not a scam in that he didnt exist - but history and even the bible has been rewritten to make people more compliant.
"Turn the other cheek" has been used to get Christians to allow evil to happen to them or in front of them.
"I bring not peace but a sword, and will turn brother against brother" is not the call to sit and do nothing.
The Catholic Church is pure evil and has been since day 1 it seems. and for at least 1000 years they controlled information on the Bible and most people had to go through the priesthood gatekeepers to be told what the Word is.
"The Kingdom of Heaven is within" and not - "Listen only to the Pope who wears red shoes(and has known pedo symbols on his robes) and a hat to Dagon the Babylonian fertility god and openly promotes abortion and communism"
Yeah. It was written in Greek, so they know what it says. Translation is difficult, but possible. The oldest manuscripts found in caves match what we have now. That’s practically a miracle itself. History records the events. Roman and Hebrew history and they weren’t sympathetic. I’m just saying “Big if True” in the ultimate sense.
It is difficult for most to believe as it is the scope and depth of the organized Evil the world is fighting today.
Even more to realize this battle has been going on for thousands of years, and the same Evil from back then is still behind all these groups now.
And same same worship is being done - money, child sacrifice, - to the horned transgender 'god' is not simply ancient history, but still here to this day and worldwide.
They have been trying this for thousands of years. Just look at the list of countries who have expelled them, including the US southern states... The "Union" was infiltrated early...
Well, I read it through. It’s comical pseudo history at best. But interestingly self revelatory nonetheless. This guy is seething and needs a target. He’s using a sawed off shotgun and spraying without praying. (He’s not accurate, and any hits are accidental) There’s no mention of multi century Tartar occupation of all Asia and Middle East. Mongols don’t look like that mask and they’re not fake Jooz either. No mention of Scythians, Phrygians, Parthians, etc. No mention of massive Persian empire, or Bedouins etc.
I don’t deny “Khazars”, by any name, are afoot, but so are many other groups and cabals, too numerous to mention. There’s plenty evil in every “race”. Also jubilee was 50th year, not 7th.
It’s also notable that they praise the Crusader Templars and revile the “City of London”. They’re the same guys. Templars seem heroic these days, but in the 13th century they had the world by the balls, and acted like it. They weren’t popular. Everyone owed them money, and they collected forcefully.
They also allied with the Aga Khan of Alamut (who still exists, but not at Alamut. ) operating with his Assassins in numerous intrigues. Or so it’s said. The history of Outremer (Palestine under Frankish rule) is cloudy at best. Replete with shifting alliances and internecine squabbles. They took King Abgar’s Mandylion (gifted him by Jesus Himself after resurrection, legend has it)
to Europe when they left. It’s displayed in Turin occasionally. No such fame for the Suderium (face cloth) of Aviedo, but it too was lifted from it’s original location in Jerusalem and taken to Spain of all places. These two relics are authentic, and they match up with forensic precision. They prove each other.
Cultural appropriation, maybe, but I’m glad it’s publicly known, instead of sealed in a city wall at Antioch. It’s had a long journey, but it lasted long enough for modern science to closely examine it.
The latest information is astoundingly confirmatory.
At least I found it compelling. I’m not alone in that.
Then he starts in on Constantine, and the Council of Nicea, and equates Rome and the Roman Church with Khazars, and tops it off with an attack on Jesus and the Gospels, and the “Old Testament” to boot, claiming “Christianity” is borrowed from Buddhism, while praising apocryphal texts which though not included in “the Bible” were kept preserved and studied for centuries in Orthodox Monasteries which survive to this day all over the Middle East, Russia, Eastern Europe, even North America. There’s no Partiarchate Bank of Constantinople! If you want to see what Constantinople used to look like now you must visit Venice. The Doges carted off the architectural splendor after sacking the City in 1204 and occupying it for the several decades it took. Don’t conflate Orthodoxy with Rome. They excommunicated the other 4 churches (Jerusalem Alexandria, Antioch, Constantinople) in 1056. Over wether “Original Sin” implied Anna (Mary’s mother) gave virgin birth as well. That’s the “immaculate conception” concept. It’s based on a mistranslation by Augustine from Greek to Latin. Paul wrote in Greek, which was not Augustine’s best subject. Refuting Mani (of Manichaeism heresy) deserves high praise though. It’s just a nutty concept, but Rome demanded it be adhered to, along with Holy Spirit emanating from The Son as well as The Father, the so called Filioque. Rome went their own way, and in turn spawned Luther, Calvin, and so many others it’s impossible to list them. Maybe it’s for the best, I don’t know. At least we needn’t speculate as it’s all well known. Unlike the pseudo history of a phantom empire that coincidentally rules the world, sort of. They don’t rule me.
