The scepticism comes from the argument that the trip code has been compromised by Watkins fuckery. Checking the trip doesn't help if the trip is compromised. Whether the trip has actually been compromised is a different matter. It's more complicated than "always check the trip code". The OP had provided other good signs to look for.
Keep in mind that Jim Watkins could be getting set-up by bad actors too. There are other ways that the trip codes could be compromised without Jim being the one behind it. And, we do know that Jim has a target on his head.
Why would Jim or Ron risk this?...The entire Q following would hate them forever and Ron's aspiration to hold an office would evaporate. Also on my mind is why would Q/QTeam allow this? Wouldn't they protect the platform that they chose to use?
Why would they allow themselves to be prominently featured in an HBO documentary?
Anecdotal: I watched the first five minutes of that "documentary" the day it dropped, immediately thought "Weird nerd with submissive Asian wife?", turned it off.
Ron was never going to win lol he can’t form a coherent sentence. He has as much chance of getting into political office as Biden does of dunking on a 10 foot hoop.
I agree that it would be foolish for Ron to try this stunt. But Ron is human, and subject to making mistakes, like anyone else. It is conceivable (probable in my opinion) that someone else is making the fake Q posts, and Ron has been tricked by them, or set-up.
Also, Q team may not be able to post to the board for various reasons. Perhaps the board is compromised- the known fake "B post" is evidence that something is/was amiss on the board, and recent trip code errors further support that notion. Or, perhaps there are legal, or other issues that are preventing Q team from posting- we do know that Pelosi and gang were making efforts to shut Q down.
And, of course there is a possibility that Ron is behind the fake posts, motivated by a benevolent desire to inspire the Q community to become more active prior to the mid-term elections, and simply made a dumb move to try to make that happen.
Either way, we should expect much better Q proofs than what we have seen so far. No harm is done by doubting the authenticity of the NewQ posts. But, a whole lot of harm could be done if we are all mislead by fake posts.
It would totally be possible for glowies to setup Jim Watson. In fact I would tend to believe that if Jim made stupid mistakes which allowed anons to uncover something he is being blamed for, (he's not stupid) that he was setup.
Remember Umbrage? CIA tool which can hack a system and leave someone else's fingerprints.
But Jim and Ron would be aware of the 1700 days between 1st post and 1st “new” post a random hacker may not consider details as cover. Spitballing here… Thoughts Everyone please.
I'd say Watkins is protected but if not and he's gettng set up..
Nothing can stop what is coming!
Also the newest (trip code) posts seem like real D and latest makes sense re Cassidy. If they help us with fake posts it doesn't do them (the DS) any good does it.
They were, particularly after a platform change. After a long absence Q would create a new trip. We relied on official channels to confirm identity and verify new trips. I.e. Trump would tweet at the exact same time Q would post with similar content (zero delta) or part of the new trip would actually be written in a tweet; often disguised as a spelling mistake.
However, yes. In between trip changes you don't explicitly know if a trip has been compromised. You have to to rely on the actual content of the Q posts and deltas to implicitly maintain confidence in the identity.
The ultimate Q proofs video in the side bar explains in more detail.
100% Agree. I wish the Q team would address this. Then again, if the Q Op is ‘closed’, the op is closed. We know enough to discern that these posts are not authentic. No trip code = Not Q.
There have been cases where tripcodes were compromised, and Q established himself with new proofs - 0 deltas or other wise.
In the end the proof is always in the pudding. However, in this case the so called zero delta - it was done by a poster without a new tripcode, so its worthless because even if it was 100% legit, there is no way to know if a new Q post is coming from that same person.
Always check the trip code. That is the proof it is Q. No trip code means it is 100% fake.
The scepticism comes from the argument that the trip code has been compromised by Watkins fuckery. Checking the trip doesn't help if the trip is compromised. Whether the trip has actually been compromised is a different matter. It's more complicated than "always check the trip code". The OP had provided other good signs to look for.
