Moreover, there has NEVER been any virus isolated or purified in all the history of Virology. The virus myth is used as a modern day Bogeyman to frighten the public. And this is precisely its intent.
Wake up people. They can't get you to submit to their evil plans if you're not frightened.
Are you claiming they do? I don’t need to make any claim that something never proven to exist does not exist. Would I bother to claim that elves don’t exist? At this point it’s completely obvious to anyone not afraid to consider it, and frankly it’s embarrassing when people believe they exist.
You're doing the standard lefty "I make a claim and call anyone who doesn't agree names, then demand evidence I'm wrong while I am under no such burden for proving my own claims"
THAT is embarassing. The fact that there is a PROCESS for isolating viruses is a pretty big indicator they've succeedeed.
Biochemist here. There is a process that mixes cells with diseased animal cells and toxins, incubates and kills everything, sounds out and picks up random genetic material, feeds the sequences into a computer, then fills in the remainder based on human assumptions and produces a virtual construct.
Proven: The same results occur whether there was a sick human cell or a healthy human cell.
Not proven: no virus has ever been directly observed by any level of microscope.
Bacteria, gems, parasites, all isolated, all observed.
Proof of what I’m saying? That’s easy. Https://learninggnm.com Giving you proof is not a challenge at all. The challenge is in you not being too afraid to read it all. Even more so, you lasting even longer than 5 minutes. Let’s see how you go. In the same way that a lefty can’t watch a trump speech, you too will find the same challenge with this. Take all your courage.
I don’t have a claim. You idiotically claim without proof that viruses exist. I say prove it, you refuse because reasons and that’s all there is to it. Oh and also you’re all smug about it because you’ve got a whole world of idiots on your side.
You stupidly parrot what you've been told without ever considering anything behind it. There is no scientific proof that a virus exists in nature.
I claim there is no phoenix in nature. It doesn't matter how many virtual computer phoenix have been rendered, none have been isolated in nature. If a lab creates an mRNA injections with pieces of "phoenix" replication instructions to alter your DNA, still doesn't make a phoenix real. If swabs push toxins into your nose or junk is sprayed into the atmosphere or toxins are in processed foods product and people get ill with "phoenix measles" still doesn't prove there's a phoenix in nature.
Koch's postulates are the conditions through which one would prove that a microorganism causes disease.
1 - The microorganism must be found in diseased but not healthy people.
2 - Must be cultured from the diseased individual
3 - Inoculation of a healthy individual should give the person the illness
4 - The microorganism must be re-isolated from the inoculated individual
That process would prove that the microorganism (virus) is the cause of the disease.
Worth noting, that even Propionibacterium acnes (P. acnes) (commonly acne) has not met these conditions.
Bro you don't need to tell us all that stuff. We KNOW the mainstream science, ok? We used to think the exact same thing as you. Telling us what we used to think, to dissuade us from the new knowledge that we've graduated to, is not going to "convince" us to come back down to kindergarten. We noticed a million contradictions in the mainstream theory that you have not yet noticed. But... maybe you soon will.
I literally explained to you the process through which one would prove a causal relationship between a microorganism and the disease it causes.
Those postulates have NEVER been demonstrated for ANY virus at any time, over 100+ years, even with acne, something that was 'known' as the cause of pimples for a long time.
Common sense on this issue is carried over from what was 'common sense' in the later 1800s.
No, not 'nothing' making people sick as much as bacteria and viruses are not what we are told. The terrain theory places bacteria as a way to 'eat' dead cells so that toxicity doesn't' spread through the body. It also puts viruses as cells who were damaged and self-destruct which gives the appearance under a microscope of the virus 'blowing out' a contaminated cell.
This debate was going on in the time of Louis Pasteur, who argued that germs were infecting people and causing illness whereas the competing terrain theory was suggesting that bacteria and viruses cannot exist in a healthy environment and are actually part of the process of bringing the body back to a baseline.
Viruses probably exist, but essential research is suppressed or is not done, to drive the narrative that viruses are deadly and that vaccination is how to be protected. When real science is done, we will likely find a better appreciation of viruses as part of the human virome. "Viral diseases" will be understood as caused by poor nutrition and systematic chronic or acute poisoning.
I’m open to accepting that viruses don’t exist, but in all of the threads where this comes up I’ve never seen an explanation for what causes “viral infection symptoms” (I don’t know how else to describe it for now). Can you point me towards the real cause of the flu, pneumonia, fevers, etc.? What is it that’s causing an immune response in people?
Glady: https://learninggnm.com . Also, be willing to let for if the term ‘immune response’. There is nothing to be immune to, as I presently understand it. Even bacterial stds, which I’m no stranger to, are easily explained.
Infections symptoms can arise from many toxins found individually or in combination, in one's environment. Historically, many forces have pushed us, with zero proof, in the direction of simply believing that the causal agent for most diseases must be a virus. Why?
A virus is invisible, can't be micrographed or isolated (unless using the term isolation as redefined by virologists), but it can kill you and must be feared. Feared so much that you must surrender your liberties to the experts who are the only ones who can save you. The virus is an incredibly effective and inexpensive weapon that the DS can use against trusting people at any moment.
CDC doing a big favor for all the normies (99.9999%) whose brains would explode if they faced the truth that there are no viruses.
The normies won't understand it.
