Sauce? Sauce??? SAUCE?!?!?!!
(media.communities.win)
Comments (46)
sorted by:
Requesting a source is usually a low-effort escape. They don’t actually want to review your sources. They much prefer that you don’t provide a source, so that their comment appears to be the last word.
When you do provide sources, those sources seem to get disappeared very quickly. Almost as if the guy you were providing the source to reported it, instead of considering it.
Its generally faster to look up things yourself, than to wait for a reply from a stranger on the internet. Everyone online knows how to look things up, so requesting a source is just another way of admitting they don’t want to look it up themselves, and are hoping you wont even spoon feed them.
Uh bullshit, I want to review sources. I'm not trusting anyone I don't know right off the bat because they said so. If you can't provide some sources of any kind of something you've been studying for "so long" you're probably nothing but a LARP.
If your sources have contradictory evidence, I want to debate it.
If your sources mean I'm wrong about something, I want to know it.
Also if that person is an actual expert, they may be able to provide better sources than what your bastardized censored search engines of Google or Duckduckgo can provide in a quick search.
really depends on the person you're talking to. i've shown things similar to what you linked below to some people, and they'll just dismiss it or not read it. sometimes they've told me that the below is far-right wing propaganda. never has anyone read & contemplated and continued a fruitful discussion. it's all quick, emotion-based rhetoric. if they're primed to reject a thesis they'll never agree with any source to show otherwise.
the people the meme targets are the ones who wanna be spoon fed answers and think that everything in this world is orderly and fits in neat little boxes. they'll also gladly watch hours of garbage on netflix but complain about being asked to watch a 30min lecture or documentary because "it's too long".
and when things like vaccine damage, inflation, the trans agenda start becoming too big to ignore they are surprised every time and wonder how these things could've happened.
It doesn't matter what this meme is targeted to. You should always be willing to back up your statements with sources for others to see. To argue for the opposite is to invite the stupidest of the human to confidently strut around like they know everything and we get a shit hole like Twitter.
If they don't accept the answer, that's on them but those lurking should be given a chance to learn and grow.
Of course. I've just had my fair of time trying to talk to people irl who I thought would be willing to, but they've all regressed so I'm currently a bit jaded. People on these boards, definitely there is more hope.
I have no idea, and did not notice til you just pointed that out. I only opened this account about a year ago.
Edit: Ah I get it now. 11M is "11 Months"
Ok, I'll edit that out then. Apologies for that..
Yes, usually people on here are those that seek their own answers rather than having it spoonfed to them.
Prove viruses exist, per Kochs Postulates.
Please don’t try to claim Koch’s Postulates are a quaint throwback to a less advanced society.
Here's pictures of viruses under an electron microscope. You can see it with your own eyes.
https://microspedia.blogspot.com/2017/09/real-electron-microscope-virus-photo.html
Are you a glowie trying to implant stupid shit like Flat Earth Theory into GAW? Do you expect me to move an Electron Microscope to your dumbass house so that you actually believe what you see?
Are you being padded with upvotes by other 3 letter agency accounts because honestly people can't be this stupid, right?
Koch's postulates are the following:
The microorganism must be found in abundance in all organisms suffering from the disease, but should not be found in healthy organisms.
The microorganism must be isolated from a diseased organism and grown in pure culture.
The cultured microorganism should cause disease when introduced into a healthy organism.
The microorganism must be reisolated from the inoculated, diseased experimental host and identified as being identical to the original specific causative agent.
Point 0. Viruses are not considered an organism or microorganism and therefore wouldn't even apply to Kochs postulates. They do not meet the criteria for life but they are like floating DNA strands that may have previously evolved from life and now stick their DNA in to microorganisms to reproduce and function. They have no metabolism which is a requirement of life.
https://www.quora.com/I-read-that-organisms-must-meet-four-criteria-to-be-considered-living-What-are-the-four-criteria?share=1
CULTIVATION OF VIRUSES – HOW DO VIRUSES GROW IN LABORATORY?
https://paramedicsworld.com/virology-notes/cultivation-of-viruses/medical-paramedical-studynotes
⇒ Viruses are the obligate intracellular parasites, i.e. they strictly require a living host or living cells for the growth and multiplication, so they cannot be grown on an inanimate culture medium.
⇒ Three methods are employed for the cultivation of viruses:-
Yes. This is what will happen. If you get bitten with an abundance of Rabies virus in the bite, you will die.
[RARE] Rabies in a human
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-moG6JDmJdc
If you don't get rabies virus you won't die of rabies.
