CONTAGION MYTH: DR. TOM COWAN EXPOSES THE FRAUD OF "ISOLATION AND GENOME SEQUENCING OF VIRUSES" Via uk9994@GAW
(www.bitchute.com)
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (82)
sorted by:
The pseudo-scientific virologists aren't doing gene SEQUENCING, they're doing fragmented RNA ASSEMBLING. Said fragments of RNA are the natural byproducts of apoptosis going on 24x7x365 in the human body. It's literally pure deception.
The only question one needs to ask any virus supporter is why they can't find a SINGLE, fully intact "virus" in the same bodily fluids/tissue soup they source their "RNA fragments" from? This applies to all of history and all alleged viruses.
The only way virologists can 'find' viruses is through manufacturing them by poisoning monkey kidney cells (vero) or RNA fragment ASSEMBLING of litle chunks of human RNA in a software program (in silico genome).
In the words of X22 Dave, it's all fake, phony and false.
Occam's Razor: They can't find a fully intact virus in the real world because they don't exist.
Virology is also a great lens to look at science in general. They follow the same formula to propagate pseudosciences and get tons of earnest people believing they are actually doing research, while in reality they are just wasting their own time and simply propagating the same pseudoscience.
The formula is simple.
Create a false basic assumption
Encourage anyone who builds science on top of this faulty assumption and discourage anyone who does not do so - through grants, publications and peer pressure.
Anytime science hits a wall simply because the faulty foundation catches up to it, come up with a new unexplained phenomenon. Examples: Dark Energy/Matter, string theory etc.
You can now encourage a whole new cadre of wanna be researchers in chasing these ghosts.
Exactly.
Assumption >> Financial backing to push the assumption, while denying funding to anyone who questions >> Defend false assumption when challenged >> Change assumption explanation to make it more plausible >> Obtain "consensus" via funding those who agree and denying funding to those who do not >> Push the narrative in the fake news media and the fake education system >> Declare the "Science is decided."
Of course ... that is NOT Science at all. That is government-funded propaganda.
Science is following the Scientific Method, and NOTHING ELSE.
Similar to the CO2-induced warming theory, where the extent of the "science" is that if you had 2 containers where the only difference was CO2 levels (say a greenhouse, or even more simply a bottle of air) and leave it in the sun, the container with more CO2 will be warmer than the one with less. That's it. Everything else exists only in a model or as part of an equation (that really only works in the year of the observations).
Especially true when it comes to high-level physics as you mention, string theory and dark energy / dark matter, which are essentially only mathematical constructs used to fill the gaps with what their math "expects" to see as a correct answer. You hear these string theorists that need to create 20 extra dimensions just to get their math to provide answers that resemble observation. I don't really understand a lot of the math they use, but it seems to be a bit of mental masturbation where there's not even the technology to prove or disprove any of it.
Hell, even relativity, something we all just take for granted as fact, where it's only "proven" in 2019 to the extent that the light from stars can appear to have a distorted position as it passes through the gravity well of the sun, observed during a solar eclipse. Which is a bit of a tenuous proof that could also relate to other principles.
Of course since "it is known" there's really no way to parse out what is factually proven and valid science and what is an "approximation" that's good enough to work while obfuscating something else, whether intentionally or accidentally.
Great point, I had forgotten about that scam.
This is very interesting. I know that the first time when they claimed they proved it during the eclipse and propelled Einstein into some heroic status, the readings were very bad and there was no way scientifically to use it for anything. Would love to hear what exactly happened in 2019? What about all the times before when I am sure they did studies on eclipses?
Also, speed of light. No one has ever calculated one way speed of light (and you cannot calculate it) and yet they accepted that speed of light remains constant regardless of the motion of the bodies - leading to all kinds of fantastical results. More importantly, I believe this was how they proved aether does not exist.
