U.S. Patent Office denies trademark for Truth Social
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (26)
sorted by:
We need to clean house at the U.S. Patent office where ongoing corruption occurs and the Rothschild banking cartel has gained complete control of it. I am not exaggerating this either.
Agreed. I know this too well. I believe that Serco is running that shit show. The USPTO outsources the examination of patent applications to outside companies, such as Global Patent Solutions.
That's what I thought.
It has been this way for quite a few decades.
Serco??? Oh FFS...
I'm interested in what you just said here. I read an article about the corruption at the U.S. Patent Office some time in the past, but can't seem to find it. Internet Search is all been murdered. If you could kindly explain more about your experience was and about Serco I'd appreciate it. I'm familiar with the Invention Secrecy Act, and 35 U.S.C. 181; the so-called Secrecy of Certain Inventions and Withholding of Patent. The U.S. Patent office use the provision allowing them to slap a "national security" gag order on a patent application.
Where all society saving inventions go to die!
Rename it The Trumpet
THE FJB network...
When does the patent office get their weapons and armor?
Let me guess no way that “face book” could be confusing.
Guess it helps to have lifelog friends ;)
I see what you did there.
Jovan Pulitzer said he gets about 100 patents a year and has learned that they always, always, always just automatically kick them out for some stupid reason (great, you know, because it costs 20K + to get one) so he's learned what he needs to do to cut to the chase and get one pretty fast.
Eh... The below are just my ramblings regarding the USPTO and patents after a typical day of work.
I work as a patent prosecution professional to get patents for my clients. Generally, the inventor (especially geniuses like Jovan) tend to always think the patent office is unreasonable. The USPTO probably is one of the more reasonable patent offices to deal with from my experience, although it's just comparing bad and worse I guess. The inventor tends to be thinking in terms of how their invention differs from existing technologies and not how their claims (the part being examined by the patent office) were phrased by themselves or by their attorneys differ from the existing technologies. I'll have to look up Jovan's patents and check out the prosecution history and see which law firm(s) (if any) he uses.
That said, Jovan's patents probably deal with mathematical & software algorithms, and that technology unit of the patent office really is an absolute pain to deal with. Rather than getting hit with existing art, applications in this technology unit gets hit with patent eligibility rejections based on 35 U.S.C. 101 (Inventions Patentable statute) due to the Supreme Court muddying the waters especially in the past decade in the more computational technologies (e.g., AI, business methods, etc.). SC probably muddied the waters to help big tech avoid being sued for patent infringement by small companies and getting bad PR from the public.
Interesting. Thanks for the post. I would love to hear more from you. I'm sure a lot of people here would. It's a peek into a world most of us have not seen, or if we have, did not like, lol. (Due to difficulties.) If you ever care to post about it, I'm sure a lot of people would appreciate it and enjoy reading about your knowledge and experiences.
Thanks for your encouragement! I would be happy to share about my experience in the patent world. Feel free to let me know if there is any questions in particular that you have. Otherwise, I'll definitely be looking at Jovan's patent & patent applications and I'm sure I'll feel compelled to comment as more patent stuff comes out regarding Moderna, Pfizer, and/or others.
Edited to add the below ramblings:
I understand IP law is just another part of the established system used to separate people into tiers. Like how US copyright law has been changed to keep Mickey Mouse protected by Disney since forever... And with patents, it's probably not a surprise that big companies are in bed with lawmakers to steer patent law. The USPTO director from 2014-2017 was Michelle Lee, who went to USPTO from her in-house position at Google.
All laws are written and changed by those in control... But... I don't have any thoughts on what other way to incentivize protecting ideas so I'm rolling with it for now. There are lower hanging problems to fix right now. :)
The patent system is a dead weight around the neck of societal progress.
The risk of it being abused far outweighs any advantage of actual protection in the way it was intended.
I don't think it was ever intended for good lol.
Ok how about TrumpSocial then
Come on, did you expect anything other?
Its not at all hyperbolic to say that EVERY office, department, agency, and function of the Federal government at this point is stuffed with chicom commies, europhile socialists, globalists, and radical leftists.
This isn't our government, its THEIR government that is being forced on us.
So, here's my two cents on the issue... one does not start a social media company without first obtaining the domain names AND the trademark for the platform name. Deviating from this standard procedure is a sign of incompetence, as I can attest to based on my own personal experience with creating a social media platform. So, therefore, we can assume that the TMG leaders either are incompetent or they planned the USPTO rejection from the beginning, so they could publicly cry out for being victimized. Which one is it? TBH, based on my own technological experience, the way Truth Social has been built and opened to the public is a technological clusterfuck of failures. Therefore, I'm quite convinced that the people who are running Truth Social are completely oblivious to the requirements and complexities regarding to operating a social media platform.
All the facts we don't have, but instead assumed.
Rename it Chadville.