Keep in mind that Jim Watkins could be getting set-up by bad actors too. There are other ways that the trip codes could be compromised without Jim being the one behind it. And, we do know that Jim has a target on his head.
Why would Jim or Ron risk this?...The entire Q following would hate them forever and Ron's aspiration to hold an office would evaporate. Also on my mind is why would Q/QTeam allow this? Wouldn't they protect the platform that they chose to use?
Why would they allow themselves to be prominently featured in an HBO documentary?
Anecdotal: I watched the first five minutes of that "documentary" the day it dropped, immediately thought "Weird nerd with submissive Asian wife?", turned it off.
Not to stereotype but ......
Ron was never going to win lol he can’t form a coherent sentence. He has as much chance of getting into political office as Biden does of dunking on a 10 foot hoop.
I agree that it would be foolish for Ron to try this stunt. But Ron is human, and subject to making mistakes, like anyone else. It is conceivable (probable in my opinion) that someone else is making the fake Q posts, and Ron has been tricked by them, or set-up.
Also, Q team may not be able to post to the board for various reasons. Perhaps the board is compromised- the known fake "B post" is evidence that something is/was amiss on the board, and recent trip code errors further support that notion. Or, perhaps there are legal, or other issues that are preventing Q team from posting- we do know that Pelosi and gang were making efforts to shut Q down.
And, of course there is a possibility that Ron is behind the fake posts, motivated by a benevolent desire to inspire the Q community to become more active prior to the mid-term elections, and simply made a dumb move to try to make that happen.
Either way, we should expect much better Q proofs than what we have seen so far. No harm is done by doubting the authenticity of the NewQ posts. But, a whole lot of harm could be done if we are all mislead by fake posts.
I think it was Trump.
Woah woah don't come in here with all this logic and reason.
It would totally be possible for glowies to setup Jim Watson. In fact I would tend to believe that if Jim made stupid mistakes which allowed anons to uncover something he is being blamed for, (he's not stupid) that he was setup.
Remember Umbrage? CIA tool which can hack a system and leave someone else's fingerprints.
But Jim and Ron would be aware of the 1700 days between 1st post and 1st “new” post a random hacker may not consider details as cover. Spitballing here… Thoughts Everyone please.
When you say Ron, are you referring to CodeMonkeyZ?
I'd say Watkins is protected but if not and he's gettng set up..
Nothing can stop what is coming!
Also the newest (trip code) posts seem like real D and latest makes sense re Cassidy. If they help us with fake posts it doesn't do them (the DS) any good does it.
Jim had laid out all in the letter. I got it. Didnt you? Trip code isnt compromised. Its white listed.dig on it.
Do we know he's telling the truth?
They were, particularly after a platform change. After a long absence Q would create a new trip. We relied on official channels to confirm identity and verify new trips. I.e. Trump would tweet at the exact same time Q would post with similar content (zero delta) or part of the new trip would actually be written in a tweet; often disguised as a spelling mistake.
However, yes. In between trip changes you don't explicitly know if a trip has been compromised. You have to to rely on the actual content of the Q posts and deltas to implicitly maintain confidence in the identity.
The ultimate Q proofs video in the side bar explains in more detail.
Never trusted Jim Watkins...
No, the op provided a bunch of false proofs
None of those things (punctuation etc) have anything to do with q. Plenty of tupos in the q canon.
Agree.
100% Agree. I wish the Q team would address this. Then again, if the Q Op is ‘closed’, the op is closed. We know enough to discern that these posts are not authentic. No trip code = Not Q.
But I think it is totally possible for CIA to hack tripcode and blame it on J. Watson.
Do you remember Umbrage?
Not only fake but also gay
That settles it, then.
There have been cases where tripcodes were compromised, and Q established himself with new proofs - 0 deltas or other wise.
In the end the proof is always in the pudding. However, in this case the so called zero delta - it was done by a poster without a new tripcode, so its worthless because even if it was 100% legit, there is no way to know if a new Q post is coming from that same person.