Other than that, it was moderately entertaining, in a janky looney tunes vein. Kinda like ancient aliens mixed with Triumph of the Will. Not true stuff. But I didn’t go to college, so what the hell do i know.
Immaculate Conception does not mean that Mary's mother was a virgin. It also doesn't mean that she was not conceived through sexual intercourse. It means that Mary was conceived without original sin, free from the effects of the sin of Adam.
I wasn’t there, so i don’t really know.
I only know the dogma of my Church.
Orthodox don’t believe in “original sin”.
Anna was supposedly beyond child bearing age, and Joachim was incredulous, and was temporarily struck dumb for doubting it.
That’s just tradition, but again, I wasn’t there.
Also no “Penal Substitutionary Atonement”.
I found that comforting. But I’ve no way of verifying it.
I do know I’m not criticizing you personally.
It’s a free country. Believe what you choose.
I hope your pursuit of Truth will be fruitful.
Mary was conceived without original sin? Wow! I haven't heard that one before! So God, who created the universe, is not capable of having a virgin give birth? Wow, just wow!
I never wrote a longer comment reply.
I don’t want people deceived. There’s plenty enough wrong in the world without it.
There’s an old joke about a talking dog offered for sale for $5. A prospective buyer interviews the dog, and hears a tale of work for the CIA, the TSA, etc, as an undercover informant. It’s astounding! So he asks why only $5? The owner says “He’s a LIAR! He’s never been out of that back yard!
The point is; We’re already amazing. There’s no need to embellish.
Yeah...I get what you're saying, BUT...my appreciation is expressed because I've been studying "fringe topics" for 35 years and collecting answers for MY path and you mentioned several things I had not come across or even considered before. So... not stroking ego here, just appreciate the fact that you took the time to go the distance. Cheers.
Anything before 1820 is BS. Jesus died in the 1400s and we are much, much closer in time to "ancient" rome than we are taught. Everything in the historical narrative is BS.
While I’m familiar with the theory that there were no “dark ages” and 700 years were inserted. I don’t buy it. I can’t “know”, but who can? It’s good to question everything.
I hardly think my 3% home mortgage is usury! And keeping a credit card with high interest is a CHOICE people make, again, not usury! I'm not really sure what the point is of bringing up these things that are OBVIOUSLY not usury, in an attempt to "reveal" the "Khazarian mafia". Is this just a veiled attempt at anti-semitism? (yes, I see where they try to distinguish between "true Jews" versus the "fake Jews", but it just seems to muddy the waters rather than making a true distinction)
How is it not usury even if you have a choice to get into it or not? I think what makes the debt system (whether we call it usury or not) so heinous is the fact that we create a whole class of wealthy people who contribute nothing to society but spending significant wealth to indirectly influence culture to take on debt to "have what they want". This has been going on for centuries (albeit with respect to living standards) and I would argue that that is the main point of the Khazarian narrative.
These people (Khazarian in descent or not) are literally living off the backs of everyone, they influence through the media and culture to keep the system instead of our culture being rooted in financial responsibility being you only take on what you can pay for at the moment. There are of course cases out there to pull on the heartstrings and point at to say "see this is why you sometimes need debt!!1!" But at the end of the day, do we really if we did not have a debt/inflation premised financial system? My interpretation would be that yes we do have a usury based financial system.
To me the Khazarian narrative dispells all the "muh joos" arguments to hit closer to the root of the problem and to show the way the world has been orchestrated since at least Babylon. The Cabal that dominates us today is descended from namestealers who have no nation but seek money and the power that comes with it. They infiltrate and make connections worldwide with the most influential and powerful people. They know the game better than any of us and the Khazarian narrative seems to communicate that to us whether you get caught up on tangents or not.
Why isn't it the Chinese plot to rule the world? Why isn't it the Muslim brotherhood plot to rule the world? Why isn't it the Saudi plot to rule the world?
Why do the above get systematically downplayed and discounted as being irrelevant by muh Khazarian Mafiaists?
