Or. Like my credit card company. They just switched from Visa to Mastercard. Not sure how that stuff works but I wouldn’t be surprised to know this is the reason.
Exactly what I was thinking. But Visa there are lots of different Visa cards. From Capitol One to your local credit union. Are they all considered the same company?
Lots of banks/CU's use VISA for processing payments but they are not part of VISA as a company. This is why you have the logo on your ATM card. Capital One is is the same. They may use VISA or MasterCard for processing but are their own company.
Visa has banking and processes payments, like Amazon had its store but processes for many other businesses. If they have taken it upon themselves to punish legal activity, such as unilaterally choosing all accounts if seems is Ani dealers, then it is consciously monitoring the businesses on its services, and is responsible for whatever it allows. On top of that, it was advised of its connections to illegal activity of the worst kind, which it even acknowledged oncr by cutting off the criminal enterprise, before re-engaging with them, KNOWINGLY. That last part alone should be enough to hold them.
Now THAT … is spot on. What pisses me off is Visa will get a fine from the government in 6 years after all the bullshit appeals are processed and no one will go to prison. That is beyond repugnant. Fuk prison. I want some VISA enablers to ride the lightning.
Moot point, unless you're trying to excuse them from aiding and abetting child abuse and sex trafficking by saying the funds are fake. Still doesn't make the crimes fake.
Not excusing anyone from anything. Just pointing out how its all fake money but as long as people believe it has real value they can use it to get away with crimes. If people came to the mass realization that literally ALL of the money we use for everyday things is conjured out of thin air, and the people in charge have an unlimited supply while everyone else has to work for scraps, AND the people in charge use their unlimited funds for sick depraved shit, once people understand that, the system will crumble overnight.
Visa doesn't ultimately own the debt but they do keep the money for a time while waiting for payments to settle, which they earn interest on, if I'm not mistaken.
Still irrelevant; if a crook cons another crook with monopoly money while helping with child abuse and sex trafficking of minors, they're both still complicit.
I think you missed the context … the premise was all debts would be absolved Because of ‘muh Visa’. Not irrelevant in the context of debt absolution. Visa having executed the transactions, MAY be culpable for processing those illicit transactions, but that culpability would not extend to the debt holder.
EDIT: add: Unless the banks were also complicit i.e. they were well aware of the Visa fukery. I cant imagine in a million years someone at the banks did not know.
This could be huge. All visa debts could potentially be found null and void
Or. Like my credit card company. They just switched from Visa to Mastercard. Not sure how that stuff works but I wouldn’t be surprised to know this is the reason.
Exactly what I was thinking. But Visa there are lots of different Visa cards. From Capitol One to your local credit union. Are they all considered the same company?
Lots of banks/CU's use VISA for processing payments but they are not part of VISA as a company. This is why you have the logo on your ATM card. Capital One is is the same. They may use VISA or MasterCard for processing but are their own company.
^^^ THIS ^^^
Visa has banking and processes payments, like Amazon had its store but processes for many other businesses. If they have taken it upon themselves to punish legal activity, such as unilaterally choosing all accounts if seems is Ani dealers, then it is consciously monitoring the businesses on its services, and is responsible for whatever it allows. On top of that, it was advised of its connections to illegal activity of the worst kind, which it even acknowledged oncr by cutting off the criminal enterprise, before re-engaging with them, KNOWINGLY. That last part alone should be enough to hold them.
Now THAT … is spot on. What pisses me off is Visa will get a fine from the government in 6 years after all the bullshit appeals are processed and no one will go to prison. That is beyond repugnant. Fuk prison. I want some VISA enablers to ride the lightning.
Its all fake money and fake debt. Visa operates the payment network that allows the other companies to transmit the fake money between each other.
Look up Fractional Reserve Banking. It is ALL funny money....
Better yet, Read, "The Creature from Jekyll Island" - G. Edward Griffin.
Will explain EVERYTHING - and where/how the Federal Reserve came about.
Or watch The Money Masters by Bill Still.
https://odysee.com/@KnowledgeBase:e/Bill-Still-The-Money-Masters-Full-Documentary-1996:7
Moot point, unless you're trying to excuse them from aiding and abetting child abuse and sex trafficking by saying the funds are fake. Still doesn't make the crimes fake.
Not excusing anyone from anything. Just pointing out how its all fake money but as long as people believe it has real value they can use it to get away with crimes. If people came to the mass realization that literally ALL of the money we use for everyday things is conjured out of thin air, and the people in charge have an unlimited supply while everyone else has to work for scraps, AND the people in charge use their unlimited funds for sick depraved shit, once people understand that, the system will crumble overnight.
Amazing.... considering the only CC debt I have is with Mastercard -_-
Visa doesn't ultimately own the debt but they do keep the money for a time while waiting for payments to settle, which they earn interest on, if I'm not mistaken.
Visa doesn't actually own the debt. They just process the payments for the ‘banks’ that actually own the debt.
Still irrelevant; if a crook cons another crook with monopoly money while helping with child abuse and sex trafficking of minors, they're both still complicit.
I think you missed the context … the premise was all debts would be absolved Because of ‘muh Visa’. Not irrelevant in the context of debt absolution. Visa having executed the transactions, MAY be culpable for processing those illicit transactions, but that culpability would not extend to the debt holder.
EDIT: add: Unless the banks were also complicit i.e. they were well aware of the Visa fukery. I cant imagine in a million years someone at the banks did not know.