6 Foolproof Ways to IDENTIFY TRUTH !!!
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (56)
sorted by:
This is how I figured out in 2016 that Trump was cool.
Finally, someone who knows how to tell the truth when they see it. Amen.
I found the most easy way is to observe what/who the media is attacking.
They attack GME stock the most out of ALL stocks for some reason. I wonder why?
I don't know but it's made this girl who doesn't know a stock from a stick open an E-Trade account just to buy 4 shares! Now I just need to figure out how to do the DRS thing.
Call broker and say "DRS my GME shares"
Or make a fidelity account and trasnfer those shares from E-trade right on over.
Sounds like e-trade takes a few weeks possibly?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/uiz3oh/how_is_etrade_drs_transfer_lately/
And the most "foolproof" way (Scripture) doesn't make the list.
The Bible is the ultimate Truth, and they would love nothing more than to censor it and get rid of it. The bible is banned in many communist countries around the world (look up Bible smuggling). If anyone thinks such a thing could never happen in America, consider that our religious freedom is under attack like never before. Men like Artur Pawlowski are a canary in the coal mine. Just calling out sin for what it is - sin - is now labelled hate speech by these radical socialists, and just meeting to pray is labelled as dangerous. In recent years, legislation has been pushed in states like California and Texas that would ban the Bible, and ban pastors from preaching certain messages that they deem to be hateful. If we aren't careful our religious freedom will go the same way as every other God given liberty that is under siege today.
It's right. Thanks.
Also forgot to mention when watching the MSM news on TV, notice their lips are moving. That is the single indicator that they are lying to us.
One thing missing:
When fact checkers attempt to disprove it.
^THIS!
This is not foolproof. It allows the enemy to create a false narrative and purposely ban it to fool people whose discernment is limited to the logical fallacy of inversion.
You still have to test everything.
The truth is literally the exact polar opposite of whatever the media, politicians, and elite say.
Basically, if they acknowledge it in any way, it must be either true, or close enough to the truth that they want it hidden.
Flat Earth? Realistic? I hate to hijack the point of the thread, but what sort of realistic points are there to flat earth other than the crackpot stuff?
Typical self-impressed smugness. You MUST accept the 10 foot target hidden height in the 2nd image example in my longish reply to FreedomLover2020 or you are nothing more than a banging gong distraction.
Edit: since you worded you reply as a question, I'll humbly take back my response (and even ask forgiveness for making wrong assumptions) if you are serious about looking into the realistic points. People like me deal mostly with nothing but closed minded smugness from people who have no idea what they don't know, so my response is likely a reflex action by now.
I do prefer to see things from more angles than what is apparent. I like to try and understand others perception as best as I can. What can I say? I like to learn, and what better way to learn than to ask?
The crackpot stuff would be the psyop part you mentioned that is controlled opposition. I just want to know what is it that I've missed as I try to see things from as many angles as possible. Only way to learn is to ask.
The Earth is round, and you can prove it with two stars.
Idiot.
OMG - that person's drawings, explanation and snarky comments are hilarious! Thanks for sharing. I've never bought into the whole FE bullshit for a multitude of reasons, but it's always fun to see people who spell it out for FE believers.
What cracks me up is that anybody can see planets, moons and all sorts of celestial bodies (which are ALL round) by using a cheap telescope. Why would everything out in space be round EXCEPT for planet Earth?? And why can't people in Australia/New Zealand see Polaris? Because they're in the southern hemisphere below the earth's axis and it's not visible from that angle.
The whole FE concept is just comical to me. I totally get that NASA is a giant psyop overflowing with dark money projects and endless propaganda, but the flat earth theory is far funnier than any lies that NASA regularly spews.
Repudiation is not refutation.
You didn't read the link.
If you can't read, there's pictures.
And there it is. How dare you have your views challenged.
Can you kindly explain the 24-hour day at the South Pole? We might not be able to witness it, but can get a good idea of how the sun progresses over the seasons there by tracking sunrise and sunset at a very southern location, such as southern Argentina.
HAhaaha this retard still thinks that water is going to curve in lake that is only 4 miles long. Rofllmao, fucking dumbshit.
Get the fuck out of here you fucking shill, please.
So, what about midsummers day near the arctic? The sun barely dipping below the horizon in summer, the further north you go, so that days are 12 hours, then 16 hours, then 20 hours? How does one explain a 21-hour day? Even if its not 24 hours?
Put a basketball in bucket, and then fill that bucket with water, and see if the water is curved due to the shape of the basketball. I don't understand how you idiots don't understand why a lake is always going to be flat. The lake beds themselves aren't curved either, because the earth is not some kind of perfect spheroid.
There a 1000 ways to prove the earth is a spherical. Stop being a retard.
Speaking of unearned smugness wow. You actually are arguing that the earth is flat, and has edge to it? Please tell me are aren't this fucking retarded? Take your fucking dog brain, and your shill tactics somewhere else. You worthless dumb mother fucking human piece of garbage.
You are literally too fucking stupid to argue with. Your reply is so enraging that you've literally disgusted me. Go fuck yourself in a hundred different ways you dumb dog shit piece of trash. Water does not curve around surfaces unless you're talking about the pacific ocean, you fucking dumbshit. 5 mile lake, 10 mile lake whatever. There is not going to be a curve to that, not ever.
"No one who publicly debates or "debunks" flat earth challenges"
Nobody with an actual degree, and a reputation to uphold LOWERS themselves to actually debate the flat earth retards like you. I actually feel really bad that you've been this programmed, to be come this arrogant to argue something that is beyond settled, you fucking time dumb waste of life.