Yes, Trump and Q took care of the Saudi branch at the beginning of his term ... but that was only a few years ago. Far more recent than the 500+ years ago the Khazarian Mafiatards want to insist is relevant.
Description of the Khazarians? Extremely vague. So vague it's functionally useless information. What are people supposed to do with that information? "The bad guys look like Jews, but they're not really Jews. They come from the Ukraine region. Now you know what they look like, go arrest them!"
lol, both these are puppets created by the Cabal. I am not claiming Khazarians are at the very top of the pyramid, but they are definitely much higher up than CCP or MB.
Checkout the history of Mao and who funded him and you will start seeing the picture.
Why did Mao support Palestine? You'd think if muh Khazarians had Mao by the balls, the least they could do is get him to support Israel over Palestine?
Right?
There are two perspectives to look at Israel vs Palestine
The conflict is a real conflict ("Jews vs Arabs") and the Khazarians are on one side (Israel) and their enemies are on the other side (Palestine)
The conflict is an illusion created by the Khazarians, who control both sides of the conflict. They need this conflict to ensure Israel is always on standby for a crisis mode whenever they need to milk something from the world. Also, the conflict helps them keep their puppets on both side in check as puppet leaders always tend to start thinking on their own.
Your question assumes that you are looking at it from the first perspective. However, the reality is the second perspective, so Khazarians just need different countries on different sides of this conflict to make it a real conflict. Mao was (based on your assertions) apparently assigned to support the Palestine side. It means nothing in reality.
This perspective also helps us understand why we talk about Khazarians and why it's not just a code word for Jews. Khazarians are the cones controlling both sides of the conflict, where are common Jews are the ones very much affected by the conflict and victims of these Khazarians.
Showing you two perspectives to think about is not "assumptions" or "extreme leaps of logic". If you think thinking about those two perspectives are too hard to do, thats your choice. Unfortunately, you wont expand your knowledge by trying to look at this in a piecemeal fashing trying to "prove this" or "disprove that" by looking at bits and pieces of information.
My advice to you is to keep looking until you find a viewpoint that explains all your observations of reality to your satisfaction and dont stop until then.
I still havent found that, but the more I dig and more I think, I find myself refining my viewpoint to explain the reality better and better.
You ignored all the horrid articles from "stateofthenation.co" that disparage Q.
Huh? Whats the relevance of this website to my reply? I dont care about that website. I only replied to your comment.
This I can endorse. It’s hard to maintain ataraxia sometimes, but it’s essential.
Eudaemonia is possible, but only with epoche. I’m only half jesting. These are Ancient Greek philosophical terms for suspending judgement on unknowables, (epoche), maintaining equanimity, or peace of mind, (ataraxia) in order to live the “good life” (eudaemonia).
Epicurus and Diogenes were both adherents to these concepts, but had wildly different approaches. Epicurus feasted and Diogenes fasted. The middle ground would be bulimia, which though popular in ancient Rome, seems rather less desirable currently.
Socrates is probably laughing his ass off somewhere.
It's funny how all of the left and some of the right scream anti-semitism as a shield and bludgeon against any and all real and perceived criticism against anyone Jewish or claiming to be Jewish. It's a catch-all phrase, deviously designed to immediately shut down any argument with frightening finality; any continuance will result in anti-semite being screamed in said "offending" person's face.
The thread and link are about Khazarians and you come in immediately with the "it's code for jews, you're persecuting me!" You tried to make it about Jews. Your eternal victimhood won't allow it to be any other way.
Interesting article. Confirms what I've understood, but goes into much more history than I had known.
...the historic aspect of this story is often overlooked....
Thanks fren, more confirmation that I needed. I'll let my younger sister read this. She's "studying history" in the university. God Bless from Sweden!
...where we howl 1, we howl all....
Did you read the whole thing? He calls Christ a scam at the end. Doubtless not in accord with your own views, eh?
“Falsus in uno Falsus in Omnibus”—
...I don't post articles because I agree with them...
...what I believe is immaterial to the issues at hand....
...in fact, the way "Christ" is presented in many "churches" today is a scam....
...open up your mind to the situational reality and don't be so hasty to judge....
not a scam in that he didnt exist - but history and even the bible has been rewritten to make people more compliant. "Turn the other cheek" has been used to get Christians to allow evil to happen to them or in front of them. "I bring not peace but a sword, and will turn brother against brother" is not the call to sit and do nothing.