One of the "3 year old" questions I had was, how does EM waves propagate in vaccuum? If its a wave, then whatever it is that its oscillating, must exist as a medium. I strongly suspect this is another foundational lie.
My bad, I should have caught that, the article I found while I was doing the quick search was actually written as "100 years ago Einstein was proven right" type, whereas I read it as relativity was proven after 100 years. I double-checked the paper written in 1920 and would have to agree that they should aim to repeat now that we have tools that are far more accurate than the process they followed. Even though we know on a smaller scale that light bends in a fluid...
I've had many of the same questions about how they get such strong certainty about how they are so certain about how light travels through the vacuum and the use of light speed as a cosmic speed limit. Especially if you've ever seen some of those people trying to explain universal concepts, like the expanding universe, things get very convoluted when they come up with ideas like how the limit of what we can see of the universe is limited because after a distance the objects are moving faster than the speed of light away from us... I'd give other examples, but it's hard to elaborate with sketches.
When you get to things like aether, or electric universe theory, things seem much more elegant, even though you can't discuss it because "those theories were debunked".
So What are we getting sick from
Basically, toxins in the environment. Today, the most prevalent cause of disease is from environmental chemical toxins that attack the neurological system and cause auto-immune diseases. In 2002, Dr. Tom Mack of USC stated --
“My credentials include probably spending more time working up [analyses of] population-based outbreaks of smallpox than virtually anybody ever has.”
Mack then stated --
What about illnesses that spread through a house hold, tribe, or village? How do you explain someone getting sick from being around someone else? Viruses may not exist but can’t harmful bacteria cause illness and be transmitted to others?
Basically nobody knows. What we do know is scurvy "spread" throughout ships at one time, but was found to be dietary. See also the failed experimental attempts to spread the Spanish Flu by sharing disgusting bodily fluids. Perhaps the house hold or group has something else in common? Most "viruses" spread during the winter when sunlight is less, so perhaps it is a reduction in Vitamin D?
Could be as simple as a pheromonal response, where people in a small vicinity are sick that they send a signal of that illness and signal that others with the same toxicity should take the time to clear it up.
The better question is, if viruses are spreading disease, how some people can be exposed and it goes ignored?
The theory is not denying the existence of viruses and bacteria, but rather that they serve a different purpose that isn't fully understood.
No one knows how illnesses are spread. All of the below have just as much evidence as the other.
To a virologist, it is an invisible never isolated 'undead' Bogeyman called a "virus" hiding in ever nook and cranny of your "household, tribe, or village".
To a witch doctor or shaman, it is evil spirits that are befalling people in every household, tribe, or village.
To a UFOoligist, it is UBEs using higher technology that we don't understand used in every household, tribe, or village.
To a Terrain Theorist it is toxins in the environment that is found in household, tribe, or village.
Dr. Tom Cowan explains that circumstantial data (epidemiological observations) like this are not necessarily evidence at all and does not follow the scientific method. You are making an observation. Scurvy was thought to be a pathogen for hundreds of years. The observation was made (and widely believed), but it turned out it was not a contagious pathogen, but the lack of vitamin C. There are dozens and dozens of observations like this that do not follow the scientific method. Virology does not follow the scientific method.
And what about the "smallpox blankets" used to spread smallpox among the American Indians, who had previously never been exposed to smallpox, and had virtually zero immunity to it? There may be a lot we don't know about viruses, but clearly, there are known viruses with known illnesses associated with them.
Two good examples in support of your question are measles and chicken pox which do appear to be highly contagious. Are most illnesses like Covid barely contagious? Are "viruses" real, but too many things are called viruses which are really something else?
Poor nutrition, poor hygiene, toxic chemicals in the environment, poisons in the environment, and/or harmful electromagnetic frequencies in the environment
Most people today eat a shit diet. That creates toxins inside the body, which needs to get out. Anybody who is coughing, has acne, or any similar health issues is someone who has toxins within their body that the body is trying to get rid of.
