But our Great MAGA leader's statement was made a time dictated by events: Namely the taking of the fifth during a deposition with the office of New York Attorney General Tish James on this day. August 10, 2022.
So for this to not be a coincidence, Q would have needed to know the date of this four years ago. Perhaps my Favorite President had some control over when he appeared for the deposition, but it really seems like the timing was dominated by the raid on Mar-a-lago.
I think we are on opposite sides of the same coin. My view is that Trump said "fishing expedition" on purpose because it makes a Delta for us. He could have called it the "witch hunt" or any other term he found fit to use, but because of the Delta he chose to use fishing expedition. Had this been released tomorrow, I would guess he wouldn't have used that term. Just my thought, right or wrong I don't know.
I think DRan's point is that With the Q board in place, DJT can take many and any opportunities that arise to shoot out a Q confirmation. Just as he can draw an airQ and any given moment.
Trump has ultimate choice over making his statement. The question is, is he perhaps taking the opportunity and using it in a way that resonates with a Q delta.
Using content from the past on a given date doesn't confirm ANYTHING. Anyone can look at past drops and refer to content on any given future date. If anything, it would be a "fake delta" that could be used to "confirm" things falsely.
If it's a delta (and it looks to be) u/Lapstrake is on the correct side of the coin.
That’s kind of the point I was making. Perhaps “delta” wasn’t the best term to use. The way I see it, Trump fit in the word fishing into this because he knew we would look at drops from this date. It’s not confirming anything other than Trump is aware of the Q drops. We know he knows, but in my mind this just kind of shows it to us.
Yes, but the strength of a delta is if it predicts the future. We see that yes the "fishing" relevance is DUE TO the dates of the drop and the FBI raid. Er, I mean, visit or whatever they are saying is the preferred nomenclature.
A delta is simply a change in value, in our case time. Δt = t₂ - t₁. It is just how many seconds, minutes, hours, days, weeks, years of difference there is between 2 things, like a Q post and a happening.
But our Great MAGA leader's statement was made a time dictated by events: Namely the taking of the fifth during a deposition with the office of New York Attorney General Tish James on this day. August 10, 2022.
So for this to not be a coincidence, Q would have needed to know the date of this four years ago. Perhaps my Favorite President had some control over when he appeared for the deposition, but it really seems like the timing was dominated by the raid on Mar-a-lago.
I think we are on opposite sides of the same coin. My view is that Trump said "fishing expedition" on purpose because it makes a Delta for us. He could have called it the "witch hunt" or any other term he found fit to use, but because of the Delta he chose to use fishing expedition. Had this been released tomorrow, I would guess he wouldn't have used that term. Just my thought, right or wrong I don't know.
But wasn't this all driven by the DOJ and the date they chose to raid Mar-a-lago?
Trump didn't have any choice over the date to make his statement.
Unless he is in complete control !
Bingo.
Maybe Trump just choose the best Q word to use according to the day
I think DRan's point is that With the Q board in place, DJT can take many and any opportunities that arise to shoot out a Q confirmation. Just as he can draw an airQ and any given moment.
Trump has ultimate choice over making his statement. The question is, is he perhaps taking the opportunity and using it in a way that resonates with a Q delta.
I think Garland said it wasn't authorized by him, so could be "white hat FBI agents" doing a false flag event. Who knows.
Trump is now breaking fundraising records. It's waiting people up and they're pissed.
If this is true then somebody better start building some gallows...
Using content from the past on a given date doesn't confirm ANYTHING. Anyone can look at past drops and refer to content on any given future date. If anything, it would be a "fake delta" that could be used to "confirm" things falsely.
If it's a delta (and it looks to be) u/Lapstrake is on the correct side of the coin.
That’s kind of the point I was making. Perhaps “delta” wasn’t the best term to use. The way I see it, Trump fit in the word fishing into this because he knew we would look at drops from this date. It’s not confirming anything other than Trump is aware of the Q drops. We know he knows, but in my mind this just kind of shows it to us.
Yes, but the strength of a delta is if it predicts the future. We see that yes the "fishing" relevance is DUE TO the dates of the drop and the FBI raid. Er, I mean, visit or whatever they are saying is the preferred nomenclature.
https://qagg.news/?q=Delta+
A delta is simply a change in value, in our case time.
Δt = t₂ - t₁
. It is just how many seconds, minutes, hours, days, weeks, years of difference there is between 2 things, like a Q post and a happening.Here are a few examples of Q using deltas.