The Catholic Church is pure evil and has been since day 1 it seems. and for at least 1000 years they controlled information on the Bible and most people had to go through the priesthood gatekeepers to be told what the Word is.
"The Kingdom of Heaven is within" and not - "Listen only to the Pope who wears red shoes(and has known pedo symbols on his robes) and a hat to Dagon the Babylonian fertility god and openly promotes abortion and communism"
Yeah. It was written in Greek, so they know what it says. Translation is difficult, but possible. The oldest manuscripts found in caves match what we have now. That’s practically a miracle itself. History records the events. Roman and Hebrew history and they weren’t sympathetic. I’m just saying “Big if True” in the ultimate sense.
It is difficult for most to believe as it is the scope and depth of the organized Evil the world is fighting today. Even more to realize this battle has been going on for thousands of years, and the same Evil from back then is still behind all these groups now. And same same worship is being done - money, child sacrifice, - to the horned transgender 'god' is not simply ancient history, but still here to this day and worldwide.
They have been trying this for thousands of years. Just look at the list of countries who have expelled them, including the US southern states... The "Union" was infiltrated early...
He knows the nose!
Well, I read it through. It’s comical pseudo history at best. But interestingly self revelatory nonetheless. This guy is seething and needs a target. He’s using a sawed off shotgun and spraying without praying. (He’s not accurate, and any hits are accidental) There’s no mention of multi century Tartar occupation of all Asia and Middle East. Mongols don’t look like that mask and they’re not fake Jooz either. No mention of Scythians, Phrygians, Parthians, etc. No mention of massive Persian empire, or Bedouins etc.
I don’t deny “Khazars”, by any name, are afoot, but so are many other groups and cabals, too numerous to mention. There’s plenty evil in every “race”. Also jubilee was 50th year, not 7th.
It’s also notable that they praise the Crusader Templars and revile the “City of London”. They’re the same guys. Templars seem heroic these days, but in the 13th century they had the world by the balls, and acted like it. They weren’t popular. Everyone owed them money, and they collected forcefully. They also allied with the Aga Khan of Alamut (who still exists, but not at Alamut. ) operating with his Assassins in numerous intrigues. Or so it’s said. The history of Outremer (Palestine under Frankish rule) is cloudy at best. Replete with shifting alliances and internecine squabbles. They took King Abgar’s Mandylion (gifted him by Jesus Himself after resurrection, legend has it) to Europe when they left. It’s displayed in Turin occasionally. No such fame for the Suderium (face cloth) of Aviedo, but it too was lifted from it’s original location in Jerusalem and taken to Spain of all places. These two relics are authentic, and they match up with forensic precision. They prove each other. Cultural appropriation, maybe, but I’m glad it’s publicly known, instead of sealed in a city wall at Antioch. It’s had a long journey, but it lasted long enough for modern science to closely examine it. The latest information is astoundingly confirmatory. At least I found it compelling. I’m not alone in that.
Then he starts in on Constantine, and the Council of Nicea, and equates Rome and the Roman Church with Khazars, and tops it off with an attack on Jesus and the Gospels, and the “Old Testament” to boot, claiming “Christianity” is borrowed from Buddhism, while praising apocryphal texts which though not included in “the Bible” were kept preserved and studied for centuries in Orthodox Monasteries which survive to this day all over the Middle East, Russia, Eastern Europe, even North America. There’s no Partiarchate Bank of Constantinople! If you want to see what Constantinople used to look like now you must visit Venice. The Doges carted off the architectural splendor after sacking the City in 1204 and occupying it for the several decades it took. Don’t conflate Orthodoxy with Rome. They excommunicated the other 4 churches (Jerusalem Alexandria, Antioch, Constantinople) in 1056. Over wether “Original Sin” implied Anna (Mary’s mother) gave virgin birth as well. That’s the “immaculate conception” concept. It’s based on a mistranslation by Augustine from Greek to Latin. Paul wrote in Greek, which was not Augustine’s best subject. Refuting Mani (of Manichaeism heresy) deserves high praise though. It’s just a nutty concept, but Rome demanded it be adhered to, along with Holy Spirit emanating from The Son as well as The Father, the so called Filioque. Rome went their own way, and in turn spawned Luther, Calvin, and so many others it’s impossible to list them. Maybe it’s for the best, I don’t know. At least we needn’t speculate as it’s all well known. Unlike the pseudo history of a phantom empire that coincidentally rules the world, sort of. They don’t rule me.