Rabies virus picture
https://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5041/5279807113_13ee17ca3f_b.jpg
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Electron-micrograph-of-rabies-virus-particles-from-a-vaccine-preparation-Bar-200-nm_fig2_230664321
MECHANISMS OF TRANSMISSION OF RHINOVIRUS INFECTIONS
https://booksc.org/dl/68694063/29f074
Proposed Mechanism of Action and Rationale for Ivermectin Use in Patients With COVID-19
https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/antiviral-therapy/ivermectin/
Reports from in vitro studies suggest that ivermectin acts by inhibiting host importin alpha/beta-1 nuclear transport proteins, which are part of a key intracellular transport process.3,4 Viruses hijack the process and enhance infection by suppressing the host’s antiviral response. In addition, ivermectin docking may interfere with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein attachment to the human cell membrane.5 Some studies of ivermectin have also reported potential anti-inflammatory properties, which have been postulated to be beneficial in people with COVID-19.6-8
Ivermectin has been shown to inhibit replication of SARS-CoV-2 in cell cultures.9
The safety and efficacy of ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 have been evaluated in clinical trials and observational cohorts. Summaries of the studies that informed The COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel’s (the Panel) recommendation can be found in Table 4c.
I hope I remember your user name next time I run into another “virus arent real, prove me wrong” person. Of all the things banned on GAW for being “fringe” and non-q related I'm not sure why this topic isn’t included if we’re “concerned about all these new normies coming on to our website who might see something unpalatable”
No... this excuse is a low-effort escape
source?
You made the claim, back it up
Agreed. This is a meme that only shills could love. A convoluted bullshit excuse to not provide any sort of verification for the content of their bullshit posts.
Asking for any sort of proof or verification of content provided by anonymous internet accounts is so very inconvenient for the lying shills.
No worries. It is good practice for people to understand that shills of all types are lying to them every day. People must learn how to protect themselves, and also to find the small amounts of truth buried in all the lies.
Discernment. Good judgement. Nobody can do this for them. Everyone must learn these things for themselves. Practice helps. In that sense, the many shills here on GAW are providing a public service of sorts.
People who understand a subject can summarize it well. As Kurt Vonnegut said "If you can't write clearly, you probably don't think nearly as well as you think you do."
do you have a source on this?
Shame on others for being skeptical of hearsay.
I like the part where CNN told us the 9/11 terrorists hate us for our freedoms.
Well that is part of why CNN hates us
When you provide sources, but then they find any excuse to dismiss them, so they can continue to believe what they want to believe.
Wheres the “source” for this claim that diversity and inclusion is a good thing?
What a wonderful meme for undermining a fact-based, research-driven community. SMDH.
Someone asked me for a source the other day when i told them that a satanic goat was included in the queen’s funeral procession.
I told them to just go ahead & believe me…im not a liar. If they don’t, look it up themselves.
Ive wasted enough time trying to prove shit haha
I watched the funeral replay to find that goat…I couldn’t find it either. If someone found the link, please share. Sometimes people ask for sources bc they couldn’t find it after trying.
Shit…i hear ya. I don’t remember where i saw it though haha
It’s all good in the neighborhood
Serious? That happened?
Yeah dude…goat
I prefer using undisclosed sources
I'm a person familiar with this matter.
Exactly. You want the source? I’m the source mothafucka.
Handshake gaslighting is gaslighting
Or for 50 plus years, your family history involved, and still people calling you an idiot because you don't lay it at their feet immediately upon request.
It was usually not laid out in synopsis form, but took years of library hopping and burning the midnight oil, piecing all sorts of information together to get to your place of understanding.
Even worse is the fact that the cabal has occult beliefs that are not what most whitehats think they are. Literalists trying to explain occult ideas always falls short but seems to be your fault somehow. LOL
Provide the sauce and bury them in it......will they be motivated to read it if they never bothered before? Doubt it. They order sauce and then leave it on the plate unconsumed.
If they constantly have you getting sources, they'll never have to actually argue.
But what about people who just pull click bait tweets off TS and Twatter without checking validity and then get butt hurt when called to backup the crazy claims in said tweet?
Right?!! Great meme. Saved for ammunition/rebuttal. T/u.
A shit meme by shit people.
Only the extreme dumbasses of the world like the left would champion this meme. No accountability for anything ever said if you feel you're above giving any sources.
If people have devolved this far on this site then you're all fallen. You can join the butt fucking faggots and 3 letter agencies in hell.
Lol…wow. Apparently ur having a bad day.
Meme saved was for my normies who want a simple three word answer to a complex DS issue.
Doesn't matter. If they don't like what you have to share then that's on them. It shouldn't stop you from sourcing your information. We are not some leftist shithole website.
If they don't want to hear it, they'll reject either approach but you come from a higher point when you source your links.
Also saving your sourced links allows you to easily replicate what went right and change what went wrong for the next normies.
I know my normies better than you do and how to present info.
Stop assuming.
Apparently you don't. What are you in high school kid?
Ya, you know better. Lol…
On how to convey information? Scroll up on the post comments and see what people agree with kid.
If you share a meme like this, don't blame your belief in "Q" that people no longer believe you
You’ve been here six days. Lurk moar.