While it isn’t a soft intro for newbies, it is packed with some highlights of the facts to date. So I think it’s great. That’s how I learned about 9/11. One day I said, “ Let’s see what exactly all these crazies are babbling about” and realized, oh, they aren’t crazy! 😂
Any thoughts on why Trump didn't reveal what he learned about the 9/11 attacks when he was President? Perhaps it would be too disruptive to the existing world order at the time, and he believed it needed to be revealed along with so many other things at the right time?
My thought is that he/mil intel are using it as leverage. Plus the wake up process has to be slow for a lot of people otherwise their brains will reject the info.
Right? Who would you tend to believe? Architechts and engineers risking their career to expose the truth or goverment officials parroting talking points? Same for doctors telling the truth about the coof.
Meh. Sorry, having looked at this since the late 00's, the 9/11 truther realm is unfortunately full of idiocy and pitfalls between the official narrative and whatever the truth is. There IS a lot of lunacy in the theories, even the ones that SOUND factual and irrefutable (this is very easy to do if you control the cherry picked presentation of items of perception and bits of info and connect the dots with invisible lines so your audience doesn't have to). And that is very likely by design... what easier way to deflect and pariah any serious credentialed journalists from poking into the holes in the official narrative. Thanks to the likes of AJ, "Loose Change", "no planes", etc. ironically promoting many easily refutable "alternative" theories. C'est La Vie.
oh good. We are the news.
Vice reporters diddle kids.
I bet they have lots of pizza parties, with hotdogs and walnut sauce.
Where they leave various cloth articles laying around such as handkerchiefs which they refer to as “pizza related.” Totally normal, goys and gals.
hijacking top comment for the ARCHIVE. Don't give VICE traffic.
https://web.archive.org/web/20220909055019/https://www.vice.com/en/article/dy7d5k/qanon-queen-elizabeth-ii
Well the article captures it pretty well. They just don't understand yet that what we're saying is the truth, but they will eventually.
But they mix in some lizard shit, that's nothing Q talked about. That's one person's opinion on telegram
That's how Fake News works though. Find one tittle and amplify it into a major narrative.
Kinda cool though, that they may be guiding people over here to get red pilled😃😃😃😃
While it isn’t a soft intro for newbies, it is packed with some highlights of the facts to date. So I think it’s great. That’s how I learned about 9/11. One day I said, “ Let’s see what exactly all these crazies are babbling about” and realized, oh, they aren’t crazy! 😂
Any thoughts on why Trump didn't reveal what he learned about the 9/11 attacks when he was President? Perhaps it would be too disruptive to the existing world order at the time, and he believed it needed to be revealed along with so many other things at the right time?
Why didn’t he pardon Assange? Why didn’t he talk about Vegas? Many questions, I hope we get answers to.
Why did he get two scoops of ice cream?
That one I'm most curious about.
Most people couldn't handle the truth that there were no planes.
Proof?
Because there is no "truth" that there were no planes. You certainly can't handle that.
My thought is that he/mil intel are using it as leverage. Plus the wake up process has to be slow for a lot of people otherwise their brains will reject the info.
Right? Who would you tend to believe? Architechts and engineers risking their career to expose the truth or goverment officials parroting talking points? Same for doctors telling the truth about the coof.
The 1776 mention was key there
Meh. Sorry, having looked at this since the late 00's, the 9/11 truther realm is unfortunately full of idiocy and pitfalls between the official narrative and whatever the truth is. There IS a lot of lunacy in the theories, even the ones that SOUND factual and irrefutable (this is very easy to do if you control the cherry picked presentation of items of perception and bits of info and connect the dots with invisible lines so your audience doesn't have to). And that is very likely by design... what easier way to deflect and pariah any serious credentialed journalists from poking into the holes in the official narrative. Thanks to the likes of AJ, "Loose Change", "no planes", etc. ironically promoting many easily refutable "alternative" theories. C'est La Vie.
a/k/a the people who've been right about everything all along
handle with care