhaps the lightbulb is already on and your present awareness has subdued the tranquil cadence that caught your attention before? Perhaps it lost its shimmer because the novelty has been tarnished. Or by golly you are right, and the recent Q is a fraud. ✌️
u sure u not q?
Nice.
The fact that the posts that are being critical of the new Q stuff or showing skepticism are being brigaded with downvotes are exactly why we should be skeptical of the new Q posts. We don't know the level of infiltration on this site. It could be a fake Q with shills here trying to shut down the idea that it's a fake Q.
I will remain skeptical until there is a Trump verification of this return of Q. That is the most logical thing to do, in my opinion.
w several on the Q team, this couldn't this have been written by someone we haven't heard from before?
It wouldn't make sense for them to suddenly deviate like this. That would certainly break trust.
Agreed. This doesn’t seem like q
I agree also and it's clear that the shills downvoting your post aren't really Q believers, because anyone that's been following this for years know that the skepticism is healthy, especially with lack of a solid Trump confirmation.
True, some posts were in a different format altogether than the famous socratic questioning that Q has come to be known for. However this post doesn't read as a new style or format, but rather a poor impression of the ubiquitous Q posts of old.
Too many repeated keywords, little to no flow, and repeats itself multiple times to convey the same basic concepts line after line. It's not that the old Q posts were verbose poetry, but they had a haiku-like cadence that expanded your awareness and often left the reader with a cathartic light bulb flickering on in your mind's eye by post's end.