The body attempts a "house cleaning" detox peridocially, which we mistakenly think of as "cold and flu season." In reality, when there is less sunshine available (Winter, or rainy season in the tropic zone), we produce less Vitamin D naturally. This lowering of Vitamin D, is (IMO, this is my theory) the trigger for annual detox.
Some people are so toxic inside that they get these symptoms at other times of the year, as well. And some are so toxic that they develop a more severe set of symptoms, which is diagnosed as an illness (diabetes, etc.).
There may also be a mechanism within the human body that senses what is happening in others around us. If women are put into a house together, they often find that their menstrual cycles start to synch. Likewise, children with chicken pox are going through a detox (possibly linked to upcoming maturity and puberty), and others of similar age might sense this and get a trigger to detox, as well.
Some illnesses tend to occur moreso in some blood lines than others. For example, black people tend to get sickle cell anemia more than Whites. This might be due to the fact that blacks need more sun exposure to generate the minimum Vitamin D production necessary, and in the modern world, they often don't -- even if they live in modern day Africa.
Families who live in the same households usually eat the same foods (and junk foods), live in the same household conditions that may have chemicals and EMF's hitting them all, etc. When one gets a detox ("sick"), it might trigger a similar reaction in the others.
One thing we can say for certain, and that everyone can agree on: IF viruses do not exist, then viruses can NOT be the cause of these illnesses. Furthermore, because the "mainstream" medical industry, focused on selling drugs and not on making people healthy, has NO interest in pursuing what ELSE might be the real cause. Their gravy train has been rolling along just fine, running on the tracks of what is largely fraudulent "science."
That needs to change.
5g radiation poisoning...it was what killed them in Wuhan ..they had just switched it on....already highly polluted city. People on cruise ships got hit too.. they had 5g. Electromagnetic devices are very harmful to the body...the symptoms can. Mimic vid d deficiency...so called flu...it's all toxic poisoning. Fluoride is a neurotoxin ..eats through concrete....cook with it in the water and its effects are heightened. Known to cause cancer quicker than any other agent..apart from vaxx I presume
It's different depending on which fake "viral caused" illness. There isn't one answer that covers all fake viruses.
Colds/Flus are a disappointment/dissatisfaction "stink conflicts" ("This stinks!") which affects the nasopharynx, sinuses, nose, frontal head area. The more intense it gets, the more fear/worry that is mixed in, this then registers in the pharynx, bronchial passages and lungs.
All "Covid" cases that weren't flus/colds or fake "positive test results with no symptoms" were the result of purging deeply held traumas/conflicts in the body that were exposed and released by the rising light quotient in this realm.
The "passing around" of viruses from person to person always includes the fear/worry/avoidance element, which your psyche then responds to by assisting you with the blockages in the nasal/bronchi/lung areas to help "prevent" you from breathing in the thing you're scared of. This we call a flu/cold. Self-generated via our own complaining/worrying.
100% true.
What should also be pointed out, is that the RNA ASSEMBLING is not only taking the fragments from the poisoned cell culture, but ALSO it takes bits and pieces via the PCR sequencing and CAUSES NEW FRAGMENTS to come into existence.
Cowan has said that if you run 10 PCR cycles, you will get 10% of a "viral genome." But if you run 40 cycles, you will get 98% -- JUST FROM THE EXTRA CYCLES. This means than 80%+ of the "genetic sequence" was MADE UP via the process used.
Right. They won't answer the question because they don't understand the fraudulent process used. They are debating a strawman, never addressing the real argument because of their ignorance of the subject.
Watch this: Dr. Merritt Interview with Poornima Wagh PhD Virology https://rumble.com/v1ga1e5-dr.-merritt-interview-with-poornima-wagh-phd-virology.html
She claims it’s Lipid nanoparticles, graphine oxide and lots of heavy metals. That’s it. There are 35 variations of these 3 items depending on where the vaccine came from.