Other than that, it was moderately entertaining, in a janky looney tunes vein. Kinda like ancient aliens mixed with Triumph of the Will. Not true stuff. But I didn’t go to college, so what the hell do i know.
Immaculate Conception does not mean that Mary's mother was a virgin. It also doesn't mean that she was not conceived through sexual intercourse. It means that Mary was conceived without original sin, free from the effects of the sin of Adam.
I wasn’t there, so i don’t really know. I only know the dogma of my Church. Orthodox don’t believe in “original sin”. Anna was supposedly beyond child bearing age, and Joachim was incredulous, and was temporarily struck dumb for doubting it. That’s just tradition, but again, I wasn’t there.
Also no “Penal Substitutionary Atonement”. I found that comforting. But I’ve no way of verifying it.
I do know I’m not criticizing you personally. It’s a free country. Believe what you choose. I hope your pursuit of Truth will be fruitful.
I wish you well, too, my brother/sister.
Mary was conceived without original sin? Wow! I haven't heard that one before! So God, who created the universe, is not capable of having a virgin give birth? Wow, just wow!
Thank you. You've given me lots of new nuggets to seek/study in your synopsis.
I never wrote a longer comment reply. I don’t want people deceived. There’s plenty enough wrong in the world without it.
There’s an old joke about a talking dog offered for sale for $5. A prospective buyer interviews the dog, and hears a tale of work for the CIA, the TSA, etc, as an undercover informant. It’s astounding! So he asks why only $5? The owner says “He’s a LIAR! He’s never been out of that back yard!
The point is; We’re already amazing. There’s no need to embellish.
Yeah...I get what you're saying, BUT...my appreciation is expressed because I've been studying "fringe topics" for 35 years and collecting answers for MY path and you mentioned several things I had not come across or even considered before. So... not stroking ego here, just appreciate the fact that you took the time to go the distance. Cheers.
For the advanced madmen only: “Foucault’s Pendulum” by Umberto Eco.
Anything before 1820 is BS. Jesus died in the 1400s and we are much, much closer in time to "ancient" rome than we are taught. Everything in the historical narrative is BS.
While I’m familiar with the theory that there were no “dark ages” and 700 years were inserted. I don’t buy it. I can’t “know”, but who can? It’s good to question everything.
...compelling observations, nicely stated and framed....
..."it happens in spells"....
Grandma Dog
I hardly think my 3% home mortgage is usury! And keeping a credit card with high interest is a CHOICE people make, again, not usury! I'm not really sure what the point is of bringing up these things that are OBVIOUSLY not usury, in an attempt to "reveal" the "Khazarian mafia". Is this just a veiled attempt at anti-semitism? (yes, I see where they try to distinguish between "true Jews" versus the "fake Jews", but it just seems to muddy the waters rather than making a true distinction)
How is it not usury even if you have a choice to get into it or not? I think what makes the debt system (whether we call it usury or not) so heinous is the fact that we create a whole class of wealthy people who contribute nothing to society but spending significant wealth to indirectly influence culture to take on debt to "have what they want". This has been going on for centuries (albeit with respect to living standards) and I would argue that that is the main point of the Khazarian narrative.
These people (Khazarian in descent or not) are literally living off the backs of everyone, they influence through the media and culture to keep the system instead of our culture being rooted in financial responsibility being you only take on what you can pay for at the moment. There are of course cases out there to pull on the heartstrings and point at to say "see this is why you sometimes need debt!!1!" But at the end of the day, do we really if we did not have a debt/inflation premised financial system? My interpretation would be that yes we do have a usury based financial system.
To me the Khazarian narrative dispells all the "muh joos" arguments to hit closer to the root of the problem and to show the way the world has been orchestrated since at least Babylon. The Cabal that dominates us today is descended from namestealers who have no nation but seek money and the power that comes with it. They infiltrate and make connections worldwide with the most influential and powerful people. They know the game better than any of us and the Khazarian narrative seems to communicate that to us whether you get caught up on tangents or not.
Furthermore, it just seems like the "Khazarian" narrative further expands upon the Phonecian/Caananite one: https://rumble.com/v1nle3u-the-occult-hidden-world-they-secretly-built-around-us.html
...you are the exception...
The "Khazarian" narrative is so bullshit.