Moreover, there has NEVER been any virus isolated or purified in all the history of Virology. The virus myth is used as a modern day Bogeyman to frighten the public. And this is precisely its intent.
Wake up people. They can't get you to submit to their evil plans if you're not frightened.
Are you claiming they do? I don’t need to make any claim that something never proven to exist does not exist. Would I bother to claim that elves don’t exist? At this point it’s completely obvious to anyone not afraid to consider it, and frankly it’s embarrassing when people believe they exist.
You're doing the standard lefty "I make a claim and call anyone who doesn't agree names, then demand evidence I'm wrong while I am under no such burden for proving my own claims"
THAT is embarassing. The fact that there is a PROCESS for isolating viruses is a pretty big indicator they've succeedeed.
Biochemist here. There is a process that mixes cells with diseased animal cells and toxins, incubates and kills everything, sounds out and picks up random genetic material, feeds the sequences into a computer, then fills in the remainder based on human assumptions and produces a virtual construct.
Proven: The same results occur whether there was a sick human cell or a healthy human cell.
Not proven: no virus has ever been directly observed by any level of microscope.
Bacteria, gems, parasites, all isolated, all observed.
Proof of what I’m saying? That’s easy. Https://learninggnm.com Giving you proof is not a challenge at all. The challenge is in you not being too afraid to read it all. Even more so, you lasting even longer than 5 minutes. Let’s see how you go. In the same way that a lefty can’t watch a trump speech, you too will find the same challenge with this. Take all your courage.
I don’t have a claim. You idiotically claim without proof that viruses exist. I say prove it, you refuse because reasons and that’s all there is to it. Oh and also you’re all smug about it because you’ve got a whole world of idiots on your side.
You stupidly parrot what you've been told without ever considering anything behind it. There is no scientific proof that a virus exists in nature.
I claim there is no phoenix in nature. It doesn't matter how many virtual computer phoenix have been rendered, none have been isolated in nature. If a lab creates an mRNA injections with pieces of "phoenix" replication instructions to alter your DNA, still doesn't make a phoenix real. If swabs push toxins into your nose or junk is sprayed into the atmosphere or toxins are in processed foods product and people get ill with "phoenix measles" still doesn't prove there's a phoenix in nature.
Okay?
I’m starting to believe more and more every day that the only virus’ people contract are through injection, not the farce of “modern virology.”
Let’s easily test your knowledge. Is virus the only that can affect the body?
Not in the context of modern virology.
Koch's postulates are the conditions through which one would prove that a microorganism causes disease.
1 - The microorganism must be found in diseased but not healthy people. 2 - Must be cultured from the diseased individual 3 - Inoculation of a healthy individual should give the person the illness 4 - The microorganism must be re-isolated from the inoculated individual
That process would prove that the microorganism (virus) is the cause of the disease.
Worth noting, that even Propionibacterium acnes (P. acnes) (commonly acne) has not met these conditions.
Bro you don't need to tell us all that stuff. We KNOW the mainstream science, ok? We used to think the exact same thing as you. Telling us what we used to think, to dissuade us from the new knowledge that we've graduated to, is not going to "convince" us to come back down to kindergarten. We noticed a million contradictions in the mainstream theory that you have not yet noticed. But... maybe you soon will.
I literally explained to you the process through which one would prove a causal relationship between a microorganism and the disease it causes.
Those postulates have NEVER been demonstrated for ANY virus at any time, over 100+ years, even with acne, something that was 'known' as the cause of pimples for a long time.
Common sense on this issue is carried over from what was 'common sense' in the later 1800s.
No, not 'nothing' making people sick as much as bacteria and viruses are not what we are told. The terrain theory places bacteria as a way to 'eat' dead cells so that toxicity doesn't' spread through the body. It also puts viruses as cells who were damaged and self-destruct which gives the appearance under a microscope of the virus 'blowing out' a contaminated cell.
This debate was going on in the time of Louis Pasteur, who argued that germs were infecting people and causing illness whereas the competing terrain theory was suggesting that bacteria and viruses cannot exist in a healthy environment and are actually part of the process of bringing the body back to a baseline.
Viruses probably exist, but essential research is suppressed or is not done, to drive the narrative that viruses are deadly and that vaccination is how to be protected. When real science is done, we will likely find a better appreciation of viruses as part of the human virome. "Viral diseases" will be understood as caused by poor nutrition and systematic chronic or acute poisoning.
100%
I’m open to accepting that viruses don’t exist, but in all of the threads where this comes up I’ve never seen an explanation for what causes “viral infection symptoms” (I don’t know how else to describe it for now). Can you point me towards the real cause of the flu, pneumonia, fevers, etc.? What is it that’s causing an immune response in people?
Glady: https://learninggnm.com . Also, be willing to let for if the term ‘immune response’. There is nothing to be immune to, as I presently understand it. Even bacterial stds, which I’m no stranger to, are easily explained.
Ok I’ll check it out. Thanks!
You're welcome.
Infections symptoms can arise from many toxins found individually or in combination, in one's environment. Historically, many forces have pushed us, with zero proof, in the direction of simply believing that the causal agent for most diseases must be a virus. Why?
A virus is invisible, can't be micrographed or isolated (unless using the term isolation as redefined by virologists), but it can kill you and must be feared. Feared so much that you must surrender your liberties to the experts who are the only ones who can save you. The virus is an incredibly effective and inexpensive weapon that the DS can use against trusting people at any moment.