Why isn't it the Chinese plot to rule the world? Why isn't it the Muslim brotherhood plot to rule the world? Why isn't it the Saudi plot to rule the world?
Why do the above get systematically downplayed and discounted as being irrelevant by muh Khazarian Mafiaists?
Yes, Trump and Q took care of the Saudi branch at the beginning of his term ... but that was only a few years ago. Far more recent than the 500+ years ago the Khazarian Mafiatards want to insist is relevant.
Description of the Khazarians? Extremely vague. So vague it's functionally useless information. What are people supposed to do with that information? "The bad guys look like Jews, but they're not really Jews. They come from the Ukraine region. Now you know what they look like, go arrest them!"
China approves of the Khazarian Mafia narrative.
lol, both these are puppets created by the Cabal. I am not claiming Khazarians are at the very top of the pyramid, but they are definitely much higher up than CCP or MB.
Checkout the history of Mao and who funded him and you will start seeing the picture.
There are two perspectives to look at Israel vs Palestine
The conflict is a real conflict ("Jews vs Arabs") and the Khazarians are on one side (Israel) and their enemies are on the other side (Palestine)
The conflict is an illusion created by the Khazarians, who control both sides of the conflict. They need this conflict to ensure Israel is always on standby for a crisis mode whenever they need to milk something from the world. Also, the conflict helps them keep their puppets on both side in check as puppet leaders always tend to start thinking on their own.
Your question assumes that you are looking at it from the first perspective. However, the reality is the second perspective, so Khazarians just need different countries on different sides of this conflict to make it a real conflict. Mao was (based on your assertions) apparently assigned to support the Palestine side. It means nothing in reality.
This perspective also helps us understand why we talk about Khazarians and why it's not just a code word for Jews. Khazarians are the cones controlling both sides of the conflict, where are common Jews are the ones very much affected by the conflict and victims of these Khazarians.
Showing you two perspectives to think about is not "assumptions" or "extreme leaps of logic". If you think thinking about those two perspectives are too hard to do, thats your choice. Unfortunately, you wont expand your knowledge by trying to look at this in a piecemeal fashing trying to "prove this" or "disprove that" by looking at bits and pieces of information.
My advice to you is to keep looking until you find a viewpoint that explains all your observations of reality to your satisfaction and dont stop until then.
I still havent found that, but the more I dig and more I think, I find myself refining my viewpoint to explain the reality better and better.
Huh? Whats the relevance of this website to my reply? I dont care about that website. I only replied to your comment.
This I can endorse. It’s hard to maintain ataraxia sometimes, but it’s essential.
Eudaemonia is possible, but only with epoche. I’m only half jesting. These are Ancient Greek philosophical terms for suspending judgement on unknowables, (epoche), maintaining equanimity, or peace of mind, (ataraxia) in order to live the “good life” (eudaemonia).
Epicurus and Diogenes were both adherents to these concepts, but had wildly different approaches. Epicurus feasted and Diogenes fasted. The middle ground would be bulimia, which though popular in ancient Rome, seems rather less desirable currently.
Socrates is probably laughing his ass off somewhere.
The ones who come here with this retarded narrative are either
A) psyop infiltrators trying to undermine and discredit our board by making us look like nazis. B) the useful idiots of group A
I wish neither of these types of accounts were here, but this is part the tactics the enemy uses in this war.
Don’t try to “persuade” them. Just make your voice heard, let them know we see them, then move on to the next battle.
Also remember to report any flagrant race/religion hating comments. Mods are pretty good at handling them in my experience.
It's funny how all of the left and some of the right scream anti-semitism as a shield and bludgeon against any and all real and perceived criticism against anyone Jewish or claiming to be Jewish. It's a catch-all phrase, deviously designed to immediately shut down any argument with frightening finality; any continuance will result in anti-semite being screamed in said "offending" person's face.
Don't carry their water for them.
It’s because they’ve been “erased from history” by adding 700 years of fake history to make Easter not happen in December, or something.
He knows the nose!
The thread and link are about Khazarians and you come in immediately with the "it's code for jews, you're persecuting me!" You tried to make it about Jews. Your eternal victimhood won't allow it to be any other way.
The two down voters are sympathizers.
...I post articles of this nature just to flush out the glowies, and in this case, zionist sympathizers
u/#howl
Nope the people who call themselves jews are actually just Italians https://www.science.org/content/article/did-modern-jews-originate-italy